Nighttime light imagery offers a unique view of the Earth’s surface. In the past, the nighttime light data collected by the DMSP-OLS sensors have been used as an efficient means to correlate regional and global socio-economic activities. With the launch of the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi-NPP) satellite in 2011, the day-night band (DNB) of the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard represents a major advancement in nighttime imaging capabilities, because it surpasses its predecessor DMSP-OLS in radiometric accuracy, spatial resolution and geometric quality. In this paper, four variables (total night light, light area, average night light and log average night light) are extracted from nighttime radiance data observed by the VIIRS-DNB composite in 2013 and nighttime digital number (DN) data from the DMSP-OLS stable dataset in 2012, respectively, and correlated with 12 socio-economic parameters at the provincial level in mainland China during the corresponding period. Background noise of DNB composite data is removed using either a masking method or an optimal threshold method. In general, the correlation of these socio-economic data with the total night light and light area of VIIRS-DNB composite data is better than with the DMSP-OLS stable data. The correlations between total night light of denoised DNB composite data and built-up area, gross regional product (GRP) and power consumption are higher than 0.9 and so are the correlations between the light area of denoised DNB composite data and city and town population, built-up area, GRP, power consumption and waste water discharge. However, the correlations of socio-economic data with the average night light and log average night light of VIIRS-DNB composite data are not as good as with the DMSP-OLS stable data. To quantitatively analyze the reasons for the correlation difference, a cubic regression method is developed to correct the saturation effect of the DMSP stable data, and we artificially convert the pixel value of the DNB composite into six bits to match the DMSP stable data format. The correlation results between the processed data and socio-economic data show that the effects of saturation and quantization are two of the reasons for the correlation difference. Additionally, on this basis, we estimate the total night light ratio between saturation-corrected DMSP stable data and finite quantization DNB composite data, and it is found that the ratio is ~11.28 ± 4.02 for China. Therefore, it appears that a different acquisition time is the other reason for the correlation difference.

Landsat Level-1 products are delivered as quantized and calibrated scaled Digital Numbers (DN). The Level-1 DN data can be rescaled to Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) reflectance applying radiometric rescaling coefficients. Currently, the Level-1 product is the standard data product of the Landsat sensors. The more recent Level-2 data products contain surface reflectance values, i.e., reflectance as it would be measured at ground level in the absence of atmospheric effects; in the near future, these products are anticipated to become the standard products of the Landsat sensors. The purpose of this paper is to present a radiometric performance evaluation of Level-1 and Level-2 data products for the Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) sensors. TOA reflectance and derived surface reflectance values from both data products were evaluated and compared to in situ measurements from eight test sites located in Turkey, Brazil, Chile, the United States, France, and Namibia. The results indicate an agreement between the ETM+ and OLI Level-1 TOA reflectance data and the in situ measurements of 3.9% to 6.5% and 3.9% to 6.0%, respectively, across all spectral bands. Agreement between the in situ measurements and both Level-2 surface reflectance data products were consistently decreased in the shorter wavelength bands, and slightly better in the longer wavelength bands. The mean percent absolute error for Level-2 surface reflectance data ranged from 3.3% to 10% for both Landsat sensors. The significant decay in agreement with the data collected in situ in the short wavelength spectral bands with Level-2 data suggests issues with retrieval of aerosol concentration at some sites. In contrast, the results indicate a reasonably accurate estimate of water vapor in the mid-infrared spectrum. Lastly, despite the less reliable performance of Level-2 data product in the visible spectral region (compared with Level-1 data) in both sensors, the Landsat-8 OLI Level-2 showed an improvement of surface reflectance product over all spectral bands in common with the Landsat-7 ETM+ Level-2 data.

Recently, the NOAA has included GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) Radio Occultation (RO) data as one of the crucial long-term observables for weather and climate applications. To include more GNSS RO data in its numerical weather prediction systems, the NOAA Commercial Weather Data Pilot program (CWDP) started to explore the commercial RO data available on the market. After two rounds of pilot studies, the CWDP decided to award the first Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to GeoOptics and Spire Incs. in 2020. This study examines the quality of Spire RO data products for weather and climate applications. Spire RO data collected from commercial CubeSats are carefully compared with data from Formosa Satellite Mission 7–Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2), the fifth-generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5), and high-quality radiosonde data. The results demonstrate that, despite their generally lower Signal-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Spire RO data show a pattern of lowest penetration height similar to that of COSMIC-2. The Spire and COSMIC-2 penetration heights are between 0.6 and 0.8 km altitude over tropical oceans. Although using different GNSS RO receivers, the precision of Spire STRATOS receivers is of the same quality as those of the COSMIC-2 TriG (Global Positioning System—GPS, GALILEO, and GLObal NAvigation Satellite System—GLONASS) RO Receiver System (TGRS) receivers. Furthermore, the Spire and COSMIC-2 retrieval accuracies are quite comparable. We validate the Spire temperature and water vapor profiles by comparing them with collocated radiosonde observation (RAOB) data. Generally, over the height region between 8 km and 16.5 km, the Spire temperature profiles match those from RS41 RAOB very well, with temperature biases of <0.02 K. Over the height range from 17.8 to 26.4 km, the temperature differences are ~−0.034 K, with RS41 RAOB being warmer. We also estimate the error covariance matrix for Spire, COSMIC-2, and KOMPSAT-5. The results show that the COSMIC-2 estimated error covariance values are slightly more significant than those from Spire over the oceans at the mid-latitudes (45°N–30°N and 30°S–45°S), which may be owing to COSMIC-2 SNR being relatively lower at those latitudinal zones.

In 2013, the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) Infrared and Visible Optical Sensors Subgroup (IVOS) established the Radiometric Calibration Network (RadCalNet), consisting of four international test sites providing automated in situ measurements and estimates of propagated top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance. This work evaluates the ‘reliability’ of RadCalNet TOA reflectance data at three of these sites—RVUS, LCFR, and GONA—using Landsat 7 ETM+, Landsat 8 operational land imager (OLI), and Sentinel 2A/2B (S2A/S2B) MSI TOA reflectance data. This work identified a viewing angle effect in the MSI data at the RVUS and LCFR sites; when corrected, the overall standard deviation in relative reflectance differences decreased by approximately 2% and 0.5% at the RVUS and LCFR sites, respectively. Overall, the relative mean differences between the RadCalNet surface data and sensor data for the RVUS and GONA sites are within 5% for ETM+, OLI, and S2A MSI, with an approximately 2% higher difference in the S2B MSI data at the RVUS site. The LCFR site is different from the other two sites, with relative mean differences ranging from approximately -10% to 1%, even after performing the viewing angle effect correction on the MSI data. The data from RadCalNet are easy to acquire and use. More effort is needed to better understand the behavior at LCFR. One significant improvement on the accuracy of the RadCalNet data might be the development of a site-specific BRDF characterization and correction.

Accurate LiDAR-camera extrinsic calibration is a precondition for many multi-sensor systems in mobile robots. Most calibration methods rely on laborious manual operations and calibration targets. While working online, the calibration methods should be able to extract information from the environment to construct the cross-modal data association. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have powerful feature extraction ability and have been used for calibration. However, most of the past methods solve the extrinsic as a regression task, without considering the geometric constraints involved. In this paper, we propose a novel end-to-end extrinsic calibration method named DXQ-Net, using a differentiable pose estimation module for generalization. We formulate a probabilistic model for LiDAR-camera calibration flow, yielding a prediction of uncertainty to measure the quality of LiDAR-camera data association. Testing experiments illustrate that our method achieves a competitive with other methods for the translation component and state-of-the-art performance for the rotation component. Generalization experiments illustrate that the generalization performance of our method is significantly better than other deep learning-based methods.

The absolute radiometric calibration of remote sensing sensors is crucial to the accurate retrieval of biogeophysical parameters through remote sensing. The radiometric calibration uncertainty is the index that describes the reliability of a calibration result and is usually empirically determined by assuming that all of the factors involved are independent of each other. Through a field campaign carried out in Inner Mongolia, China, which aimed to accurately calibrate remote sensing sensors, we developed a Monte Carlo method that statistically evaluates the radiometric calibration uncertainty. From Monte Carlo simulations, it was revealed that the overall uncertainty is much smaller than the root sum of squares of each factor, suggesting that there is some negative correlation among some of the factors. For a surface with a low reflectance (~5%), the radiometric calibration uncertainty was ~7.0%, whereas for a surface with a reflectance larger than 20%, the uncertainty was stable at ~3.0%. This result suggests that the quality of remote sensing data should be carefully examined for surfaces with a low reflectance.