This study aimed to investigate the actual use of eye drops for dry eye disease (DED), the reasons for instillation behavior, and the relationship between instillation behavior and subjective symptoms. This web-based cross-sectional study collected data on instillation behavior, medication instruction, reasons for instillation behavior, and subjective symptoms. In total, 2645 participants were enrolled. The proportion of participants who instilled at the frequency specified in the package insert (the specified frequency) was 10.2%. The most common reason for not instilling at the prescribed frequency was as-needed instillation to alleviate subjective symptoms, and 61.3% of participants instilled when feeling symptoms. The improvement in the subjective symptoms score was significantly greater in the group that regularly instilled at the specified frequency than the other group (p = 0.0027), and patients in the other group were younger and had a higher rate of contact lens use and over-the-counter eye drops use. In conclusion, most participants did not instill the DED eye drops at the specified frequency to alleviate symptoms. In order to obtain the appropriate effect of eye drops, ophthalmologists need to impress upon patients the importance of regular instillation at the frequency specified in the package insert, while taking into account patient characteristics.

Objective – Acute stroke patients with dysphagia are usually fed by nasogastric tube. However, this method sometimes causes pneumonia or diarrhea. We investigated the use of a new feeding procedure called intermittent oro‐esophageal (IOE) tube feeding in acute stroke patients with severe dysphagia. Materials and methods – The IOE method was used in 13 acute stroke patients (68 ± 14 years old; 12 had a brainstem infarction), who were alert, but had severe dysphagia and a weak pharyngeal reflex. IOE tube feeding was carried out as follows. A feeding tube was passed orally into the lower portion of the esophagus, food supplements were administered through the tube at a rate of approximately 50 ml/min, and the tube was removed after finishing the supplement infusion. Results – We found that the IOE method had the following advantages: (i) IOE feeding took approximately 15 min; (ii) potentially reduced a risk of complications such as pneumonia and diarrhea; and (iii) oral tube insertion stimulated the oral cavity and pharynx, which may improve the swallowing function. However, the IOE feeding method should not be used in patients who: (i) could not understand the IOE procedure; (ii) had an esophageal hiatal hernia or incomplete peristalsis of the esophagus, as such patients are at risk of having the supplement reflux into the oral cavity. Conclusion – The IOE feeding method may be one of the alternatives to continuous nasogastric tube feeding in acute stroke patients with severe dysphagia, who are alert.

To determine whether quality of life (QOL) and health utility are affected to the same extent among dry eye (DE) patients with short tear film break-up time dry eye (TBUT-DE) with minimal clinical signs were as severe as aqueous-deficient dry eye (ADDE). A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among DE patients who visited one of 10 eye clinics in Japan. Among the 463 registered patients, this study involved 449 patients with DE who were aged 20 years or older. Ophthalmic examination findings were assessed, including tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I value, and keratoconjunctival staining score. QOL was evaluated with the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS; 0 [best], 100 [worst]) and health utility (1 [total health], 0 [worst]) with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3); scores were stratified by DE subgroup. Median (interquartile range) of DEQS and HUI-3 scores across all participants were 21.7 (10.0–40.0) and 0.82 (0.69–0.91), respectively. Median (interquartile range) DEQS and HUI-3 scores in the ADDE group were 23.3 (10.0–40.0) and 0.79 (0.69–0.88), respectively; those in the short TBUT-DE group were 23.3 (13.3–38.3) and 0.82 (0.74–0.92), respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in questionnaire scores. Among the ophthalmic examination findings, a weak significant correlation between TBUT, corneal staining score and keratoconjunctival staining score to DEQS; TBUT and Schirmer test values to HUI-3, were seen. The burden of short TBUT-DE on QOL as assessed by the DEQS and HUI-3 was as severe as that in ADDE. Our findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the impact of short TBUT-DE on patients QOL and utility values. University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration no. UMIN 000015890). Registered 10th December 2014, retrospectively registered.

Purpose. This study examined the association between the severity of visual field defects and the prevalence of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Methods. This is a cross-sectional study. Japanese patients who have had driver’s licence between 40 and 85 years of age were screened for eligibility. Participants answered a questionnaire about MVCs experienced during the previous 5 years. Subjects with POAG were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe visual field defect. We evaluated associations between the severity of POAG and the prevalence of MVCs by logistic regression models.Results. The prevalence of MVCs was significantly associated with the severity of POAG categorized by worse eye MD (control: 30/187 = 16.0%; mild POAG: 17/92 = 18.5%; moderate POAG: 14/60 = 23.3%; severe POAG: 14/47 = 29.8%;P=0.025, Cochran-Armitage trend test). Compared to the control group, the adjusted OR for MVC prevalence in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe POAG in the worse eye was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.55 to 2.10), 1.44 (95% CI: 0.68 to 3.08), and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.07 to 4.88).Conclusions. There is a significant association between the severity of glaucoma in the worse eye MD and the prevalence of MVCs.

The aim of this paper is to propose a systematic review on the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) and its economic burden in Japan and other countries. A systematic review was performed of data gathered from a PubMed search between 2002 to 2017, using the following key words: “dry eye,” “prevalence,” “epidemiology,” and “risk factors.” There have been several cross-sectional studies evaluating the epidemiological aspect of DED in Japan: two population-based studies, two cross-sectional studies on visual display terminal (VDT) users, and one study focusing on high school students. One study calculated the direct cost of DED, and two calculated the indirect cost using a work productivity assessment to evaluate the economic burden. The prevalence of DED in the Japanese population was relatively high in all studies compared to reports from other countries. In Japan, the annual health plan cost per patient was estimated to be $323 (US). Work productivity loss per patient associated with definite DED was estimated to be between $741 and $6160. To conclude, it was found that DED is prevalent across generations in the Japanese population, and costs related to the disease lead to considerable economic burden.