Woosung Lim

Dr. Woosung Lim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 March 2014 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJisun Kim
Jisun Kim
WLWoosung Lim
Woosung Lim
EKEun-Kyu Kim
Eun-Kyu Kim
MKMin-Kyoon Kim
Min-Kyoon Kim
NPnam sun paik
nam sun paik
WHWonshik Han
Wonshik Han
Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor has shown efficacy comparable to that of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that the antidiabetic drug metformin has anti-tumor activity. This prospective, multicenter, phase II randomized, placebo controlled trial was designed to evaluate the direct anti-tumor effect of metformin in non-diabetic postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Methods/Design: Patients meeting the inclusion criteria and providing written informed consent will be randomized to 24 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/day) and either metformin (2000 mg/day) or placebo. Target accrual number is 104 patients per arm. The primary endpoint will be clinical response rate, as measured by calipers. Secondary endpoints include pathologic complete response rate, breast conserving rate, change in Ki67 expression, breast density change, and toxicity profile. Molecular assays will be performed using samples obtained before treatment, at week 4, and postoperatively. Discussion: This study will provide direct evidence of the anti-tumor effect of metformin in non-diabetic, postmenopausal patients with ER-positive breast cancer. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01589367

6 November 2015 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYe Won Jeon
Ye Won Jeon
SKSu Hwan Kang
Su Hwan Kang
MPMin Ho Park
Min Ho Park
WLWoosung Lim
Woosung Lim
SCSe Heun Cho
Se Heun Cho
YSYoung Jin Suh
Young Jin Suh
The association between body mass index (BMI) at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and the prognosis of breast cancer patients remains controversial. Furthermore, the association between BMI and prognosis with respect to different breast cancer subtypes is not clearly defined. We analyzed data from 41,021 invasive breast cancer patients between January 1988 and February 2008 from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR) database. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox’s proportional hazard regression model among all patients and specific breast cancer subtypes with respect to BMI categories. A U-shaped association between BMI and mortality was observed in the total cohort. Underweight and obese individuals exhibited worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.23 [95 % confidence interval {CI}, 1.05 to 1.44] and 1.29 [1.13 to 1.48], respectively) and BCSS (1.26 [1.03 to 1.54] and 1.21 [1.02 to 1.43], respectively) than normal-weight individuals. In the estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) - subgroup, obese individuals exhibited worse OS (1.48 [1.18 to 1.85]) and BCSS (1.31 [1.13 to 1.52]) than normal-weight individuals. Conversely, in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup, underweight individuals exhibited worse OS (1.68 [1.12 to 2.47]) and BCSS (1.79 [1.11 to 2.90]) than normal-weight individuals. We observed a U-shaped relationship between BMI at diagnosis and poor OS and BCSS among all breast cancer patients. However, obesity in the ER and/or PR+/HER2- subgroup and underweight in the ER and PR-/HER2+ subgroup were poor prognostic factors. Therefore, BMI at diagnosis and breast cancer subtype should be considered simultaneously in various treatment decision processes and surveillance schedules.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJeongshin An
Jeongshin An
HKHyungju Kwon
Hyungju Kwon
WLWoosung Lim
Woosung Lim
BMByung-In Moon
Byung-In Moon
The microbiome involved in the human estrogen metabolism is known as the estrobolome. This study aimed to show that the estrobolome can be used in breast cancer treatment. We first analyzed the blood microbiome composition of healthy controls and patients with breast cancer. In particular, we investigated the bacteria producing β−glucuronidase and/or β−galactosidase, which are involved in estrogen metabolism in the human body. Staphylococcus species were more abundant in healthy controls than in breast cancer patients and therefore were selected for further analyses. The effect of Staphylococcus aureus on endocrine therapy was analyzed by a combination treatment with tamoxifen. Analysis of the microbiome of blood samples showed that species producing β−glucuronidase were more abundant in breast cancer patients than in healthy controls. Further experiments confirmed that the efficacy of tamoxifen increased when administered in conjugation with the extracellular vesicles (EVs) of S. aureus. Based on our results, we deduced that S. aureus EVs could potentially be used as adjuvants for breast cancer treatment in the future.

1 January 2021 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMin Jung Ko
Min Jung Ko
DPDong Ah Park
Dong Ah Park
SKSung Hyun Kim
Sung Hyun Kim
EKEun Sook Ko
Eun Sook Ko
KSKyunghwan Shin
Kyunghwan Shin
JCJung Min Chang
Jung Min Chang
Ko MJ, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1240-1252. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227

10 June 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJoohyun Woo
Joohyun Woo
HPHeejung Park
Heejung Park
SSSun Hee Sung
Sun Hee Sung
BMByung-In Moon
Byung-In Moon
HSHyunsuk Suh
Hyunsuk Suh
WLWoosung Lim
Woosung Lim
Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is an essential protein for DNA base excision repair (BER) and redox regulation. The ability of cancer cells to recognize DNA damage and initiate DNA repair is an important mechanism for therapeutic resistance. Several recent studies have suggested that APE1 expression levels and/or subcellular dysregulation may be used to indicate the sensitivity of tumors to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the prognostic significance of APE1 and differences in APE1 expression levels according to breast cancer molecular subtypes. We analyzed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections from 243 cases diagnosed as invasive breast cancer at Ewha Womans University Medical Center between January 2003 and December 2008. Immunohistochemistry was performed and the nuclear level of APE1 was scored by taking into account the percentage of positive cells. Medical records were reviewed to investigate clinicopathologic characteristics. We found that nuclear APE1 high-level expression (proportion ≥50%) in breast cancer showed a tendency towards unfavorable prognosis regarding disease-free survival (p = 0.093). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival between low and high-level expression groups (p = 0.294). Interestingly, within the Ki-67 low-level expression group, APE1 low-level expression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (p = 0.007). A significant positive correlation was observed between APE1 nuclear expression and estrogen receptor status (75.7% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.022). Also, the luminal A subtype was the most commonly observed breast cancer subtype in the APE1 high-level expression group (61.6% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.000). This study suggests that APE1 expression may be associated with breast cancer prognosis. In particular, its role as a prognostic factor would be significant for breast cancers with a low Ki-67 proliferation index. It is proposed that nuclear APE1 may be a novel target in breast cancer with a low proliferation rate to obtain better outcome.

1 January 2024 in Journal of Breast Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJi-Jung Jung
Ji-Jung Jung
JCJong-Ho Cheun
Jong-Ho Cheun
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
JKJiwon Koh
Jiwon Koh
JRJai Min Ryu
Jai Min Ryu
HLHan-Byoel Lee
Han-Byoel Lee
Jung JJ, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2024 Feb;27:e8. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.0265