One of the most promising photosensitizers (PS) used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the porphyrin derivative 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC, temoporfin), marketed in Europe under the trade name Foscan^®. A set of five human cancer cell lines from head and neck and other PDT-relevant tissues was used to investigate oxidative stress and underlying cell death mechanisms of mTHPC-mediated PDT in vitro. Cells were treated with mTHPC in equitoxic concentrations and illuminated with light doses of 1.8–7.0 J/cm² and harvested immediately, 6, 24, or 48 h post illumination for analyses. Our results confirm the induction of oxidative stress after mTHPC-based PDT by detecting a total loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ_m) and increased formation of ROS. However, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and loss of cell membrane integrity play only a minor role in cell death in most cell lines. Based on our results, apoptosis is the predominant death mechanism following mTHPC-mediated PDT. Autophagy can occur in parallel to apoptosis or the former can be dominant first, yet ultimately leading to autophagy-associated apoptosis. The death of the cells is in some cases accompanied by DNA fragmentation and a G₂/M phase arrest. In general, the overall phototoxic effects and the concentrations as well as the time to establish these effects varies between cell lines, suggesting that the cancer cells are not all dying by one defined mechanism, but rather succumb to an individual interplay of different cell death mechanisms. Besides the evaluation of the underlying cell death mechanisms, we focused on the comparison of results in a set of five identically treated cell lines in this study. Although cells were treated under equitoxic conditions and PDT acts via a rather unspecific ROS formation, very heterogeneous results were obtained with different cell lines. This study shows that general conclusions after PDT in vitro require testing on several cell lines to be reliable, which has too often been ignored in the past.

The combined use of a photosensitizing agent, light and dioxygen for the treatment of diseases has become known as photodynamic therapy (PDT) and was first discovered more than one hundred years ago. Over the years, PDT has proven its potential for the treatment of malignant and non-malignant lesions in addition to classical cancer therapy in numerous clinical studies, but application as a routine method is still limited. In this review, the development of modern PDT since the beginning of the twentieth century is briefly portrayed. The underlying mechanisms of phototoxicity are explained, and the requirements for ideal photosensitizers (PS) are underlined. Selected PS are introduced and examples of some of the many attempts made at the optimization of PDT by developing new PS with improved chemical and phototoxic properties, are reviewed. Promising 3rd generation PS are introduced and newer approaches to increasing tumor selectivity and efficacy of PDT, such as with nanoparticles, are discussed.

The platinum(II) complexes carboplatin (CBDCA), cisplatin (CDDP) and oxaliplatin (1-OHP) are used as anticancer drugs in a large number of tumour chemotherapy regimens. Many attempts have been made to combine Pt(II)-based chemotherapy with alternative treatment strategies. One such alternative anticancer approach is known as photodynamic therapy (PDT), where a non-toxic photosensitizer (PS) produces oxidative stress via the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after local illumination of the affected tissue. A very promising PS is 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC, Temoporfin), which is approved for the treatment of head and neck cancer in Europe. In the present study, a combination of mTHPC-mediated PDT and either CBDCA, CDDP, or 1-OHP was applied to five human cancer cell lines from different tumour origins. Cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT assay and synergistic effects on cytotoxicity were evaluated by calculation of Combination Indices (CI). Synergy was identified in some of the combinations, for example, with 1-OHP in three of the tested cell lines but antagonism was also observed for a number of combinations in certain cell lines. In cases of synergy, elevated ROS levels were observed after combination but apoptosis induction was not necessarily increased compared to a treatment with a single compound. Cell cycle analysis revealed a formation of apoptotic subG1 populations and S phase as well as G2/M phase arrests after combination. In conclusion, pre-treatment with mTHPC-PDT has the potential to sensitize some types of tumour cells towards Pt(II) complexes, in particular 1-OHP but synergy is highly dependent on the type of cancer.

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) has increased over the past years and mainly affects women above the age of 45 years. Metabolic diseases such as obesity and type II diabetes mellitus as well as associated conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia lead to elevated levels of circulating estrogens. Increased estrogen concentrations, in turn, further trigger the proliferation of endometrial cells and thus promote EC development and progression, especially in the absence of progesterone as seen in postmenopausal women. Elevated blood glucose levels in diabetic patients further contribute to the risk of EC development. Metformin is an insulin-sensitizing biguanide drug, commonly used in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus, especially in obese patients. Besides its effects on glucose metabolism, metformin displayed anti-cancer effects in various cancer types, including EC. Direct anti-cancer effects of metformin target signaling pathways that are involved in cellular growth and proliferation, e.g. the AKT/PKB/mTOR pathway. Further proteins and pathways have been suggested as potential targets, but the underlying mechanism of action of metformin’s anti-cancer activity is still not completely understood. In the present study, the effects of metformin on protein expression were investigated in the human EC cell line HEC-1A using an affinity proteomic approach. Cells were treated with 0.5 mmol/L metformin over a period of 7 days and changes in the expression pattern of 1,300 different proteins were compared to the expression in untreated control cells as well as insulin-treated cells. Insulin treatment (100 ng/mL) was incorporated into the study in order to implement a model for insulin resistance and associated hyperinsulinemia, conditions that are often observed in obese and diabetic patients. Furthermore, the culture medium was supplemented with 10 nmol/L ß-estradiol (E2) during treatments to mimic increased estrogen levels, a common risk factor for EC development. Based on the most prominent and significant changes in expression, a set of 80 proteins was selected and subjected to a more detailed analysis. The data revealed that metformin and insulin targeted similar pathways in the present study and mostly acted on proteins related to proliferation, migration and tumor immune response. These pathways may be affected in a tumor-promoting as well as a tumor-suppressing way by either metformin treatment or insulin supplementation. The consequences for the cells resulting from the detected expression changes were discussed in detail for several proteins. The presented data helps identify potential targets affected by metformin treatment in EC and allows for a better understanding of the mechanism of action of the biguanide drug’s anti-cancer activity. However, further investigations are necessary to confirm the observations and conclusions drawn from the presented data after metformin administration, especially for proteins that were regulated in a favorable way, i.e. AKT3, CCND2, CD63, CD81, GFAP, IL5, IL17A, IRF4, PI3, and VTCN1. Further proteins might be of interest, where metformin counteracted unfavorable effects that have been induced by hyperinsulinemia.

Objectives In this study, the pharmacological properties of six spirocyclic piperidines 1–6 showing very high σ₁ receptor affinity (K_i = 0.2–16 nm) were investigated. Methods In vitro receptor binding studies, retinal ganglion assay and in vivo capsaicin assay were used to determine the affinity, selectivity and activity. Influence on human tumour cell growth (cell lines A427, LCLC‐103H, 5637 and DAN‐G) was determined in different assays. The effect on the ergosterol and cholesterol biosynthesis was determined by GLC/MS analysis. Key findings Receptor binding studies demonstrated high selectivity for the σ₁ receptor. The increased Ca²⁺ influx mediated by 2 and the analgesic activity of 1, 4, 5 and 6 confirm σ₁ receptor antagonistic activity. Inhibition of human tumour cell growth further supports the σ₁ antagonistic effects. Treatment of A427 tumour cells with 2 led to cell detachment and cell degradation. Whereas the ergosterol biosynthesis was not affected, the sterol C14‐reductase, a key enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis, was weakly inhibited. Conclusions Due to the high selectivity, off‐target effects are not expected. The antiallodynic activity underlines the clinical potential of the spirocyclic piperidines for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Due to the antiproliferative activity, the spirocyclic σ₁ antagonists represent promising antitumour agents.