SUNG WON KIM

SUNG WON KIM


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2014 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jinah JangJinah Jang
Jinah Jang
YSYoung-Joon Seol
Young-Joon Seol
HKHyeon Ji Kim
Hyeon Ji Kim
JKJoydip Kundu
Joydip Kundu
SKSUNG WON KIM
SUNG WON KIM
Dong-Woo ChoDong-Woo Cho
Dong-Woo Cho

23 June 2021 in Advanced Healthcare Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SJSungwoong Jeon
Sungwoong Jeon
SPSun Hwa Park
Sun Hwa Park
EKEunhee Kim
Eunhee Kim
JKJin‐Young Kim
Jin‐Young Kim
SKSUNG WON KIM
SUNG WON KIM
HCHongsoo Choi
Hongsoo Choi

1 December 2018 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJeong Hun Park
Jeong Hun Park
JPJu Young Park
Ju Young Park
INInn-Chul Nam
Inn-Chul Nam
MAMinjun Ahn
Minjun Ahn
JLJae Yeon Lee
Jae Yeon Lee
Dong-Woo ChoDong-Woo Cho
Dong-Woo Cho

10 November 2021 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJeong Hun Park
Jeong Hun Park
MAMinjun Ahn
Minjun Ahn
SPSun Hwa Park
Sun Hwa Park
HKHyeonji Kim
Hyeonji Kim
MBMihyeon Bae
Mihyeon Bae
Dong-Woo ChoDong-Woo Cho
Dong-Woo Cho

8 April 2022 in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDO HYUN KIM
DO HYUN KIM
SKSUNG WON KIM
SUNG WON KIM
MBMohammed Abdullah Basurraj
Mohammed Abdullah Basurraj
SHSe Hwan Hwang
Se Hwan Hwang
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in clinical and laboratory features between eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) and non-ECRS and to compare diagnostic criteria for ECRS.Methods. We compared clinical features and/or laboratory findings classified as ECRS and non-ECRS according to various diagnostic criteria (histological and clinical). We also analyzed studies to compare endoscopic findings, symptom scores, laboratory findings, and computed tomography (CT) findings between ECRS and non-ECRS.Results. Our search included 55 studies with 6,143 patients. A comparison of clinical features and/or laboratory criteria with histological criteria showed no significant differences in nasal symptom scores and CT scores according to criteria. Serum eosinophil levels showed differences across the criteria, with ECRS consistently characterized by higher serum eosinophil levels than non-ECRS. Among the four criteria, the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) criteria and tissue eosinophilia (≥70) were associated with decreased olfactory function. In laboratory findings, the eosinophil percentage (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.561; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.329–1.794; P<0.001) and eosinophil count (SMD, 1.493; 95% CI, 1.134–1.852; P<0.001) of eosinophils were higher in ECRS than non-ECRS. In clinical findings, nasal symptom scores (SMD, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.156–0.608; P<0.001), endoscopic nasal polyp scores (SMD, 0.581; 95% CI, 0.314–0.848; P<0.001), and olfactory dysfunction (SMD, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.037–0.794; P=0.031) were higher in ECRS than in non-ECRS. With regard to CT findings, the whole-sinus opacification score (SMD, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.588–1.059; P<0.001) was higher in ECRS than in non-ECRS. In particular, there were significant differences in anterior ethmoid sinus and sphenoid sinus opacification.Conclusion. ECRS and non-ECRS differ in their clinical and laboratory features. When histological confirmation is difficult on an outpatient basis, ECRS could be diagnosed using clinical features and/or laboratory findings.

1 April 2013 in The Laryngoscope
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKBoo Young Kim
Boo Young Kim
JSJi-Hyeon Shin
Ji-Hyeon Shin
SKSeok-Gu Kang
Seok-Gu Kang
SKSUNG WON KIM
SUNG WON KIM
YHYong Kil Hong
Yong Kil Hong
YPYong Jin Park
Yong Jin Park