TMEM16A (known as anoctamin 1) Ca2+-activated chloride channel is overexpressed in many tumors. TMEM16A overexpression can be caused by gene amplification in many tumors harboring 11q13 amplification. TMEM16A expression is also controlled in many cancer cells via transcriptional regulation, epigenetic regulation and microRNAs. In addition, TMEM16A activates different signaling pathways in different cancers, e.g. the EGFR and CAMKII signaling in breast cancer, the p38 and ERK1/2 signaling in hepatoma, the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK1/2 signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and bladder cancer, and the NFκB signaling in glioma. Furthermore, TMEM16A overexpression has been reported to promote, inhibit, or produce no effects on cell proliferation and migration in different cancer cells. Since TMEM16A exerts different roles in different cancer cells via activation of distinct signaling pathways, we try to develop the idea that TMEM16A regulates cancer cell proliferation and migration in a cell-dependent mechanism. The cell-specific role of TMEM16A may depend on the cellular environment that is predetermined by TMEM16A overexpression mechanisms specific for a particular cancer type. TMEM16A may exert its cell-specific role via its associated protein networks, phosphorylation by different kinases, and involvement of different signaling pathways. In addition, we discuss the role of TMEM16A channel activity in cancer, and its clinical use as a prognostic and predictive marker in different cancers. This review highlights the cell-type specific mechanisms of TMEM16A in cancer, and envisions the promising use of TMEM16A inhibitors as a potential treatment for TMEM16A-overexpressing cancers.

Background: Accumulating evidence shows that N6-methyladenine (m⁶A) modulators contribute to the etiology and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the exact mechanisms of m⁶A reader involved in glycolytic metabolism remain vague. This article aimed to crosstalk the m⁶A reader with glycolytic metabolism and reveal a new mechanism for the progression of CRC. Methods: The relationship between candidate lncRNA and m⁶A reader was analyzed by bioinformatics, ISH and IHC assays. In vivo and in vitro studies (including MTT, CFA, trans-well, apoptosis, western blot, qRT-PCR and xenograft mouse models) were utilized to explore the biological functions of these indicators. Lactate detection, ATP activity detection and ECAR assays were used to verify the biological function of the downstream target. The bioinformatics, RNA stability, RIP experiments and RNA pull-down assays were used to explore the potential molecular mechanisms. Results: We identified that the crosstalk of the m⁶A reader IMP2 with long-noncoding RNA (lncRNA) ZFAS1 in an m⁶A modulation-dependent manner, subsequently augmented the recruitment of Obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis and glycolysis during CRC proliferation and progression. Specifically, IMP2 and ZFAS1 are significantly overexpressed with elevated m⁶A levels in CRC cells and paired CRC cohorts (n = 144). These indicators could be independent biomarkers for CRC prognostic prediction. Notably, IMP2 regulated ZFAS1 expression and enhanced CRC cell proliferation, colony formation, and apoptosis inhibition; thus, it was oncogenic. Mechanistically, ZFAS1 is modified at adenosine +843 within the RGGAC/RRACH element in an m⁶A-dependent manner. Thus, direct interaction between the KH3–4 domain of IMP2 and ZFAS1 where IMP2 serves as a reader for m⁶A-modified ZFAS1 and promotes the RNA stability of ZFAS1 is critical for CRC development. More importantly, stabilized ZFAS1 recognizes the OBG-type functional domain of OLA1, which facilitated the exposure of ATP-binding sites (NVGKST, 32–37), enhanced its protein activity, and ultimately accelerated ATP hydrolysis and the Warburg effect. Conclusions: Our findings reveal a new cancer-promoting mechanism, that is, the critical modulation network underlying m⁶A readers stabilizes lncRNAs, and they jointly promote mitochondrial energy metabolism in the pathogenesis of CRC.

Hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) plays critical roles in induction of cancer stem cell-like phenotype in breast cancer and contribute to chemoresistance. However, the mechanism underlying stemness reprogramming of breast cancer cells (BCs) by hypoxic TME remains largely unknown. In the present study, we illustrated that HIF-2α, but not HIF-1α, induces stemness in BCs under hypoxia through SOD2-mtROS-PDI/GRP78-UPR^ER pathway, linking mitochondrial metabolic state to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) response via mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) level. HIF-2α activates endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response (UPR^ER) in drug-sensitive MCF7 and T47D cells to induce drug-resistant stem-like phenotype. Genetic depletion or pharmacological inhibition (YQ-0629) of HIF-2α abolished hypoxia-induced stem-like phenotype in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, HIF-2α activates transcription of superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) under hypoxia and thereby decreases mtROS level. With less mtROS transported to endoplasmic reticulum, the expression and activity of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is suppressed, allowing glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) to dissociate from receptor proteins of UPR^ER and bind misfolded protein to activate UPR^ER, which eventually confer chemoresistance and stem-like properties to BCs. Moreover, the increase in mtROS and PDI levels caused by HIF-2α knockdown and the subsequent UPR^ER inhibition could be substantially rescued by mitoTEMPOL (a mtROS scavenger), 16F16 (a PDI inhibitor), or GRP78 overexpression. Overall, we reported the critical roles of HIF-2α-SOD2-mtROS-PDI/GRP78-UPR^ER axis in mediating hypoxia-induced stemness in BCs, highlighting the interaction between organelles and providing evidence for further development of targeted HIF-2α inhibitor as a promising therapeutic strategy for chemoresistant breast cancer.

Background: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are involved in regulatory processes of ubiquitination and deubiquitination in various tumors at post-transcriptional epigenetic modification level. However, the underlying mechanism and its biological functions of circRNAs in the advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) remain obscure. Methods: RNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were applied to screen for circRNAs differentially expressed in LSCC tissues and cell lines. The candidate RNA-binding proteins and target signalling pathway were detected by RNA pull-down and mass spectrometry, in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), qRT-PCR assays, and bioinformatics analysis. The functional roles of these molecules were investigated using in vitro and in vivo experiments including EdU, transwell, wound healing, western blot assays, and the xenograft mice models. The molecular mechanisms were identified using RNA pull-down assays, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), Co-IP, ISH, Ubiquitination assay, bioinformatics analysis, and the rescue experiments. Results: Here, we unveil that microtubule cross-linking factor 1 circRNA (circMTCL1, circ0000825) exerts its critical oncogenic functions by promoting complement C1q-binding protein (C1QBP)-dependent ubiquitin degradation and subsequently activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling in laryngeal carcinoma initiation and development. Specifically, circMTCL1 was remarkably up-regulated in the paired tissues of patients with LSCC (n = 67), which predicted a worse clinical outcome. Functionally, circMTCL1 exerted oncogenic biological charactersistics by promoting cell proliferative capability and invasive and migrative abilities. Ectopic circMTCL1 augumented cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of LSCC cells, and this effect could be reversed by C1QBP knocking down in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, circMTCL1 directly recruited C1QBP protein by harboring the specific recognized sequence (+ 159 − + 210), thereby accelerating the translation of C1QBP expression by inhibiting its ubiquitin–proteasome-mediated degradation. Importantly, the direct interaction of C1QBP with β-catenin protein was enhanced via suppressing the β-catenin phosphorylation and accelerating its accumulation in cytoplasm and nucleus. Conclusion: Our findings manifested a novel circMTCL1-C1QBP-β-catenin signaling axis involving in LSCC tumorigenesis and progression, which shed new light on circRNAs-ubiquitous acidic glycoprotein mediated ubiquitin degradation and provided strategies and targets in the therapeutic intervention of LSCC.

Post‐translational modifications (PTMs) play a pivotal role in epigenetic regulation and are key pathways for modulating protein functionality. PTMs involve the covalent attachment of distinct chemical groups, such as succinyl, crotonyl, and lactyl, at specific protein sites, which alter protein structure, function, stability, and activity, ultimately influencing biological processes. Recently, metabolically derived short‐chain acylation modifications (with acyl groups containing fewer than six carbon atoms) have been progressively identified, such as butyrylation, succinylation, crotonylation, and lactylation, differing from traditional acetylation in structure, physicochemical properties, function, and regulation. Aberrant short‐chain acyl‐PTMs are often associated with tumorigenesis. Research highlights that PTMs like succinylation and lactylation are essential in regulating tumor metabolism, drug resistance, and immune responses. This review elucidates the regulatory mechanisms of eight short‐chain acyl‐PTMs—butyrylation, succinylation, crotonylation, malonylation, glutarylation, 2‐hydroxyisobutyrylation, β‐hydroxybutyrylation, and lactylation—that are involved in tumor initiation and progression. Their roles in controlling tumor genomic stability, gene transcription, protein stability, enzyme activity, and nuclear localization are summarized, demonstrating their impact on related biological processes such as tumor metabolism, multi‐drug resistance, and immune evasion. Additionally, the review provides an overview of current drug research targeting enzymes that regulate PTMs, offering critical insights to advance therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.