Data from global positioning system (GPS) ground-based receivers, ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs), and radiosondes (RS) at two high-latitude sites were compared. At one site, the North Slope of Alaska (NSA), Barrow, Alaska (USA), the instruments were co-located, while at the other site, the second ARM Mobile Facility (AMF2), Hyytiälä, Finland, the GPS receiver was located about 20 km away from the MWRs and RS. Differences between the GPS-derived integrated water vapor (IWV) and the other three instruments were analyzed in terms of mean differences and standard deviation. A comparison of co-located and near-located independently calibrated instruments allowed us to isolate issues that may be specific to a single system and, to some extent, to isolate the effects of the distance between the GPS receiver and the remaining instruments. The results showed that at these two high-latitude sites, when the IWV was less than 15 kg/m², the GPS agreed with other instruments within 0.5–0.7 kg/m². When the variability of water vapor was higher, mostly in the summer months, the GPS agreed with other instruments within 0.8–1 kg/m². The total random uncertainty between the GPS and the other systems was of the order of 0.6–1 kg/m² and was the dominant effect when the IWV was higher than 15 kg/m².

In this work, we examine data from a Global Positioning System (GPS) ground-based receiver, two co-located ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs), and radiosondes (RAOBs) to characterize the uncertainties associated with integrated water vapour (IWV) values estimated from the GPS in a sub-Arctic climate region. The experiment was carried out during the Biogenic Aerosols–Effects on Clouds and Climate research campaign conducted using the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program's second Mobile Facility (AMF2) in collaboration with the University of Helsinki. The GPS receiver was located about 20 km away from the AMF2 instruments (radiometers and RAOB). The GPS data were processed in Precise Point Positioning mode using the state-of-the-art scientific software GIPSY-OASIS II. Differences between the GPS-derived IWV and that derived from the other three instruments are analysed in terms of bias, standard deviation, and root-mean-square error (RMSE). The availability of three co-located, independently calibrated systems (two MWRs and one RAOB) allows us to isolate issues that may be specific to a single system and to isolate the effects of the distance between the GPS receiver and the remaining instruments. The representativeness error due to the 20-km distance between the GPS and the other systems is of the order of 0.6–1.5 kg/m² and in this study is the dominant effect when the IWV is higher than 20 kg/m². The RMSE between the instruments shows that in the sub-Arctic region, when the IWV variability is less than 20 kg/m², the GPS agrees with other instruments to within 0.5 kg/m². When the variability of water vapour in the 20-km region is higher than 20 kg/m², mostly in the summer months, the GPS agrees with other instruments within 1–2 kg/m².