Fernanda Pascon

Prof. Fernanda Pascon


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2012 in Journal of Biomedical Optics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFernanda Pascon
Fernanda Pascon
KKKamila Rosamilia Kantovitz
Kamila Rosamilia Kantovitz
LSLuís Eduardo Silva Soares
Luís Eduardo Silva Soares
ASAna Maria Do Espírito Santo
Ana Maria Do Espírito Santo
AMAirton Abrahão Martin
Airton Abrahão Martin
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANIRegina PUPPIN-RONTANI
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANI
We examine the morphological and chemical changes in the pulp chamber dentin after using endodontic agents by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy (FT-Raman), and micro energy-dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectrometry (μEDXRF). Thirty teeth were sectioned exposing the pulp chamber and divided by six groups (n=5): NT-no treatment; CHX-2% chlorhexidine; CHXE-2% chlorhexidine+17% EDTA; E-17% EDTA; SH5-5.25% NaOCl; SH5E-5.25% NaOCl+17% EDTA. The inorganic and organic content was analyzed by FT-Raman. μEDXRF examined calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) content as well as Ca/P ratio. Impressions of specimens were evaluated by SEM. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p<0.05). Differences were observed among groups for the 960  cm−1 peak. Ca and P content differences were significant (SH5>NT=SH5E>CHX>E>CHXE). CHXE and E presented the highest Ca/P ratio values compared to the other groups (p<0.05). The SEM images in the EDTA-treated groups had the highest number of open tubules. Erosion in the tubules was observed in CHX and SH5E groups. Endodontic agents change the inorganic and organic content of pulp chamber dentin. NaOCl used alone, or in association with EDTA, was the most effective agent considering chemical and morphological approaches.

1 November 2020 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LFLívia Nazareth Ferreira
Lívia Nazareth Ferreira
RPRegina Maria Puppin-Rontani
Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani
FPFernanda Pascon
Fernanda Pascon

1 June 2016 in Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LILuciana Tiemi Inagaki
Luciana Tiemi Inagaki
VDVanessa Benetello Dainezi
Vanessa Benetello Dainezi
RARoberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso
Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso
APAndréia Bolzan de Paula
Andréia Bolzan de Paula
FGFranklin Garcia-Godoy
Franklin Garcia-Godoy
FPFernanda Pascon
Fernanda Pascon

8 May 2015 in Microscopy and Microanalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBruna M. Costa
Bruna M. Costa
AIAlexsandra S. Iwamoto
Alexsandra S. Iwamoto
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANIRegina PUPPIN-RONTANI
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANI
FPFernanda Pascon
Fernanda Pascon
This study evaluated the structural and morphological differences between human and bovine primary root canals. Primary human maxillary central incisors (H) (n=9) and primary bovine incisors (B) (n=9) were selected. The roots were sectioned in the vestibular-lingual direction, planed and delimited in cervical, middle, and apical thirds. Tubule density (number of tubules per mm2) and diameter were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (1,000 and 5,000×) using Image J 1.47 software. Data were submitted to two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). The highest tubule density was observed for B (28.527±1.717 mm2) compared with H (15.931±0.170 mm2) (p<0.01). Regarding root thirds, the cervical third presented a greater tubule density (26.417±11.654 mm2) than the apical third (17.999±5.873 mm2). The diameter of the dentin tubules was not different for cervical (3.50±0.08 µm), middle (3.45±0.30 µm) and apical thirds (3.42±0.33 µm) and substrate (H—3.29±0.14 µm; B—3.63±0.06 µm). It could be concluded that: (1) the radicular dentin structure of human and bovine primary teeth and root thirds differ in terms of the tubule density; (2) the radicular dentin morphology of human and bovine primary teeth and root thirds are similar in terms of the diameter of the dentin tubules.

1 December 2016 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LILuciana Tiemi Inagaki
Luciana Tiemi Inagaki
RARoberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso
Roberta Caroline Bruschi Alonso
GAGiovana Albamonte Spagnolo Araújo
Giovana Albamonte Spagnolo Araújo
ESEduardo José Carvalho de Souza-Junior
Eduardo José Carvalho de Souza-Junior
PAPaula Cristina Anibal
Paula Cristina Anibal
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANIRegina PUPPIN-RONTANI
Regina PUPPIN-RONTANI

1 October 2017 in Dental Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRaquel Viana Rodrigues
Raquel Viana Rodrigues
MGMarcelo Giannini
Marcelo Giannini
FPFernanda Pascon
Fernanda Pascon
PPPreety Panwar
Preety Panwar
DBDieter Bromme
Dieter Bromme
RCRicardo Marins de Carvalho
Ricardo Marins de Carvalho