Katya Jay

Ms. Katya Jay

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2019 in Diversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSally Hacker
Sally Hacker
KJKatya Jay
Katya Jay
NCNicholas Cohn
Nicholas Cohn
EGEvan Goldstein
Evan Goldstein
PHPaige A. Hovenga
Paige A. Hovenga
PRPeter Ruggiero
Peter Ruggiero
Coastal dunes arise from feedbacks between vegetation and sediment supply. Species-specific differences in plant functional morphology affect sand capture and dune shape. In this study, we build on research showing a relationship between dune grass species and dune geomorphology on the US central Atlantic Coast. This study seeks to determine the ways in which four co-occurring dune grass species (Ammophila breviligulata, Panicum amarum, Spartina patens, Uniola paniculata) differ in their functional morphology and sand accretion. We surveyed the biogeography, functional morphology, and associated change in sand elevation of the four dune grass species along a 320-kilometer distance across the Outer Banks. We found that A. breviligulata had dense and clumped shoots, which correlated with the greatest sand accretion. Coupled with fast lateral spread, it tends to build tall and wide foredunes. Uniola paniculata had fewer but taller shoots and was associated with ~42% lower sand accretion. Coupled with slow lateral spread, it tends to build steeper and narrower dunes. Panicum amarum had similar shoot densities and associated sand accretion to U. paniculata despite its shorter shoots, suggesting that shoot density is more important than morphology. Finally, we hypothesize, given the distributions of the grass species, that foredunes may be taller and wider and have better coastal protection properties in the north where A. breviligulata is dominant. If under a warming climate A. breviligulata experiences a range shift to the north, as appears to be occurring with U. paniculata, changes in grass dominance and foredune morphology could make for more vulnerable coastlines.

8 June 2018 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEvan Goldstein
Evan Goldstein
EMElsemarie V. Mullins
Elsemarie V. Mullins
LMLaura J. Moore
Laura J. Moore
RBReuben G. Biel
Reuben G. Biel
JBJoseph Brown
Joseph Brown
JZJulie C. Zinnert
Julie C. Zinnert
Previous work on the US Atlantic coast has generally shown that coastal foredunes are dominated by two dune grass species,Ammophila breviligulata(American beachgrass) andUniola paniculata(sea oats). From Virginia northward,A. breviligulatadominates, whileU. paniculatais the dominant grass south of Virginia. Previous work suggests that these grasses influence the shape of coastal foredunes in species-specific ways, and that they respond differently to environmental stressors; thus, it is important to know which species dominates a given dune system. The range boundaries of these two species remains unclear given the lack of comprehensive surveys. In an attempt to determine these boundaries, we conducted a literature survey of 98 studies that either stated the range limits and/or included field-based studies/observations of the two grass species. We then produced an interactive map that summarizes the locations of the surveyed papers and books. The literature review suggests that the current southern range limit forA. breviligulatais Cape Fear, NC, and the northern range limit forU. paniculatais Assateague Island, on the Maryland and Virginia border. Our data suggest a northward expansion ofU. paniculata,possibly associated with warming trends observed near the northern range limit in Painter, VA. In contrast, the data regarding a range shift forA. breviligulataremain inconclusive. We also compare our literature-based map with geolocated records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and iNaturalist research grade crowd-sourced observations. We intend for our literature-based map to aid coastal researchers who are interested in the dynamics of these two species and the potential for their ranges to shift as a result of climate change.

3 October 2022 in Ecosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KJKatya Jay
Katya Jay
SHSally Hacker
Sally Hacker
PHPaige A. Hovenga
Paige A. Hovenga
LMLaura J. Moore
Laura J. Moore
PRPeter Ruggiero
Peter Ruggiero
Coastal foredunes form via biophysical feedbacks between sand accretion and burial‐tolerant vegetation and can protect coastlines from hazards such as extreme storms and sea level rise. Predicting how coastal dunes, and the services they provide, will change in the future requires an understanding of the relative roles of the physical and ecological processes that shape their structure and function. Here we assess the relative roles of sand supply, beach morphology, and vegetation in determining foredune morphology, and its change, along a 300‐km stretch of the US Central Atlantic coast. In particular, we used the spatial variability inherent in beaches and dunes of this region to determine the relative importance of shoreline change rate (SCR; a proxy for sand supply to the beach), beach morphology, and grass density of four widespread dune grasses (Uniola paniculata, Ammophila breviligulata, Panicum amarum, and Spartina patens) to foredune morphology metrics (height, width, and aspect ratio) along the North Carolina Outer Banks barrier islands. Foredune morphology and change metrics are correlated with three main factors: multidecadal SCR (1997–2016), beach slope, and dune grass density and species identity. Multidecadal SCR and beach width explained the most variation in, and were positively correlated with, foredune height and width, and were negatively correlated with foredune aspect ratio (height divided by width). In addition, grass density and changes in grass density contributed significantly to foredune morphology change. We found a positive relationship between change in A. breviligulata density and foredune width, which aligns with previous studies on the US Atlantic and Pacific Northwest coasts. Our results demonstrate the interactive roles of beach sand supply and dune grass functional morphology in dune building processes on highly vulnerable coastlines.

12 February 2025 in Estuaries and Coasts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKatya Jay
Katya Jay
SHSally D. Hacker
Sally D. Hacker
CHCedric J. Hagen
Cedric J. Hagen
JSJohn Stepanek
John Stepanek
LMLaura J. Moore
Laura J. Moore
PRPeter Ruggiero
Peter Ruggiero
Coastal ecosystems such as mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrasses sequester large amounts of carbon per unit area due to their high productivity and sediment accumulation rates. However, only a handful of studies have examined carbon sequestration in coastal dunes, which are shaped by biophysical feedback between aeolian sediment transport and burial-tolerant vegetation. The goal of this study was to measure carbon storage and identify the factors that influence its variability along the foredunes of the US Outer Banks barrier islands of North Carolina. Specifically, differences in carbon stocks (above- and belowground biomass and sand), dune grass abundance, and sand supply were measured among islands, cross-shore dune profile locations, and dune grass species. Carbon varied among aboveground grass biomass (0.1 ± 0.1 kg C m−2), belowground grass biomass (1.1 ± 1.6 kg C m−3), and sand (0.9 ± 0.6 kg C m−3), with the largest amount in belowground grass stocks. Aboveground grass carbon stocks were comparable to those in eelgrass beds and salt marshes on a per-area basis, while sediment carbon values in our study system were lower than those in other coastal systems, including other dune locations. Additionally, sand carbon density was positively related to patterns in dune sand supply and grass abundance, reflecting a self-reinforcing vegetation-sediment feedback at both high and low sand accumulation rates.

27 October 2023 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KJKatya Jay
Katya Jay
WWW. R. Wieder
W. R. Wieder
SSS. C. Swenson
S. C. Swenson
JKJ. F. Knowles
J. F. Knowles
SES. C. Elmendorf
S. C. Elmendorf
KSK. N. Suding
K. N. Suding

19 November 2025 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KJKatya Jay
Katya Jay
WWWilliam R. Wieder
William R. Wieder
SESarah C. Elmendorf
Sarah C. Elmendorf
MSMarko J. Spasojevic
Marko J. Spasojevic
KSKatharine N. Suding
Katharine N. Suding