Celine Murrin

Dr. Celine Murrin

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Meat Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLiran C. Shan
Liran C. Shan
Aoife De BrúnAoife De Brún
Aoife De Brún
MHMaeve Henchion
Maeve Henchion
CLChenguang Li
Chenguang Li
Celine MurrinCeline Murrin
Celine Murrin
FMFrank Monahan
Frank Monahan

25 January 2012 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Celine MurrinCeline Murrin
Celine Murrin
GKGabrielle Kelly
Gabrielle Kelly
RTRichard E Tremblay
Richard E Tremblay
CKCecily C Kelleher
Cecily C Kelleher
Obesity and its measure of body mass index are strongly determined by parental body size. Debate continues as to whether both parents contribute equally to offspring body mass which is key to understanding the aetiology of the disease. The aim of this study was to use cohort data from three generations of one family to examine the relative maternal and paternal associations with offspring body mass index and how these associations compare with family height to demonstrate evidence of genetic or environmental cross-generational transmission.

24 April 2013 in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Celine MurrinCeline Murrin
Celine Murrin
ASA Shrivastava
A Shrivastava
CKC C Kelleher
C C Kelleher
FGfor the Lifeways Cross-generation Cohort Study Steering Group
for the Lifeways Cross-generation Cohort Study Steering Group

24 October 2022 in Obesity Facts
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCathy Breen
Cathy Breen
JOJean O’cOnnell
Jean O’cOnnell
JGJustin Geoghegan
Justin Geoghegan
DODonal O’sHea
Donal O’sHea
SBSusie Birney
Susie Birney
RYRuth Yoder
Ruth Yoder
Background: This Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the management of obesity in adults in Ireland, adapted from the Canadian CPG, defines obesity as a complex chronic disease characterised by excess or dysfunctional adiposity that impairs health. The guideline reflects substantial advances in the understanding of the determinants, pathophysiology, assessment, and treatment of obesity. Summary: It shifts the focus of obesity management toward improving patient-centred health outcomes, functional outcomes, and social and economic participation, rather than weight loss alone. It gives recommendations for care that are underpinned by evidence-based principles of chronic disease management; validate patients’ lived experiences; move beyond simplistic approaches of “eat less, move more” and address the root drivers of obesity. Key Messages: People living with obesity face substantial bias and stigma, which contribute to increased morbidity and mortality independent of body weight. Education is needed for all healthcare professionals in Ireland to address the gap in skills, increase knowledge of evidence-based practice, and eliminate bias and stigma in healthcare settings. We call for people living with obesity in Ireland to have access to evidence-informed care, including medical, medical nutrition therapy, physical activity and physical rehabilitation interventions, psychological interventions, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. This can be best achieved by resourcing and fully implementing the Model of Care for the Management of Adult Overweight and Obesity. To address health inequalities, we also call for the inclusion of obesity in the Structured Chronic Disease Management Programme and for pharmacotherapy reimbursement, to ensure equal access to treatment based on health-need rather than ability to pay.

1 December 2018 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLing-Wei Chen
Ling-Wei Chen
RFRoisin Fitzgerald
Roisin Fitzgerald
Celine MurrinCeline Murrin
Celine Murrin
JMJohn Mehegan
John Mehegan
CKCecily C Kelleher
Cecily C Kelleher
Catherine PhillipsCatherine Phillips
Catherine Phillips
Maternal caffeine intake is associated with adverse birth outcomes, but in most studies the primary caffeine source is coffee; the influence of tea caffeine remains unclear. The aim of the study was to examine the association between maternal caffeine intake and birth outcomes in a population with tea as the predominant caffeine source. Data from 941 Irish mother-child pairs of the Lifeways Cross Generation Cohort Study were examined. Maternal dietary intakes in early pregnancy were assessed using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Caffeine intake was derived from coffee, tea, soft drinks, and cocoa-containing foods and beverages. Associations of maternal caffeine intake with continuous (birth weight, birth length, and gestational age) and binary [low birth weight (LBW) (<2500 g) and preterm birth (PB) (<37 wk gestational age)] birth outcomes were investigated using multiple linear and logistic regressions, respectively, with adjustment for potential confounders. Tea was the predominant caffeine source (48%), followed by coffee (39%). In the fully adjusted model, maternal caffeine intake was associated with lower birth weight [β (95% CI): -71.9 (-105.4, -38.4) g · 100 mg-1 · d-1 caffeine increment], shorter birth length [-0.30 (-0.49, -0.11) cm], smaller head circumference [-0.12 (-0.24, -0.01) cm], and shorter gestational age [-0.13 (-0.25, -0.02) wk]; higher risks for LBW [OR (95% CI): 1.47 (1.14, 1.90)] and PB [1.36 (1.07, 1.74)] were also observed (all P < 0.05). The associations were robust to the exclusion of participants with pregnancy complications and in never smokers. Similar higher risks of adverse birth outcomes were observed for the highest caffeine intake categories from coffee [ORLBW: 3.10 (1.08, 8.89); ORPB: 2.74 (1.05, 7.16)] and tea [ORLBW: 2.47 (1.02, 6.01); ORPB: 2.56 (1.14, 5.75)], compared with the lowest intake categories (all P < 0.05). Maternal caffeine intake from both coffee and tea is associated with adverse birth outcomes. This prospective observational study was registered at ISRCTN Registry as ISRCTN16537904.

27 February 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Silvia Bel-SerratSilvia Bel-Serrat
Silvia Bel-Serrat
AOAna Ojeda-Rodríguez
Ana Ojeda-Rodríguez
MHMirjam M. Heinen
Mirjam M. Heinen
MBMarta Buoncristiano
Marta Buoncristiano
SAShynar Abdrakhmanova
Shynar Abdrakhmanova
JBJoão Breda
João Breda
It is unclear how dietary, physical activity and sedentary behaviors co-occur in school-aged children. We investigated the clustering of energy balance-related behaviors and whether the identified clusters were associated with weight status. Participants were 6- to 9-year-old children (n = 63,215, 49.9% girls) from 19 countries participating in the fourth round (2015/2017) of the World Health Organization (WHO) European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative. Energy balance-related behaviors were parentally reported. Weight and height were objectively measured. We performed cluster analysis separately per group of countries (North Europe, East Europe, South Europe/Mediterranean countries and West-Central Asia). Seven clusters were identified in each group. Healthier clusters were common across groups. The pattern of distribution of healthy and unhealthy behaviors within each cluster was group specific. Associations between the clustering of energy balance-related behaviors and weight status varied per group. In South Europe/Mediterranean countries and East Europe, all or most of the cluster solutions were associated with higher risk of overweight/obesity when compared with the cluster ‘Physically active and healthy diet’. Few or no associations were observed in North Europe and West-Central Asia, respectively. These findings support the hypothesis that unfavorable weight status is associated with a particular combination of energy balance-related behavior patterns, but only in some groups of countries.