Ray Owens

Prof. Dr. Ray Owens

Research Complex at Harwell, R92 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot OX11 0FA, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2007 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNick S. Berrow
Nick S. Berrow
DADavid Alderton
David Alderton
SSSarah Sainsbury
Sarah Sainsbury
JNJoanne Nettleship
Joanne Nettleship
RARene Assenberg
Rene Assenberg
Ray OwensRay Owens
Ray Owens
This article describes the construction of a set of versatile expression vectors based on the In-Fusion™ cloning enzyme and their use for high-throughput cloning and expression screening. Modifications to commonly used vectors rendering them compatible with In-Fusion™ has produced a ligation-independent cloning system that is (1) insert sequence independent (2) capable of cloning large PCR fragments (3) efficient over a wide (20-fold) insert concentration range and (4) applicable to expression in multiple hosts. The system enables the precise engineering of (His6-) tagged constructs with no undesirable vector or restriction-site-derived amino acids added to the expressed protein. The use of a multiple host-enabled vector allows rapid screening in both E. coli and eukaryotic hosts (HEK293T cells and insect cell hosts, e.g. Sf9 cells). These high-throughput screening activities have prompted the development and validation of automated protocols for transfection of mammalian cells and Ni-NTA protein purification.

26 May 2005 in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWThomas S. Walter
Thomas S. Walter
JDJonathan M. Diprose
Jonathan M. Diprose
CMChris J. Mayo
Chris J. Mayo
CSChristian Siebold
Christian Siebold
MPMike G. Pickford
Mike G. Pickford
KHKarl Harlos
Karl Harlos
Crystallization trials at the Division of Structural Biology in Oxford are now almost exclusively carried out using a high-throughput workflow implemented in the Oxford Protein Production Facility. Initial crystallization screening is based on nanolitre-scale sitting-drop vapour-diffusion experiments (typically 100 nl of protein plus 100 nl of reservoir solution per droplet) which use standard crystallization screening kits and 96-well crystallization plates. For 294 K crystallization trials the barcoded crystallization plates are entered into an automated storage system with a fully integrated imaging system. These plates are imaged in accordance with a pre-programmed schedule and the resulting digital data for each droplet are harvested into a laboratory information-management system (LIMS), scored by crystal recognition software and displayed for user analysis via a web-based interface. Currently, storage for trials at 277 K is not automated and for imaging the crystallization plates are fed by hand into an imaging system from which the data enter the LIMS. The workflow includes two procedures for nanolitre-scale optimization of crystallization conditions: (i) a protocol for variation of pH, reservoir dilution and protein:reservoir ratio and (ii) an additive screen. Experience based on 592 crystallization projects is reported.

1 March 2007 in Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VCVeronica T. Chang
Veronica T. Chang
MCMax Crispin
Max Crispin
AAA. Radu Aricescu
A. Radu Aricescu
DHDavid J. Harvey
David J. Harvey
JNJoanne E. Nettleship
Joanne E. Nettleship
SDSimon J. Davis
Simon J. Davis
Glycoproteins present special problems for structural genomic analysis because they often require glycosylation in order to fold correctly, whereas their chemical and conformational heterogeneity generally inhibits crystallization. We show that the "glycosylation problem" can be solved by expressing glycoproteins transiently in mammalian cells in the presence of the N-glycosylation processing inhibitors, kifunensine or swainsonine. This allows the correct folding of the glycoproteins, but leaves them sensitive to enzymes, such as endoglycosidase H, that reduce the N-glycans to single residues, enhancing crystallization. Since the scalability of transient mammalian expression is now comparable to that of bacterial systems, this approach should relieve one of the major bottlenecks in structural genomic analysis.

31 July 2020 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DZDaming Zhou
Daming Zhou
HDHelen M. E. Duyvesteyn
Helen M. E. Duyvesteyn
CCCheng-Pin Chen
Cheng-Pin Chen
CHChung-Guei Huang
Chung-Guei Huang
TCTing-Hua Chen
Ting-Hua Chen
KHKuan-Ying A. Huang
Kuan-Ying A. Huang
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented health and economic impact and there are currently no approved therapies. We have isolated an antibody, EY6A, from an individual convalescing from COVID-19 and have shown that it neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 and cross-reacts with SARS-CoV-1. EY6A Fab binds the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the viral spike glycoprotein tightly (KD of 2 nM), and a 2.6-Å-resolution crystal structure of an RBD–EY6A Fab complex identifies the highly conserved epitope, away from the ACE2 receptor binding site. Residues within this footprint are key to stabilizing the pre-fusion spike. Cryo-EM analyses of the pre-fusion spike incubated with EY6A Fab reveal a complex of the intact spike trimer with three Fabs bound and two further multimeric forms comprising the destabilized spike attached to Fab. EY6A binds what is probably a major neutralizing epitope, making it a candidate therapeutic for COVID-19.

27 June 2017 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CTChristian Tiede
Christian Tiede
RBRobert Bedford
Robert Bedford
SHSophie J Heseltine
Sophie J Heseltine
GSGina Smith
Gina Smith
IWImeshi Wijetunga
Imeshi Wijetunga
DTDarren Charles Tomlinson
Darren Charles Tomlinson
Molecular recognition reagents are key tools for understanding biological processes and are used universally by scientists to study protein expression, localisation and interactions. Antibodies remain the most widely used of such reagents and many show excellent performance, although some are poorly characterised or have stability or batch variability issues, supporting the use of alternative binding proteins as complementary reagents for many applications. Here we report on the use of Affimer proteins as research reagents. We selected 12 diverse molecular targets for Affimer selection to exemplify their use in common molecular and cellular applications including the (a) selection against various target molecules; (b) modulation of protein function in vitro and in vivo; (c) labelling of tumour antigens in mouse models; and (d) use in affinity fluorescence and super-resolution microscopy. This work shows that Affimer proteins, as is the case for other alternative binding scaffolds, represent complementary affinity reagents to antibodies for various molecular and cell biology applications.

17 June 2002 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWTommy Wan
Tommy Wan
RBRebecca L. Beavil
Rebecca L. Beavil
SFStella M. Fabiane
Stella M. Fabiane
ABAndrew J. Beavil
Andrew J. Beavil
MSManinder K. Sohi
Maninder K. Sohi
BSBrian J. Sutton
Brian J. Sutton