Palliative care is gaining ground globally and is endorsed in high-level policy commitments, but service provision, supporting policies, education, and funding are incommensurate with rapidly growing needs. The objective of this study was to describe current levels of global palliative care development and report on changes since 2006. An online survey of experts in 198 countries generated 2017 data on 10 indicators of palliative care provision, fitted to six categories of development. Factor analysis and discriminant analysis showed the validity of the categorization. Spearman correlation analyses assessed the relationship with World Bank Income Level (WBIL), Human Development Index (HDI), and Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Numbers (percentages) of countries in each development category were as follows: 1) no known palliative care activity, 47 (24%); 2) capacity-building, 13 (7%); 3a) isolated provision, 65 (33%); 3b) generalized provision, 22 (11%); 4a) preliminary integration into mainstream provision, 21 (11%); 4b) advanced integration, 30 (15%). Development levels were significantly associated with WBIL (rS = 0.4785), UHC (rS = 0.5558), and HDI (rS = 0.5426) with P < 0.001. Net improvement between 2006 and 2017 saw 32 fewer countries in Categories 1/2, 16 more countries in 3a/3b, and 17 more countries in 4a/4b. Palliative care at the highest level of provision is available for only 14% of the global population and is concentrated in European countries. An 87% global increase in serious health-related suffering amenable to palliative care interventions is predicted by 2060. With an increasing need, palliative care is not reaching the levels required by at least half of the global population.

Summary: The graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) characteristics of 150 consecutive patients undergoing reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic (allo‐RIC) transplants and 88 patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen were analysed. All patients received the same GVHD prophylaxis and peripheral blood stem cells from a human leucocyte antigen identical sibling. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 67% and 44% in the myeloablative and allo‐RIC regimen groups, respectively (P < 0·001), and was 39% vs. 29%, respectively (P = 0·043), for grades 2–4 aGVHD. Only conditioning type (myeloablative versus allo‐RIC) significantly influenced the incidence of aGVHD in multivariate analysis: Hazard ratio (HR) = 2·16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1·52–3·07], P < 0·0001. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 63% and 71% among myeloablative and allo‐RIC patients respectively (P = 0·084). This trend was because of the higher incidence of limited cGVHD, but not extensive cGVHD among allo‐RIC recipients [HR = 3·3 (95% CI: 1·42–8·08), P = 0·0017]. Moreover, among patients who developed cGVHD, the cumulative incidence of limited cGVHD was significantly lower in the myeloablative group than in the allo‐RIC group (7% vs. 25%, P = 0·007). Duration of immunosuppression was shorter among allo‐RIC patients (35·5% vs. 68·8% required systemic immunosuppression 36 months after transplant, P = 0·028). Although prospective controlled trials are required to further evaluate the effect of the conditioning regimen on GVHD, our results suggest that RIC modifies the incidence and characteristics of both acute and cGVHD after allogeneic transplantation, and decreases the immunosuppression requirements in long‐term follow up when compared with myeloablative conditioning.

Service provision is a key domain to assess national-level palliative care development. Three editions of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Atlas of Palliative Care monitored the changes in service provision across Europe since 2005. To study European trends of specialized service provision at home care teams, hospital support teams, and inpatient palliative care services between 2005 and 2019. Secondary analysis was conducted drawing from databases on the number of specialized services in 2005, 2012, and 2019. Ratios of services per 100,000 inhabitants and increase rates on number of services for three periods were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses were conducted to determine significant changes and chi-square to identify countries accounting for the variance. Income-level and sub-regional ANOVA analysis were undertaken. 51 countries. Forty-two countries (82%) increased the number of specialized services between 2005 and 2019 with changes for home care teams (104% increase-rate), inpatient services (82%), and hospital support teams (48%). High-income countries showed significant increase in all types of services (p < 0.001), while low-to-middle-income countries showed significant increase only for inpatient services. Central–Eastern European countries showed significant improvement in home care teams and inpatient services, while Western countries showed significant improvement in hospital support and home care teams. Home care was the most prominent service in Western Europe. Specialized service provision increased throughout Europe, yet ratios per 100,000 inhabitants fell below the EAPC recommendations. Western Europe ratios’ achieved half of the suggested services, while Central–Eastern countries achieved only a fourth. High-income countries and Western European countries account for the major increase. Central–Eastern Europe and low-to-middle-income countries reported little increase on specialized service provision.