Aims: Sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 ( SGLT2 ) reabsorbs glucose and sodium in the renal proximal tubule. Dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, targets hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes by increasing renal glucose excretion. To investigate whether the parallel occurring sodium loss would have diuretic‐like physiologic effects, we compared dapagliflozin and hydrochlorothiazide ( HCTZ ) effects on 24‐h blood pressure ( BP ), body weight, plasma volume and glomerular filtration rate ( GFR ). Methods: In this randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial, 75 subjects with type 2 diabetes were assigned placebo, dapagliflozin 10 mg/day, or HCTZ 25 mg/day. Changes from baseline BP, body weight, plasma volume and GFR were assessed after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: Subjects' mean age was 56 years, type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) duration 6.3 years, and haemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) 7.5%. Treatment with placebo, dapagliflozin or HCTZ resulted in changes from baseline in 24‐h ambulatory mean systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) of −0.9 (95% CI −4.2, +2.4), −3.3 (95% CI −6.8, +0.2), and −6.6 (95% CI −9.9, −3.2) mmHg , respectively at week 12, adjusted for baseline SBP . Body weight decreased with dapagliflozin and HCTZ . In a sub‐study plasma volume appeared to decrease with dapagliflozin but did not change with placebo or HCTZ treatment. Dapagliflozin induced a greater reduction in GFR (−10.8%; 95% CI −14.6, −6.7) relative to placebo (−2.9%; 95% CI −6.9, +1.2) or HCTZ (−3.4%; 95% CI −7.3, +0.6). Conclusions: Dapagliflozin‐induced SGLT2 inhibition for 12 weeks is associated with reductions in 24‐h BP , body weight, GFR and possibly plasma volume. Cumulatively, these effects suggest that dapagliflozin may have a diuretic‐like capacity to lower BP in addition to beneficial effects on glycaemic control.

Aims/hypothesis The sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor canagliflozin slows progression of kidney function decline in type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin on biomarkers for progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods A canagliflozin mechanism of action (MoA) network model was constructed based on an in vitro transcriptomics experiment in human proximal tubular cells and molecular features linked to SGLT2 inhibitors from scientific literature. This model was mapped onto an established DKD network model that describes molecular processes associated with DKD. Overlapping areas in both networks were subsequently used to select candidate biomarkers that change with canagliflozin therapy. These biomarkers were measured in 296 stored plasma samples from a previously reported 2 year clinical trial comparing canagliflozin with glimepiride. Results Forty-four proteins present in the canagliflozin MoA molecular model overlapped with proteins in the DKD network model. These proteins were considered candidates for monitoring impact of canagliflozin on DKD pathophysiology. For ten of these proteins, scientific evidence was available suggesting that they are involved in DKD progression. Of these, compared with glimepiride, canagliflozin 300 mg/day decreased plasma levels of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1; 9.2%; p < 0.001), IL-6 (26.6%; p = 0.010), matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7; 24.9%; p = 0.011) and fibronectin 1 (FN1; 14.9%; p = 0.055) during 2 years of follow-up. Conclusions/interpretation The observed reduction in TNFR1, IL-6, MMP7 and FN1 suggests that canagliflozin contributes to reversing molecular processes related to inflammation, extracellular matrix turnover and fibrosis. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00968812

BACKGROUND: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (ns-MRA) finerenone all individually reduce cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria. However, the lifetime benefits of combination therapy with these medicines are not known. METHODS: We used data from 2 SGLT2i trials (CANVAS [Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment] and CREDENCE [Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation]), 2 ns-MRA trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] and FIGARO-DKD [Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Clinical Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease]), and 8 GLP-1 RA trials to estimate the relative effects of combination therapy versus conventional care (renin-angiotensin system blockade and traditional risk factor control) on cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality outcomes. Using actuarial methods, we then estimated absolute risk reductions with combination SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least moderately increased albuminuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g) by applying estimated combination treatment effects to participants receiving conventional care in CANVAS and CREDENCE. RESULTS: Compared with conventional care, the combination of SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.55–0.76) for major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death). The corresponding estimated absolute risk reduction over 3 years was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.0–5.7), with a number needed to treat of 23 (95% CI, 18–33). For a 50-year-old patient commencing combination therapy, estimated major adverse cardiovascular event–free survival was 21.1 years compared with 17.9 years for conventional care (3.2 years gained [95% CI, 2.1–4.3]). There were also projected gains in survival free from hospitalized heart failure (3.2 years [95% CI, 2.4–4.0]), chronic kidney disease progression (5.5 years [95% CI, 4.0–6.7]), cardiovascular death (2.2 years [95% CI, 1.2–3.0]), and all-cause death (2.4 years [95% CI, 1.4–3.4]). Attenuated but clinically relevant gains in event-free survival were observed in analyses assuming 50% additive effects of combination therapy, including for major adverse cardiovascular events (2.4 years [95% CI, 1.1–3.5]), chronic kidney disease progression (4.5 years [95% CI, 2.8–5.9]), and all-cause death (1.8 years [95% CI, 0.7–2.8]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and at least moderately increased albuminuria, combination treatment of SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA has the potential to afford relevant gains in cardiovascular and kidney event-free and overall survival.

Limited evidence exists to support the simultaneous initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in persons with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. We randomly assigned participants with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30 to 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m² of body-surface area), albuminuria (a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 100 to ≤5000 [with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams]), and type 2 diabetes, who were already taking a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive finerenone (with empagliflozin-matching placebo) at a dose of 10 or 20 mg per day, empagliflozin at a dose of 10 mg per day (with finerenone-matching placebo), or a combination of finerenone and empagliflozin. The primary outcome was the relative change in the log-transformed mean urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to 180 days. Safety was assessed. At baseline, the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was similar among the participants in the three groups; the median value was 579 (interquartile range, 292 to 1092) among those with available data (265 in the combination-therapy group, 258 in the finerenone group, and 261 participants in the empagliflozin group). At day 180, the reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio with combination therapy was 29% greater than that with finerenone alone (least-squares mean ratio of the difference in the change from baseline, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.82; P<0.001) and 32% greater than that with empagliflozin alone (least-squares mean ratio of the difference in the change from baseline, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.79; P<0.001). Neither agent, alone or in combination, led to unexpected adverse events. Symptomatic hypotension, acute kidney injury, and hyperkalemia leading to drug discontinuation were uncommon. Among persons with both chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, initial therapy with finerenone plus empagliflozin led to a greater reduction in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio than either treatment alone. (Funded by Bayer; CONFIDENCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05254002.).

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition with canagliflozin decreases HbA1c, body weight, BP, and albuminuria, implying that canagliflozin confers renoprotection. We determined whether canagliflozin decreases albuminuria and reduces renal function decline independently of its glycemic effects in a secondary analysis of a clinical trial in 1450 patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin and randomly assigned to either once-daily canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg, or glimepiride uptitrated to 6–8 mg. End points were annual change in eGFR and albuminuria over 2 years of follow-up. Glimepiride, canagliflozin 100 mg, and canagliflozin 300 mg groups had eGFR declines of 3.3 ml/min per 1.73 m² per year (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.8 to 3.8), 0.5 ml/min per 1.73 m² per year (95% CI, 0.0 to 1.0), and 0.9 ml/min per 1.73 m² per year (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.4), respectively (P<0.01 for each canagliflozin group versus glimepiride). In the subgroup of patients with baseline urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio decreased more with canagliflozin 100 mg (31.7%; 95% CI, 8.6% to 48.9%; P=0.01) or canagliflozin 300 mg (49.3%; 95% CI, 31.9% to 62.2%; P<0.001) than with glimepiride. Patients receiving glimepiride, canagliflozin 100 mg, or canagliflozin 300 mg had reductions in HbA1c of 0.81%, 0.82%, and 0.93%, respectively, at 1 year and 0.55%, 0.65%, and 0.74%, respectively, at 2 years. In conclusion, canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg/d, compared with glimepiride, slowed the progression of renal disease over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes, and canagliflozin may confer renoprotective effects independently of its glycemic effects.