Jiangwa Xing

Jiangwa Xing


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FTFarah Tasnim
Farah Tasnim
JXJiangwa Xing
Jiangwa Xing
XHXiaozhong Huang
Xiaozhong Huang
SMShupei Mo
Shupei Mo
XWXiaona Wei
Xiaona Wei
HYHanry Yu
Hanry Yu

30 October 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYang Yu
Yang Yu
JWJiahao Wang
Jiahao Wang
CNChan Way Ng
Chan Way Ng
YMYukun Ma
Yukun Ma
SMShupei Mo
Shupei Mo
HYHanry Yu
Hanry Yu
Current liver fibrosis scoring by computer-assisted image analytics is not fully automated as it requires manual preprocessing (segmentation and feature extraction) typically based on domain knowledge in liver pathology. Deep learning-based algorithms can potentially classify these images without the need for preprocessing through learning from a large dataset of images. We investigated the performance of classification models built using a deep learning-based algorithm pre-trained using multiple sources of images to score liver fibrosis and compared them against conventional non-deep learning-based algorithms - artificial neural networks (ANN), multinomial logistic regression (MLR), support vector machines (SVM) and random forests (RF). Automated feature classification and fibrosis scoring were achieved by using a transfer learning-based deep learning network, AlexNet-Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), with balanced area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values of up to 0.85–0.95 versus ANN (AUROC of up to 0.87–1.00), MLR (AUROC of up to 0.73–1.00), SVM (AUROC of up to 0.69–0.99) and RF (AUROC of up to 0.94–0.99). Results indicate that a deep learning-based algorithm with transfer learning enables the construction of a fully automated and accurate prediction model for scoring liver fibrosis stages that is comparable to other conventional non-deep learning-based algorithms that are not fully automated.

1 November 2017 in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZiwei Song
Ziwei Song
KGkapish gupta
kapish gupta
INInn Chuan Ng
Inn Chuan Ng
JXJiangwa Xing
Jiangwa Xing
YYYi An Yang
Yi An Yang
HYHanry Yu
Hanry Yu


21 June 2019 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DZDerui Zhu
Derui Zhu
QLQifu Long
Qifu Long
YXYuzhen Xu
Yuzhen Xu
JXJiangwa Xing
Jiangwa Xing
Nanoparticles (NPs) have found a wide range of applications in clinical therapeutic and diagnostic fields. However, currently most NPs are still in the preclinical evaluation phase with few approved for clinical use. Microfluidic systems can simulate dynamic fluid flows, chemical gradients, partitioning of multi-organs as well as local microenvironment controls, offering an efficient and cost-effective opportunity to fast screen NPs in physiologically relevant conditions. Here, in this review, we are focusing on summarizing key microfluidic platforms promising to mimic in vivo situations and test the performance of fabricated nanoparticles. Firstly, we summarize the key evaluation parameters of NPs which can affect their delivery efficacy, followed by highlighting the importance of microfluidic-based NP evaluation. Next, we will summarize main microfluidic systems effective in evaluating NP haemocompatibility, transport, uptake and toxicity, targeted accumulation and general efficacy respectively, and discuss the future directions for NP evaluation in microfluidic systems. The combination of nanoparticles and microfluidic technologies could greatly facilitate the development of drug delivery strategies and provide novel treatments and diagnostic techniques for clinically challenging diseases.

17 August 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JXJiangwa Xing
Jiangwa Xing
YCYue Cao
Yue Cao
YYYang Yu
Yang Yu
HLHuan Li
Huan Li
ZSZiwei Song
Ziwei Song
HYHanry Yu
Hanry Yu
Exposure to teratogenic chemicals during pregnancy may cause severe birth defects. Due to high inter-species variation of drug responses as well as financial and ethical burdens, despite the widely use of in vivo animal tests, it’s crucial to develop highly predictive human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based in vitro assays to identify potential teratogens. Previously we have shown that the morphological disruption of mesoendoderm patterns formed by geometrically-confined cell differentiation and migration using hPSCs could potentially serve as a sensitive morphological marker in teratogen detection. Here, a micropatterned human pluripotent stem cell test (µP-hPST) assay was developed using 30 pharmaceutical compounds. A simplified morphometric readout was developed to quantify the mesoendoderm pattern changes and a two-step classification rule was generated to identify teratogens. The optimized µP-hPST could classify the 30 compounds with 97% accuracy, 100% specificity and 93% sensitivity. Compared with metabolic biomarker-based hPSC assay by Stemina, the µP-hPST could successfully identify misclassified drugs Bosentan, Diphenylhydantoin and Lovastatin, and show a higher accuracy and sensitivity. This scalable µP-hPST may serve as either an independent assay or a complement assay for existing assays to reduce animal use, accelerate early discovery-phase drug screening and help general chemical screening of human teratogens.