Rachele Pojednic

Dr. Rachele Pojednic

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic
EDEmma D'Arpino
Emma D'Arpino
IHIan Halliday
Ian Halliday
ABAmy Bantham
Amy Bantham
Purposeful weight loss continues to be the primary focus for treating obesity. However, this strategy appears to be inadequate as obesity rates continue to rise and a myriad of benefits of physical activity that affect multiple health outcomes related to obesity and associated comorbidities are not integrated into treatment strategies. There are emerging correlational data in individuals with obesity that demonstrate physical activity can be beneficial to many critical health markers, independent of weight loss or changes in BMI. This systematic review investigates interventional studies that examine health markers, independent of weight loss, in individuals with obesity. Fourteen studies were identified that utilized a variety of physical activity interventions with primary endpoints that included cellular, metabolic, systemic and brain health outcomes. The review of the literature demonstrates that for individuals with obesity, there are both small-scale and large-scale physiologic benefits that occur with increased physical activity of various modalities. Focusing on these benefits, rather than a narrow focus of weight loss alone, may increase physical activity behavior and health for individuals with obesity.

1 August 2012 in Experimental Gerontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic
DCDavid J. Clark
David J. Clark
CPCarolynn Patten
Carolynn Patten
KRKieran Reid
Kieran Reid
EPEdward M. Phillips
Edward M. Phillips
RFRoger Fielding
Roger Fielding

7 January 2025 in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECElizabeth Chun
Elizabeth Chun
DRDavid Rivera
David Rivera
KRKirsten Reyna
Kirsten Reyna
HLHenry Legere
Henry Legere
RJRichard Joseph
Richard Joseph
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic

1 November 2014 in Global Advances in Health and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RPRani Polak
Rani Polak
DDDiana Dill
Diana Dill
MAMartin J. Abrahamson
Martin J. Abrahamson
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic
EPEdward Michael Phillips
Edward Michael Phillips
Nutrition therapy as part of lifestyle care is recommended for people with type 2 diabetes. However, most people with diabetes do not follow this guideline. Changing eating habits involves obtaining knowledge and building practical skills such as shopping, meal preparation, and food storage. Just as fitness coaches use their specific knowledge base in fitness to enhance the effectiveness of their coaching, credentialed chefs trained as health coaches might combine their culinary expertise with coaching in order to improve clients’ food choices and lifestyles. This report documents the case of a 55-year-old white male physician, single and living alone, who was recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and reported chronic stress, sedentary behavior, and unhealthy eating habits. He participated in a chef coaching program of 8 weekly one-on-one 30-minute coaching sessions via Skype delivered by a chef trained as a health coach. During the first five meetings, the patient's goals were primarily culinary; however, with his success in accomplishing these goals, the patient progressed and expanded his goals to include other lifestyle domains, specifically exercise and work-life balance. At the end of the program, the patient had improved both his nutritional and exercise habits, his confidence in further self-care improvement, and his health parameters such as HgA1c (8.8% to 6.7%; normal <6.5%). We conclude that chef coaching has the potential to help people with diabetes improve their practical culinary skills and implement them so that they eat better and, further, has the potential to help them improve their overall self-care. We intend to further develop chef coaching and assess its potential as we learn from its implementation.

23 May 2022 in American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic
EPEdward Phillips
Edward Phillips
ASAmal Shehadeh
Amal Shehadeh
AMAlexandria Muller
Alexandria Muller
EMElizabeth Metallinos-Katsaras
Elizabeth Metallinos-Katsaras
Purpose. This study aims to examine the frequency and content of healthcare providers’ nutrition recommendations and referrals Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDN). Methods. Physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and other providers (> 18 years of age) currently practicing primarily in the United States received an email survey that assessed dietary recommendations for diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, overweight/obesity, and general wellbeing, frequency and comfort level of providing nutrition advice, and RDN referrals. Chi-square and Student’s t-tests were used for analysis. Results. 154 physicians (61%), registered nurses/nurse practitioners/physician assistants (19.5%), and other providers (19.5%) were included. Those with nutrition education gave nutrition advice more than those without for some, but not all, conditions ( P = .01). The Mediterranean diet was most frequently recommended, except for hypertension. The DASH diet was recommended to 47.7% of patients with hypertension. More providers gave dietary advice than referred to RDNs. Dietary advice was associated with RDN referrals for diabetes ( P = .01) and wellbeing ( P = .05). Providers with an RDN in their practice provided advice for diabetes more than those without ( P = .01). Conclusion. Healthcare providers gave nutrition recommendations consistent with evidence-based guidance. RDN referrals occur in conjunction with dietary recommendations, not as replacement.

16 October 2018 in BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRachele Pojednic
Rachele Pojednic
ABAmy Bantham
Amy Bantham
FAFred Arnstein
Fred Arnstein
MKMary Kennedy
Mary Kennedy
EPEdward Michael Phillips
Edward Michael Phillips
Objective Health clubs (HC) and personal trainers (PT) are traditional outlets for the promotion of physical activity (PA) and exercise programming. As physicians are increasingly being called on to write exercise prescriptions for their patients, this study sought to investigate the level of integration between the healthcare and fitness systems. Design An internet study was designed with five domains to understand physicians’: (1) overall perception of HC, (2) appropriateness and recommendation of HC and PT to their patients, (3) attitude regarding specific aspects of HC, (4) support of patient participation in HC sponsored exercise and (5) elements of HC that physicians would like to know for referral. Methods An electronic survey was sent to members of two mailing lists of primary care and sports medicine specialty physicians during 2011–2012. Results On a Likert scale of 1–10 412 physicians reported being familiar with HC (8.9±2.1), indicated a favourable view of HC (7.9±2.2), and believe HC to be an appropriate venue for their patients (7.5±2.3). However, physicians only recommend HC to 41%±28% of their patients and PT for only 21%±21.6% of patients. Physicians ranked expense and convenience as the most problematic elements of HC (8.1±2.1 and 6.3±2.5, respectively). 72% of physicians indicated cost as most concerning when recommending a specific HC. Conclusion HC and PT are a significant implementation system for the promotion of physical activity, yet physicians are concerned with several elements of HC and are not adequately relying on this partnership to promote physical activity to their patients.