Cornelia C Metges

Cornelia C Metges

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2006 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGunnar Loh
Gunnar Loh
MEMarkus Eberhard
Markus Eberhard
RBRonald M. Brunner
Ronald M. Brunner
UHUlf Hennig
Ulf Hennig
SKSiegfried Kuhla
Siegfried Kuhla
CMCornelia C Metges
Cornelia C Metges
Inulin stimulates intestinal bifidobacteria in humans and rodents but its effect in pigs is inconsistent. We assessed the effect of inulin on the intestinal microbiota by fluorescent in situ hybridization in growing pigs (age 9–12 wk). Pigs (n = 64) were assigned to 2 types of basal diets [wheat and barley (WB) or corn and wheat gluten (CG)] with or without 3% inulin (WBI or CGI) for 3 and 6 wk (n = 8/group) to test whether naturally occurring dietary fibers influence the inulin effect. Intestinal organic acids, pH values, and residual inulin were determined. The composition of the microbiota was highly individual. The duration of feeding did not affect any of the variables tested; therefore, data for the 2 periods were pooled. Bifidobacteria were detected in less than half of the pigs. Inulin did not stimulate lactobacilli and bifidobacteria numbers irrespective of the basal diet, although 20–50% of inulin was degraded in the jejunum. The number of pigs with colonic bifidobacteria was higher in those fed diets containing inulin (40 vs. 13%; P < 0.05). Total colonic short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were lower in both inulin-fed groups due to reduced acetate (P < 0.05). Proportions of colonic butyrate were higher in pigs fed inulin-supplemented diets (P < 0.05). Colonic pH tended to be lower in the WB groups (WB; 6.6 ± 0.6), and was higher due to inulin (CGI, 7.1 ± 0.1; P < 0.05). In conclusion, inulin affected intestinal SCFA and the number of pigs harboring bifidobacteria; this effect was independent of the basal diet.

5 May 2022 in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMohammad M. Seyedalmoosavi
Mohammad M. Seyedalmoosavi
MMManfred Mielenz
Manfred Mielenz
TVTeun Veldkamp
Teun Veldkamp
GDGürbüz Daş
Gürbüz Daş
CMCornelia C Metges
Cornelia C Metges
In recent years, interest in the larvae of black soldier fly (BSF) (Hermetia illucens) as a sustainable protein resource for livestock feed has increased considerably. However, knowledge on the nutritional and physiological aspects of this insect, especially compared to other conventional farmed animals is scarce. This review presents a critical comparison of data on the growth potential and efficiency of the BSF larvae (BSFL) compared to conventional monogastric livestock species. Advantages of BSFL over other monogastric livestock species includes their high growth rate and their ability to convert low-grade organic waste into high-quality protein and fat-rich biomass suitable for use in animal feed. Calculations using literature data suggest that BSFL are more efficient than broilers, pigs and fish in terms of conversion of substrate protein into body mass, but less efficient than broilers and fish in utilization of substrate gross energy to gain body mass. BSFL growth efficiency varies greatly depending on the nutrient quality of their dietary substrates. This might be associated with the function of their gastrointestinal tract, including the activity of digestive enzymes, the substrate particle characteristics, and their intestinal microbial community. The conceived advantage of BSFL having an environmental footprint better than conventional livestock is only true if BSFL is produced on low-grade organic waste and its protein would directly be used for human consumption. Therefore, their potential role as a new species to better close nutrient cycles in agro-ecological systems needs to be reconsidered, and we conclude that BSFL is a complementary livestock species efficiently utilizing organic waste that cannot be utilized by other livestock. In addition, we provide comparative insight into morpho-functional aspects of the gut, characterization of digestive enzymes, gut microbiota and fiber digestion. Finally, current knowledge on the nutritional utilization and requirements of BSFL in terms of macro- and micro-nutrients is reviewed and found to be rather limited. In addition, the research methods to determine nutritional requirements of conventional livestock are not applicable for BSFL. Thus, there is a great need for research on the nutrient requirements of BSFL.

1 February 2002 in The Journal of Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMaren Daenzer
Maren Daenzer
SOSylvia Ortmann
Sylvia Ortmann
Susanne KlausSusanne Klaus
Susanne Klaus
CMCornelia C Metges
Cornelia C Metges
Epidemiologic results suggest that protein intake in infancy and later adiposity might be related. We examined whether high dietary protein exposure in utero and/or during postnatal life affects body fatness. Two groups of female rats were mated and pair-fed isocaloric high (40% protein; HP) or adequate protein (20% protein; AP) diets throughout pregnancy. The male offspring were suckled (3 wk) by foster mothers pair-fed HP or AP diets, resulting in 4 pre-/postnatal groups (AP-AP, AP-HP, HP-AP, HP-HP). Subsequently, they were pair-fed the same diets their nurses received during lactation until wk 9. Offspring of HP dams had a lower body weight on d 2 of life than their AP counterparts (7.6 ± 0.7 vs. 8.3 ± 0.8 g; P < 0.001). HP-AP rats had a higher body weight than AP-AP controls at wk 3, 5, and 6 (P < 0.05), in contrast to HP-HP which did not differ from controls. Prenatal HP exposure resulted in a greater total and relative fat mass and decreased total energy expenditure at wk 9 (P < 0.05). Postnatal HP alone had no significant effect on body composition or metabolic rate. These results indicate that in utero exposure to a high protein level reprograms body weight and energy homeostasis.

1 February 2009 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGS. Görs
S. Görs
MKM. Kucia
M. Kucia
MLM. Langhammer
M. Langhammer
PJP. Junghans
P. Junghans
CMCornelia C Metges
Cornelia C Metges
Analysis in individual mouse milk samples is restricted by small sample volumes and hindered by high fat contents. Miniaturized methods were developed for the analysis of dry matter (DM), crude fat, crude protein (CP), and lactose in individual samples of

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFatuma Meyer
Fatuma Meyer
KBKaren Bannert
Karen Bannert
Mats L. WieseMats L. Wiese
Mats L. Wiese
SESusanne Esau
Susanne Esau
LSLea F. Sautter
Lea F. Sautter
LVLuzia Valentini
Luzia Valentini
Liver cirrhosis is frequently accompanied by disease-related malnutrition (DRM) and sarcopenia, defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. DRM and sarcopenia often coexist in cirrhotic patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The clinical manifestation of both comorbidities are triggered by multifactorial mechanisms including reduced nutrient and energy intake caused by dietary restrictions, anorexia, neuroendocrine deregulation, olfactory and gustatory deficits. Maldigestion and malabsorption due to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, pancreatic insufficiency or cholestasis may also contribute to DRM and sarcopenia. Decreased protein synthesis and increased protein degradation is the cornerstone mechanism to muscle loss, among others mediated by disease- and inflammation-mediated metabolic changes, hyperammonemia, increased myostatin and reduced human growth hormone. The concise pathophysiological mechanisms and interactions of DRM and sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis are not completely understood. Furthermore, most knowledge in this field are based on experimental models, but only few data in humans exist. This review summarizes known and proposed molecular mechanisms contributing to malnutrition and sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis and highlights remaining knowledge gaps. Since, in the prevention and treatment of DRM and sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients, more research is needed to identify potential biomarkers for diagnosis and development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

1 September 2016 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QSQ. Sciascia
Q. Sciascia
GDGürbüz Daş
Gürbüz Daş
CMCornelia C Metges
Cornelia C Metges
The porcine model has been utilized by researchers to study human developmental aspects, surgical procedures, disease impacts, and nutritional interventions for over 60 yr. However, when it comes to investigating how nutrients regulate human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) function and health, and nutritional research evolves from dietary composition to potential nutraceutical applications, the question needs to be asked: is the pig an appropriate translational animal model? Morphologically and functionally, the porcine GIT has more similarity to the human GIT than commonly used models such as rats. Food intake related to BW is much lower in humans than in pigs, which explains the higher and faster growth and earlier maturation in the latter species. In addition, the digestion and metabolism of carbohydrates, prebiotics, lipids, and amino acids produce similar metabolites and subsequent effects on GIT development and health in pigs and humans, making the pig a more comparable model to study human GIT issues than other nonprimate species. However, there are key divergences. Pigs have a functional cecum, larger colon, and the endogenous microbiota of the GIT, while similar at the phylum level is vastly different at the genera level. One notable microbial species that is low to nonexistent in the porcine GIT are the Bifidobacterium, which is a major probiotic species in humans. Several porcine models have been developed to overcome these issues, but they are new and have yet to be fully tested. This paper will provide a comparative analysis between the human and porcine GIT in regards to structure, function, and health and how various nutritional factors influence these characteristics and future developments of the porcine model. Copyright © 2016. American Society of Animal Science .