Ming-Chieh Shih

Dr. Ming-Chieh Shih

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2020 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYi-Jie Wang
Yi-Jie Wang
TYTzu Lin Yeh
Tzu Lin Yeh
MSMing-Chieh Shih
Ming-Chieh Shih
Yu-Kang TuYu-Kang Tu
Yu-Kang Tu
KCKuo-Liong Chien
Kuo-Liong Chien
Dietary sodium intake has received considerable attention as a potential risk factor of cardiovascular disease. However, evidence on the dose-response association between dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risk is unclear. Embase and PubMed were searched from their inception to 17 August 2020 and studies that examined the association between sodium intake and cardiovascular disease in adolescents were not included in this review. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the effect of high sodium intake using a random effects model. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment was performed. A random-effects dose-response model was used to estimate the linear and nonlinear dose-response relationships. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted to explain the observed heterogeneity. We identified 36 reports, which included a total of 616,905 participants, and 20 of these reports were also used for a dose-response meta-analysis. Compared with individuals with low sodium intake, individuals with high sodium intake had a higher adjusted risk of cardiovascular disease (Rate ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence intervals = 1.08–1.30). Our findings suggest that there is a significant linear relationship between dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular disease risk. The risk of cardiovascular disease increased up to 6% for every 1 g increase in dietary sodium intake. A low-sodium diet should be encouraged and education regarding reduced sodium intake should be provided.

14 November 2019 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHShi-Wei Huang
Shi-Wei Huang
CTChung-You Tsai
Chung-You Tsai
CTChi-Shin Tseng
Chi-Shin Tseng
MSMing-Chieh Shih
Ming-Chieh Shih
YYYi-Chun Yeh
Yi-Chun Yeh
Yu-Kang TuYu-Kang Tu
Yu-Kang Tu
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to 31 March 2019. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing vapourisation, resection, and enucleation of the prostate using monopolar, bipolar, or various laser systems (holmium, thulium, potassium titanyl phosphate, or diode) as surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary outcomes were the maximal flow rate (Qmax) and international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) at 12 months after surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes were Qmax and IPSS values at 6, 24, and 36 months after surgical treatment; perioperative parameters; and surgical complications. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted the study data and performed quality assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effect sizes were summarised using weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and odds ratios for binary outcomes. Frequentist approach to the network meta-analysis was used to estimate comparative effects and safety. Ranking probabilities of each treatment were also calculated. Results 109 trials with a total of 13 676 participants were identified. Nine surgical treatments were evaluated. Enucleation achieved better Qmax and IPSS values than resection and vapourisation methods at six and 12 months after surgical treatment, and the difference maintained up to 24 and 36 months after surgical treatment. For Qmax at 12 months after surgical treatment, the best three methods compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were bipolar enucleation (mean difference 2.42 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.73)), diode laser enucleation (1.86 (−0.17 to 3.88)), and holmium laser enucleation (1.07 (0.07 to 2.08)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (−1.90 (−5.07 to 1.27)). The results of IPSS at 12 months after treatment were similar to Qmax at 12 months after treatment. The best three methods, versus monopolar TURP, were diode laser enucleation (mean difference −1.00 (−2.41 to 0.40)), bipolar enucleation (0.87 (−1.80 to 0.07)), and holmium laser enucleation (−0.84 (−1.51 to 0.58)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (1.30 (−1.16 to 3.76)). Eight new methods were better at controlling bleeding than monopolar TURP, resulting in a shorter catheterisation duration, reduced postoperative haemoglobin declination, fewer clot retention events, and lower blood transfusion rate. However, short term transient urinary incontinence might still be a concern for enucleation methods, compared with resection methods (odds ratio 1.92, 1.39 to 2.65). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion Eight new endoscopic surgical methods for benign prostatic hyperplasia appeared to be superior in safety compared with monopolar TURP. Among these new treatments, enucleation methods showed better Qmax and IPSS values than vapourisation and resection methods. Study registration CRD42018099583.

5 October 2018 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWing-Keen Yap
Wing-Keen Yap
MSMing-Chieh Shih
Ming-Chieh Shih
CKChin Kuo
Chin Kuo
PPPing-Ching Pai
Ping-Ching Pai
WCWen-Chi Chou
Wen-Chi Chou
NTNgan-Ming Tsang
Ngan-Ming Tsang
Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignant neoplasm and the leading cause of cancer-related death, with an incidence surpassing 1.6 million cases (approximately 13% of cancer diagnosed) and a mortality rate of approximately 1.4 million (reflecting 18% of cancer-related deaths) annually.1 A recent analysis of the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database, which encompasses 569 000 patients from 52 cancer centers in the United States, revealed that lung cancer is only second to prostate cancer in the 10-year cumulative incidences of bone metastasis at a rate of 12.9% (95% CI, 12.6%-13.2%).2 Most patients who develop bone metastases will eventually receive radiotherapy for various reasons such as palliation for severe bone pain, spinal cord compression, prevention of pathological fracture or neurological deficit, or even long-term tumor control.3,4 Thus, patients receiving radiotherapy for bone metastases arising from lung cancer compose a large proportion of palliative service recipients in radiation oncology departments.

1 May 2019
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYShu-Wei Yeh
Shu-Wei Yeh
CHChien-Hsiung Hong
Chien-Hsiung Hong
MSMing-Chieh Shih
Ming-Chieh Shih
KTKa-Wai Tam
Ka-Wai Tam
YHYao-Hsien Huang
Yao-Hsien Huang
YKYi-Chun Kuan
Yi-Chun Kuan

25 March 2021 in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHuei-Kai Huang
Huei-Kai Huang
KBKhulood Bukhari
Khulood Bukhari
CPCarol Chiung‐Hui Peng
Carol Chiung‐Hui Peng
DHDuan‐Pei Hung
Duan‐Pei Hung
MSMing-Chieh Shih
Ming-Chieh Shih
Yu-Kang TuYu-Kang Tu
Yu-Kang Tu