Peng Wang

Dr. Peng Wang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 September 2022 in Composites Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
LKLin-Yu-Wen Ke
Lin-Yu-Wen Ke
HWHao-Liang Wu
Hao-Liang Wu
CLChristopher K.Y. Leung
Christopher K.Y. Leung

26 October 2020 in Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BWBiao Wei
Biao Wei
WWWei-Hao Wang
Wei-Hao Wang
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
TYTian-Han Yang
Tian-Han Yang
LJLi-Zhong Jiang
Li-Zhong Jiang
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
The seismic vulnerability of high-speed railway (HSR) bridges may be overestimated or underestimated when the track structure is oversimplified in a finite element model. Thus, the author established a track-bridge model considering CRTS II slab ballastless track and a trackless-bridge model. The effect of track constraint on the seismic vulnerability of various bridge components and overall system was evaluated by comparing the seismic vulnerability curves of different models under longitudinal earthquakes. The track structure itself was also evaluated, and the multiple components of the track structure were found to be under threat of seismic damage and needed seismic risk assessment.

7 July 2023 in Cement and Concrete Composites
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
HWHao-Liang Wu
Hao-Liang Wu
LKLin-Yu-Wen Ke
Lin-Yu-Wen Ke
Weiwen LiWeiwen Li
Weiwen Li
CLChristopher K.Y. Leung
Christopher K.Y. Leung

27 May 2024 in Construction and Building Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMohamed Ghalla
Mohamed Ghalla
WMWalid Mansour
Walid Mansour
Weiwen LiWeiwen Li
Weiwen Li
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
MBMoataz Badawi
Moataz Badawi
MZMohamed A. El Zareef
Mohamed A. El Zareef

17 June 2024 in Composite Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJiaying Wei
Jiaying Wei
LKLinyuwen Ke
Linyuwen Ke
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
Weiwen LiWeiwen Li
Weiwen Li
CLChristopher K.Y. Leung
Christopher K.Y. Leung

8 January 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Walid MansourWalid Mansour
Walid Mansour
Weiwen LiWeiwen Li
Weiwen Li
Peng WangPeng Wang
Peng Wang
CFCheikh Makhfouss FAME
Cheikh Makhfouss FAME
Lik-ho TamLik-ho Tam
Lik-ho Tam
NENoha Yehia Elwakkad
Noha Yehia Elwakkad
This paper presents a numerical investigation of the flexural behavior of timber beams externally strengthened with carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets. At first, the accuracy of linear elastic and elastic-plastic models in predicting the behavior of bare timber beams was compared. Then, two modeling approaches (i.e., the perfect bond method and progressive damage technique using the cohesive zone model (CZM)) were considered to simulate the interfacial behavior between FRP and timber. The models were validated against published experimental data, and the most accurate numerical procedure was identified and subsequently used for a parametric study. The length of FRP sheets varied from 50% to 100% of the total length of the beam, while different FRP layers were considered. Moreover, the effects of two strengthening configurations (i.e., FRP attached in the tensile zone only and in both the tensile and compressive zones) on load-deflection response, flexural strength, and flexural rigidity were considered. The results showed that elastic-plastic models are more accurate than linear elastic models in predicting the flexural strength and failure patterns of bare timber beams. In addition, with increasing FRP length, the increase in flexural strength ranged from 10.3% to 52.9%, while no further increase in flexural strength could be achieved beyond an effective length of 80% of the total length of the beam. Attaching the FRP to both the tensile and compressive zone was more effective in enhancing the flexural properties of the timber beam than attaching the FRP to the tensile zone only.