Fiona Young

Fiona Young


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DFDaniela Figueroa
Daniela Figueroa
MAMohammad Asaduzzaman
Mohammad Asaduzzaman
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
The detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) using 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) is commonly performed by a single measurement of fluorescence but this fails to capture a profile of ROS generation over time. This study aimed to develop a real-time monitoring method to increase the utility of the assay, to incorporate cytotoxicity screening and to describe the combined effects of DCFDA and the ROS generator, Ter-butyl hydrogen peroxide (TBHP). Breast cancer MCF-7 cells were loaded with DCFDA (0-50 μM) for 45 min, and then exposed to TBHP (0-50 μM). Fluorescence was recorded according to three different schedules: every hour for 6 h, or once after 6 h or 24 h. Viability was assessed in a crystal violet assay and cell morphology was examined by microscopy. TBHP caused a time and dose-dependent increase in ROS and the magnitude of the fluorescent signal was affected by the loading concentration of DCFDA. Reading the fluorescence every hour for 6 h did not diminish the emission signal. The most sensitive and reliable combination for this ROS assay was 10 μM DCFDA with 25 μM TBHP; since higher concentrations of DCFDA compromised cell viability. In conclusion we adapted a single point ROS assay to enable production of a profile of ROS generation over an extended 6 h period, and related this to cell viability and morphology.

1 April 2008 in Reproductive Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
JMJ Micklem
J Micklem
AHA Humpage
A Humpage

10 January 2012 in Marine Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VEVicki Edwards
Vicki Edwards
KBKirsten Benkendorff
Kirsten Benkendorff
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
Anticancer properties of tyrindoleninone and 6-bromoisatin from Dicathais orbita were tested against physiologically normal primary human granulosa cells (HGC) and reproductive cancer cell lines. Tyrindoleninone reduced cancer cell viability with IC50 values of 39 µM (KGN; a tumour-derived granulosa cell line), 39 μM (JAr), and 156 μM (OVCAR-3), compared to 3516 μM in HGC. Apoptosis in HGC’s occurred after 4 h at 391 µM tyrindoleninone compared to 20 µM in KGN cells. Differences in apoptosis between HGC and KGN cells were confirmed by TUNEL, with 66 and 31% apoptotic nuclei at 4 h in KGN and HGC, respectively. These marine compounds therefore have potential for development as treatments for female reproductive cancers.

5 August 2005 in Human Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
MMMargaret F. Menadue
Margaret F. Menadue
TLTina C. Lavranos
Tina C. Lavranos
BACKGROUND: Amitraz, an insecticide used to prevent tick and mite infestation of cattle, crops and dogs, is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist that inhibits GnRH release and the ovulatory LH surge in rats. Noradrenalin, the physiological ligand for adrenergic receptors, inhibits progesterone production by IVF-derived granulosa cells, but the effects of amitraz are unknown. METHODS: Luteinized granulosa cells obtained from women undergoing ovarian stimulation were exposed to amitraz (1, 10, 50, 100 µg/ml) for 2–72 h, and to amitraz (50 µg/ml) hCG or the specific α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine, for 6 h. Cell numbers were determined by 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide(MTT) assay and hormone production by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Amitraz 10 µg/ml did not affect cell numbers or estrogen production, but reduced progesterone production to 58 8% (p < 0.01, 24 h, n = 6) of control values. Amitraz (100 µg/ml) was cytotoxic and caused a corresponding reduction in hormone production. Amitraz 50 µg/ml did not affect cell numbers or estrogen production, but reduced progesterone per cell production to 82 6% of control values after 6 h. This was prevented by 0.2 mmol/l yohimbine. Exposure to amitraz 50 µg/ml for 6 h exposure abolished hCG-stimulated progesterone production but not estrogen production. CONCLUSIONS: Amitraz inhibited basal and hCG-stimulated progesterone but not estrogen production. The inhibitory action of amitraz and its antagonism by yohimbine suggest that α2- adrenergic receptors are expressed by luteinized human granulosa cells.

7 January 2020 in Antioxidants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDaniela Figueroa Gonzalez
Daniela Figueroa Gonzalez
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide are used to treat breast cancer, but they also cause infertility through off-target cytotoxicity towards proliferating granulosa cells that surround eggs. Each chemotherapeutic generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) but the effects of the combination, or the antioxidants alpha (αToc) and gamma tocopherol (γToc) on ROS in breast cancer or ovarian cells are unknown. Human breast cancer (MCF7, T47D) and ovarian cancer (OVCAR, COV434) cells were loaded with DCDFA and exposed (1, 2, 3, 24 h) to the MCF7-derived EC25 values of individual agents, or to combinations of these. ROS were quantified and viable cells enumerated using crystal violet or DAPI. Each chemotherapeutic killed ~25% of MCF7, T47D and OVCAR cells, but 57 ± 2% (doxorubicin) and 66 ± 2% (cyclophosphamide) of the COV434 granulosa cells. The combined chemotherapeutics decreased COV434 cell viability to 34 ± 5% of control whereas doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + γToc reduced ROS within 3 h (p < 0.01) and reduced cytotoxicity to 54 ± 4% (p < 0.05). αToc was not cytotoxic, whereas γToc killed ~25% of the breast cancer but none of the ovarian cells. Adding γToc to the combined chemotherapeutics did not change ROS or cytotoxicity in MCF7, T47D or OVCAR cells. The protection γToc afforded COV434 granulosa cells against chemotherapy-induced ROS and cytotoxicity suggests potential for fertility preservation.

1 August 2012 in Toxicology in Vitro
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FYFiona Young
Fiona Young
DZDina Zebian
Dina Zebian
SFSuzanne Froscio
Suzanne Froscio
AHAndrew Humpage
Andrew Humpage