Philip Atherton

Prof. Dr. Philip Atherton

School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2012 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WMW. Kyle Mitchell
W. Kyle Mitchell
JWJohn Williams
John Williams
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
MLMike Larvin
Mike Larvin
JLJonathan Lund
Jonathan Lund
Marco NariciMarco Narici
Marco Narici
Changing demographics make it ever more important to understand the modifiable risk factors for disability and loss of independence with advancing age. For more than two decades there has been increasing interest in the role of sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle or lean mass, in curtailing active and healthy aging. There is now evidence to suggest that lack of strength, or dynapenia, is a more constant factor in compromised wellbeing in old age and it is apparent that the decline in muscle mass and the decline in strength can take quite different trajectories. This demands recognition of the concept of muscle quality; that is the force generating per capacity per unit cross-sectional area (CSA). An understanding of the impact of aging on skeletal muscle will require attention to both the changes in muscle size and the changes in muscle quality. The aim of this review is to present current knowledge of the decline in human muscle mass and strength with advancing age and the associated risk to health and survival and to review the underlying changes in muscle characteristics and the etiology of sarcopenia. Cross-sectional studies comparing young (18–45 years) and old (>65 years) samples show dramatic variation based on the technique used and population studied. The median of values of rate of loss reported across studies is 0.47% per year in men and 0.37% per year in women. Longitudinal studies show that in people aged 75 years, muscle mass is lost at a rate of 0.64–0.70% per year in women and 0.80–00.98% per year in men. Strength is lost more rapidly. Longitudinal studies show that at age 75 years, strength is lost at a rate of 3–4% per year in men and 2.5–3% per year in women. Studies that assessed changes in mass and strength in the same sample report a loss of strength 2–5 times faster than loss of mass. Loss of strength is a more consistent risk for disability and death than is loss of muscle mass.

1 November 2018 in Ageing Research Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DWD.J. Wilkinson
D.J. Wilkinson
MPM. Piasecki
M. Piasecki
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
Age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, sarcopenia, is associated with physical frailty and increased risk of morbidity (chronic diseases), in addition to all-cause mortality. The loss of muscle mass occurs incipiently from middle-age (∼1%/year), and in severe instances can lead to a loss of ∼50% by the 8-9th decade of life. This review will focus on muscle deterioration with ageing and highlight the two underpinning mechanisms regulating declines in muscle mass and function: muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss (hypoplasia) - and their measurement. The mechanisms of muscle fibre atrophy in humans relate to imbalances in muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and breakdown (MPB); however, since there is limited evidence for basal alterations in muscle protein turnover, it would appear that "anabolic resistance" to fundamental environmental cues regulating diurnal muscle homeostasis (namely physical activity and nutrition), underlie age-related catabolic perturbations in muscle proteostasis. While the 'upstream' drivers of the desensitization of aged muscle to anabolic stimuli are poorly defined, they most likely relate to impaired efficiency of the conversion of nutritional/exercise stimuli into signalling impacting mRNA translation and proteolysis. Additionally, loss of muscle fibres has been shown in cadaveric studies using anatomical fibre counts, and from iEMG studies demonstrating motor unit loss, albeit with few molecular investigations of this in humans. We suggest that defining countermeasures against sarcopenia requires improved understandings of the co-ordinated regulation of muscle fibre atrophy and fibre loss, which are likely to be inextricably linked.

2 January 2009 in The Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VKVinod Kumar
Vinod Kumar
ASAnna Selby
Anna Selby
DRDebbie Rankin
Debbie Rankin
RPRekha Patel
Rekha Patel
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
MRMichael J. Rennie
Michael J. Rennie

1 February 2011 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGordon I Smith
Gordon I Smith
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
DRDominic N Reeds
Dominic N Reeds
BMB Selma Mohammed
B Selma Mohammed
DRDebbie Rankin
Debbie Rankin
BMBettina Mittendorfer
Bettina Mittendorfer
Background: Loss of muscle mass with aging is a major public health concern. Omega-3 (n–3) fatty acids stimulate protein anabolism in animals and mig

1 May 2016 in Journal of Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMark E Cleasby
Mark E Cleasby
PJPauline M Jamieson
Pauline M Jamieson
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
Insulin resistance (IR) in skeletal muscle is a key defect mediating the link between obesity and type 2 diabetes, a disease that typically affects people in later life. Sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle mass and quality) is a risk factor for a number of frailty-related conditions that occur in the elderly. In addition, a syndrome of ‘sarcopenic obesity’ (SO) is now increasingly recognised, which is common in older people and is applied to individuals that simultaneously show obesity, IR and sarcopenia. Such individuals are at an increased risk of adverse health events compared with those who are obese or sarcopenic alone. However, there are no licenced treatments for sarcopenia or SO, the syndrome is poorly defined clinically and the mechanisms that might explain a common aetiology are not yet well characterised. In this review, we detail the nature and extent of the clinical syndrome, highlight some of the key physiological processes that are dysregulated and discuss some candidate molecular pathways that could be implicated in both metabolic and anabolic defects in skeletal muscle, with an eye towards future therapeutic options. In particular, the potential roles of Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signalling, AMP-activated protein kinase, myostatin, urocortins and vitamin D are discussed.

31 July 2008 in The Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSarah B. Wilkinson
Sarah B. Wilkinson
Stuart PhillipsStuart Phillips
Stuart Phillips
Philip AthertonPhilip Atherton
Philip Atherton
RPRekha Patel
Rekha Patel
KYKevin E Yarasheski
Kevin E Yarasheski
MRMichael J. Rennie
Michael J. Rennie