Amelia Silva

Dr. Amelia Silva

Department of Biology and Environment (DeBA, ECVA), and Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB)
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 August 2020 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAleksandra Zielińska
Aleksandra Zielińska
FCFilipa Carreiró
Filipa Carreiró
AOAna M. Oliveira
Ana M. Oliveira
ANAndreia Neves
Andreia Neves
BPBárbara Pires
Bárbara Pires
Eliana B. SoutoEliana B. Souto
Eliana B. Souto
Polymeric nanoparticles (NPs) are particles within the size range from 1 to 1000 nm and can be loaded with active compounds entrapped within or surface-adsorbed onto the polymeric core. The term “nanoparticle” stands for both nanocapsules and nanospheres, which are distinguished by the morphological structure. Polymeric NPs have shown great potential for targeted delivery of drugs for the treatment of several diseases. In this review, we discuss the most commonly used methods for the production and characterization of polymeric NPs, the association efficiency of the active compound to the polymeric core, and the in vitro release mechanisms. As the safety of nanoparticles is a high priority, we also discuss the toxicology and ecotoxicology of nanoparticles to humans and to the environment.

9 February 2020 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elena Sánchez LópezElena Sánchez López
Elena Sánchez López
DGDaniela Gomes
Daniela Gomes
GEGerard Esteruelas
Gerard Esteruelas
LBLorena Bonilla
Lorena Bonilla
ALAna Laura Lopez-Machado
Ana Laura Lopez-Machado
Eliana B. SoutoEliana B. Souto
Eliana B. Souto
Metal-based nanoparticles have been extensively investigated for a set of biomedical applications. According to the World Health Organization, in addition to their reduced size and selectivity for bacteria, metal-based nanoparticles have also proved to be effective against pathogens listed as a priority. Metal-based nanoparticles are known to have non-specific bacterial toxicity mechanisms (they do not bind to a specific receptor in the bacterial cell) which not only makes the development of resistance by bacteria difficult, but also broadens the spectrum of antibacterial activity. As a result, a large majority of metal-based nanoparticles efficacy studies performed so far have shown promising results in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this review has been a comprehensive discussion of the state of the art on the use of the most relevant types of metal nanoparticles employed as antimicrobial agents. A special emphasis to silver nanoparticles is given, while others (e.g., gold, zinc oxide, copper, and copper oxide nanoparticles) commonly used in antibiotherapy are also reviewed. The novelty of this review relies on the comparative discussion of the different types of metal nanoparticles, their production methods, physicochemical characterization, and pharmacokinetics together with the toxicological risk encountered with the use of different types of nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents. Their added-value in the development of alternative, more effective antibiotics against multi-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has been highlighted.

1 May 2014 in European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDSlavomira Doktorovova
Slavomira Doktorovova
Eliana B. SoutoEliana B. Souto
Eliana B. Souto
ASAmelia Silva
Amelia Silva

5 April 2022 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Eliana B. SoutoEliana B. Souto
Eliana B. Souto
ACAmanda Cano
Amanda Cano
CMCarlos Martins-Gomes
Carlos Martins-Gomes
TCTiago Emanuel Coutinho
Tiago Emanuel Coutinho
AZAleksandra Zielińska
Aleksandra Zielińska
ASAmelia Silva
Amelia Silva
Microemulsions and nanoemulsions are lipid-based pharmaceutical systems with a high potential to increase the permeation of drugs through the skin. Although being isotropic dispersions of two nonmiscible liquids (oil and water), significant differences are encountered between microemulsions and nanoemulsions. Microemulsions are thermodynamically stable o/w emulsions of mean droplet size approximately 100–400 nm, whereas nanoemulsions are thermodynamically unstable o/w emulsions of mean droplet size approximately 1 to 100 nm. Their inner oil phase allows the solubilization of lipophilic drugs, achieving high encapsulation rates, which are instrumental for drug delivery. In this review, the importance of these systems, the key differences regarding their composition and production processes are discussed. While most of the micro/nanoemulsions on the market are held by the cosmetic industry to enhance the activity of drugs used in skincare products, the development of novel pharmaceutical formulations designed for the topical, dermal and transdermal administration of therapeutic drugs is being considered. The delivery of poorly water-soluble molecules through the skin has shown some advantages over the oral route, since drugs escape from first-pass metabolism; particularly for the treatment of cutaneous diseases, topical delivery should be the preferential route in order to reduce the number of drugs used and potential side-effects, while directing the drugs to the site of action. Thus, nanoemulsions and microemulsions represent versatile options for the delivery of drugs through lipophilic barriers, and many synthetic and natural compounds have been formulated using these delivery systems, aiming to improve stability, delivery and bioactivity. Detailed information is provided concerning the most relevant recent scientific publications reporting the potential of these delivery systems to increase the skin permeability of drugs with anti-inflammatory, sun-protection, anticarcinogenic and/or wound-healing activities. The main marketed skincare products using emulsion-based systems are also presented and discussed.

27 March 2018 in Journal of Nanobiotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Elena Sánchez LópezElena Sánchez López
Elena Sánchez López
MEMiren Ettcheto
Miren Ettcheto
MEMaria Antonia Egea
Maria Antonia Egea
MGMARTA ESPINA GARCÍA
MARTA ESPINA GARCÍA
ACAmanda Cano
Amanda Cano
MGMª Luisa García
Mª Luisa García
Memantine, drug approved for moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease, has not shown to be fully effective. In order to solve this issue, polylactic-co-glycolic (PLGA) nanoparticles could be a suitable solution to increase drug’s action on the target site as well as decrease adverse effects. For these reason, Memantine was loaded in biodegradable PLGA nanoparticles, produced by double emulsion method and surface-coated with polyethylene glycol. MEM–PEG–PLGA nanoparticles (NPs) were aimed to target the blood–brain barrier (BBB) upon oral administration for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. The production parameters were optimized by design of experiments. MEM–PEG–PLGA NPs showed a mean particle size below 200 nm (152.6 ± 0.5 nm), monomodal size distribution (polydispersity index, PI < 0.1) and negative surface charge (− 22.4 mV). Physicochemical characterization of NPs confirmed that the crystalline drug was dispersed inside the PLGA matrix. MEM–PEG–PLGA NPs were found to be non-cytotoxic on brain cell lines (bEnd.3 and astrocytes). Memantine followed a slower release profile from the NPs against the free drug solution, allowing to reduce drug administration frequency in vivo. Nanoparticles were able to cross BBB both in vitro and in vivo. Behavioral tests carried out on transgenic APPswe/PS1dE9 mice demonstrated to enhance the benefit of decreasing memory impairment when using MEM–PEG–PLGA NPs in comparison to the free drug solution. Histological studies confirmed that MEM–PEG–PLGA NPs reduced β-amyloid plaques and the associated inflammation characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease. Memantine NPs were suitable for Alzheimer’s disease and more effective than the free drug.

1 November 2018 in Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IPIrina Pereira
Irina Pereira
Patricia SeverinoPatricia Severino
Patricia Severino
Ana Cláudia Paiva-SantosAna Cláudia Paiva-Santos
Ana Cláudia Paiva-Santos
ASAmelia Silva
Amelia Silva
Eliana B. SoutoEliana B. Souto
Eliana B. Souto