Although circular RNAs (circRNAs) are enriched in the mammalian brain, very little is known about their potential involvement in brain function and psychiatric disease. Here, we show that circHomer1a, a neuronal-enriched circRNA abundantly expressed in the frontal cortex, derived from Homer protein homolog 1 (HOMER1), is significantly reduced in both the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal cultures from patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder (BD). Moreover, alterations in circHomer1a were positively associated with the age of onset of SCZ in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). No correlations between the age of onset of SCZ and linear HOMER1 mRNA were observed, whose expression was mostly unaltered in BD and SCZ postmortem brain. Using in vivo circRNA-specific knockdown of circHomer1a in mouse PFC, we show that it modulates the expression of numerous alternative mRNA transcripts from genes involved in synaptic plasticity and psychiatric disease. Intriguingly, in vivo circHomer1a knockdown in mouse OFC resulted in specific deficits in OFC-mediated cognitive flexibility. Lastly, we demonstrate that the neuronal RNA-binding protein HuD binds to circHomer1a and can influence its synaptic expression in the frontal cortex. Collectively, our data uncover a novel psychiatric disease-associated circRNA that regulates synaptic gene expression and cognitive flexibility.

Identifying biomarkers is essential for early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). Large (LEVs) and small extracellular vesicles (SEVs) are extracellular vesicles (EVs) of different sizes and biological functions transported in blood and they may be valid biomarkers for NDs. The aim of our study was to investigate common and different miRNA signatures in plasma derived LEVs and SEVs of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Fronto-Temporal Dementia (FTD) patients. LEVs and SEVs were isolated from plasma of patients and healthy volunteers (CTR) by filtration and differential centrifugation and RNA was extracted. Small RNAs libraries were carried out by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). MiRNAs discriminate all NDs diseases from CTRs and they can provide a signature for each NDs. Common enriched pathways for SEVs were instead linked to ubiquitin mediated proteolysis and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways and for LEVs to neurotrophin signaling and Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis pathway. LEVs and SEVs are involved in different pathways and this might give a specificity to their role in the spreading of the disease. The study of common and different miRNAs transported by LEVs and SEVs can be of great interest for biomarker discovery and for pathogenesis studies in neurodegeneration.

We already demonstrated that in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (sALS) patients, superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) was present in an aggregated form in the cytoplasmic compartment. Here, we investigated the possible effect of soluble SOD1 decrease and its consequent aggregation. We found an increase in DNA damage in patients PBMCs characterized by a high level of aggregated SOD1, while we found no DNA damage in PBMCs with normal soluble SOD1. We found an activation of ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM)/Chk2 and ATM and Rad3-related (ATR)/Chk1 DNA damage response pathways, which lead to phosphorylation of SOD1. Moreover, data showed that phosphorylation allows SOD1 to shift from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, protecting DNA from oxidative damage. Such pathway was finally confirmed in our cellular model. Our data lead us to suppose that in a sub-group of patients this physiologic pathway is non-functional, leading to an accumulation of DNA damage that causes the death of particularly susceptible cells, like motor neurons. In conclusion, during oxidative stress SOD1 is phosphorylated by Chk2 leading to its translocation in the nuclear compartment, in which SOD1 protects DNA from oxidative damage. This pathway, inefficient in sALS patients, could represent an innovative therapeutic target.

The RNA-binding protein (RBP) HuD is involved in neuronal differentiation, regeneration, synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. RBPs not only bind to mRNAs but also interact with several types of RNAs including circular RNAs (circRNAs), a class of non-coding RNAs generated by pre-mRNA back-splicing. This study explored whether HuD could regulate the expression of neuronal circRNAs. HuD controls target RNA’s fate by binding to Adenylate-Uridylate Rich Elements (AREs). Using bioinformatics analyses, we found HuD-binding ARE-motifs in about 26% of brain-expressed circRNAs. By RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) from the mouse striatum followed by circRNA arrays, we identified over 600 circRNAs bound to HuD. Among these, 226 derived from genes where HuD also bound to their associated mRNAs including circHomer1a, which we previously characterized as a synaptic HuD target circRNA. Binding of HuD to two additional plasticity–associated circRNAs, circCreb1, and circUfp2, was validated by circRNA-specific qRT-PCR. Interestingly, we found that circUpf2 is also enriched in synaptosomes. Pathway analyses confirmed that the majority of HuD-bound circRNAs originate from genes regulating nervous system development and function. Using striatal tissues from HuD overexpressor (HuD-OE) and knock out (KO) mice for circRNA expression analyses we identified 86 HuD-regulated circRNAs. These derived from genes within the same biological pathways as the HuD RIP. Cross-correlation analyses of HuD-regulated and HuD-bound circRNAs identified 69 regulated in either HuD-OE or HuD-KO and 5 in both sets. These include circBrwd1, circFoxp1, and circMap1a, which derive from genes involved in neuronal development and regeneration, and circMagi1 and circLppr4, originating from genes controlling synapse formation and linked to psychiatric disorders. These circRNAs form competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks including microRNAs and mRNAs. Among the HuD target circRNAs, circBrwd1 and circFoxp1 are regulated in an opposite manner to their respective mRNAs. The expressions of other development- and plasticity-associated HuD target circRNAs such as circSatb2, cirHomer1a and circNtrk3 are also altered after the establishment of cocaine conditioned place preference (CPP). Collectively, these data suggest that HuD interactions with circRNAs regulate their expression and transport, and that the ensuing changes in HuD-regulated ceRNA networks could control neuronal differentiation and synaptic plasticity.