Milos Brajovic

Dr. Milos Brajovic


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 December 2020 in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
DMDanilo Mandic
Danilo Mandic
MDMiloš Daković
Miloš Daković
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
BSBruno Scalzo
Bruno Scalzo
ACANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
ANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
Modern data analytics applications on graphs often operate on domains where graph topology is not known a priori, and hence its determination becomes part of the problem definition, rather than serving as prior knowledge which aids the problem solution. Part III of this monograph starts by a comprehensive account of ways to learn the pertinent graph topology, ranging from the simplest case where the physics of the problem already suggest a possible graph structure, through to general cases where the graph structure is to be learned from the data observed on a graph. A particular emphasis is placed on the use of standard “relationship measures” in this context, including the correlation and precision matrices, together with the ways to combine these with the available prior knowledge and structural conditions, such as the smoothness of the graph signals or sparsity of graph connections. Next, for learning sparse graphs (that is, graphs with a small number of edges), the utility of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, known as (LASSO) is addressed, along with its graph specific variant, the graphical LASSO. For completeness, both variants of LASSO are derived in an intuitive way, starting from basic principles. An in-depth elaboration of the graph topology learning paradigm is provided through examples on physically well defined graphs, such as electric circuits, linear heat transfer, social and computer networks, and spring-mass systems. We also review main trends in graph neural networks (GNN) and graph convolutional networks (GCN) from the perspective of graph signal filtering. Particular insight is given to the role of diffusion processes over graphs, to show that GCNs can be understood from the graph diffusion perspective. Given the largely heuristic nature of the existing GCNs, their treatment through graph diffusion processes may also serve as a basis for new designs of GCNs. Tensor representation of lattice-structured graphs is next considered, and it is shown that tensors (multidimensional data arrays) can be treated as a special class of graph signals, whereby the graph vertices reside on a high-dimensional regular lattice structure. Finally, the concept of graph tensor networks is shown to provide a unifying framework for learning of big data on irregular domains. This part of monograph concludes with an in-dept account of emerging applications in financial data processing and underground transportation network modeling. More specifically, by means of portfolio cuts of an asset graph, we show how domain knowledge can be meaningfully incorporated into investment analysis, while the underground transportation example addresses vulnerability of stations in the London underground network to traffic disruption.

1 January 2020 in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
DMDanilo Mandic
Danilo Mandic
MDMiloš Daković
Miloš Daković
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
BSBruno Scalzo
Bruno Scalzo
ACANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
ANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
Publishers of Foundations and Trends, making research accessible

22 December 2020 in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
DMDanilo Mandic
Danilo Mandic
MDMiloš Daković
Miloš Daković
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
BSBruno Scalzo
Bruno Scalzo
ACANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
ANTONIOS GEORGHIOU CONSTANTINIDES
The area of Data Analytics on graphs deals with information processing of data acquired on irregular but structured graph domains. The focus of Part I of this monograph has been on both the fundamental and higher-order graph properties, graph topologies, and spectral representations of graphs. Part I also establishes rigorous frameworks for vertex clustering and graph segmentation, and illustrates the power of graphs in various data association tasks. Part II embarks on these concepts to address the algorithmic and practical issues related to data/signal processing on graphs, with the focus on the analysis and estimation of both deterministic and random data on graphs. The fundamental ideas related to graph signals are introduced through a simple and intuitive, yet general enough case study of multisensor temperature field estimation. The concept of systems on graph is defined using graph signal shift operators, which generalize the corresponding principles from traditional learning systems. At the core of the spectral domain representation of graph signals and systems is the Graph Fourier Transform (GFT), defined based on the eigendecomposition of both the adjacency matrix and the graph Laplacian. Spectral domain representations are then used as the basis to introduce graph signal filtering concepts and address their design, including Chebyshev series polynomial approximation. Ideas related to the sampling of graph signals, and in particular the challenging topic of data dimensionality reduction through graph subsampling, are presented and further linked with compres-sive sensing. The principles of time-varying signals on graphs and basic definitions related to random graph signals are next reviewed. Localized graph signal analysis in the joint vertex-spectral domain is referred to as the vertex-frequency analysis, since it can be considered as an extension of classical time-frequency analysis to the graph serving as signal domain. Important aspects of the local graph Fourier transform (LGFT) are covered, together with its various forms including the graph spectral and vertex domain windows and the inversion conditions and relations. A link between the LGFT with a varying spectral window and the spectral graph wavelet transform (SGWT) is also established. Realizations of the LGFT and SGWT using polynomial (Chebyshev) approximations of the spectral functions are further considered and supported by examples. Finally, energy versions of the vertex-frequency representations are introduced, along with their relations with classical time-frequency analysis, including a vertex-frequency distribution that can satisfy the marginal properties. The material is supported by illustrative examples.

28 March 2018 in IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
Sparse signals can be reconstructed from a reduced set of signal samples using compressive sensing (CS) methods. The discrete cosine transform (DCT) can provide highly concentrated representations of audio signals. This property implies the DCT as a good sparsity domain for the audio signals. In this paper, the DCT is studied within the context of sparse audio signal processing using the CS theory and methods. The DCT coefficients of a sparse signal, calculated with a reduced set of available samples, can be modeled as random variables. It has been shown that the statistical properties of these variables are closely related to the unique reconstruction conditions. The main result of this paper is in an exact formula for the mean-square reconstruction error in the case of approximately sparse and nonsparse noisy signals reconstructed under the sparsity assumption. Based on the presented analysis, a simple and computationally efficient reconstruction algorithm is proposed. The presented theoretical concepts and the efficiency of the reconstruction algorithm are verified numerically, including examples with synthetic and recorded audio signals with unavailable or corrupted samples. Random disturbances and disturbances simulating clicks or inpainting in audio signals are considered. Statistical verification is done on a dataset with experimental signals. Results are compared with some classical and recent methods used in similar signal and disturbance scenarios.

1 February 2020 in Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
MDMiloš Daković
Miloš Daković
DMDanilo Mandic
Danilo Mandic

25 March 2021 in Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLjubisa Stankovic
Ljubisa Stankovic
MBMilos Brajovic
Milos Brajovic
ISIsidora Stanković
Isidora Stanković
JLJonatan Lerga
Jonatan Lerga
MDMiloš Daković
Miloš Daković