Bernd Stegmayr

Prof. Bernd Stegmayr


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

53Years (1974-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2003 in Kidney International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RVRaymond Vanholder
Raymond Vanholder
F(For the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox)
For the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox)
RSRita De Smet
Rita De Smet
GGGriet Glorieux
Griet Glorieux
AAAngel Argilés
Angel Argilés
WZWalter Zidek
Walter Zidek

1 October 2001 in The International Journal of Artificial Organs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RVR. Vanholder
R. Vanholder
AAA. Argilés
A. Argilés
UBU. Baurmeister
U. Baurmeister
PBP. Brunet
P. Brunet
WCW. Clark
W. Clark
MWM.L Wratten
M.L Wratten
The uremic syndrome is a complex mixture of organ dysfunctions, which is attributed to the retention of a myriad of compounds that under normal condition are excreted by the healthy kidneys (uremic toxins). In the area of identification and characterization of uremic toxins and in the knowledge of their pathophysiologic importance, major steps forward have been made during recent years. The present article is a review of several of these steps, especially in the area of information about the compounds that could play a role in the development of cardiovascular complications. It is written by those members of the Uremic Toxins Group, which has been created by the European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO). Each of the 16 authors has written a state of the art in his/her major area of interest.

1 November 1982 in Urological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBernd Stegmayr
Bernd Stegmayr
GRG. Ronquist
G. Ronquist

1 February 2016 in Transfusion and Apheresis Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHM. Mörtzell Henriksson
M. Mörtzell Henriksson
ENE. Newman
E. Newman
VWV. Witt
V. Witt
KDK. Derfler
K. Derfler
GLG. Leitner
G. Leitner
AWA. Wahlström
A. Wahlström
Apheresis with different procedures and devices are used for a variety of indications that may have different adverse events (AEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the extent and possible reasons of various side effects based on data from a multinational registry. The WAA-apheresis registry data focus on adverse events in a total of 50846 procedures in 7142 patients (42% women). AEs were graded as mild, moderate (need for medication), severe (interruption due to the AE) or death (due to AE). More AEs occurred during the first procedures versus subsequent (8.4 and 5.5%, respectively). AEs were mild in 2.4% (due to access 54%, device 7%, hypotension 15%, tingling 8%), moderate in 3% (tingling 58%, urticaria 15%, hypotension 10%, nausea 3%), and severe in 0.4% of procedures (syncope/hypotension 32%, urticaria 17%, chills/fever 8%, arrhythmia/asystole 4.5%, nausea/vomiting 4%). Hypotension was most common if albumin was used as the replacement fluid, and urticaria when plasma was used. Arrhythmia occurred to similar extents when using plasma or albumin as replacement. In 64% of procedures with bronchospasm, plasma was part of the replacement fluid used. Severe AEs are rare. Although most reactions are mild and moderate, several side effects may be critical for the patient. We present side effects in relation to the procedures and suggest that safety is increased by regular vital sign measurements, cardiac monitoring and by having emergency equipment nearby.

1 June 2003 in Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBernd Stegmayr
Bernd Stegmayr
RBRavjet Banga
Ravjet Banga
LBLars Berggren
Lars Berggren
RNRut Norda
Rut Norda
ARAnders Rydvall
Anders Rydvall
TVTomas Vikerfors
Tomas Vikerfors
To describe the outcome of using a rescue therapy including plasma exchange given to patients with a progressive acute disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Retrospective study. University and county hospital. Included were 76 consecutive patients (41 men and 35 women) treated with plasma exchange as rescue therapy besides optimal conventional therapy during a progressive course of disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, including acute renal failure. Of the 76 patients, 66% needed dialysis. The distribution was hemodialysis in 76%, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in 36%, continuous venovenous hemodialysis in 12%, and peritoneal dialysis in 24%. The median organ-failure score was 5 (range, 1-6). Seventy-two percent required mechanical ventilation; septic shock was present in 88%. The median septic shock score was 4 (range, 2-4). Nine patients had another reason than sepsis for the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Plasma exchange (centrifugation technique) was performed until disseminated intravascular coagulation was reversed (median, two times; range, 1-14). Besides antibiotics and fluid administration, most patients received heparin or low molecular weight heparin (77%), steroids (87%), and inotropes (88%). More than one vasoactive drug was used in 57% of the patients. Eighty-two percent of the patients survived and could leave the hospital. The previously observed survival rates by others for this category of patients would be <20%, and thus, the outcome in this study is significantly better. Plasma exchange using plasma as replacement may, in addition to conventional intensive care, help to reverse severe progressive disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and improve survival.

1 September 2001 in Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BNBirgit Näsström
Birgit Näsström
GOGunilla Olivecrona
Gunilla Olivecrona
TOThomas Olivecrona
Thomas Olivecrona
BSBernd Stegmayr
Bernd Stegmayr