The outstanding physio-pathological role played by integrin receptors in living subjects motivates the enormous interest shown by scientists worldwide for this topic. More than twenty years of research has spanned across the structural and functional elucidation of these proteins and over their antagonism-based biomedical applications. The proof-ofconcept stage, aimed at identifying potent inhibitors, covered a decade of studies, and paved the way for a more advanced era of research where these antagonist molecules were thrown into the deep end of applicative studies. This review intends to summarize the major efforts conducted thus far and focuses on the design, synthesis and biomedical applications of cyclic RGD-containing αvβ3 integrin antagonists, in both their small and macromolecular formats. In particular, Chapters 1 and 2 offer a comprehensive outlook on the rational basis for the design of integrin inhibitors, Chapter 3 chronicles the biological and medical applications of monofunctional RGD integrin ligands both in their monomeric and multimeric asset, and Chapter 4 illustrates the potential of RGD-based multifunctional systems in molecular medicine.

The antifungal activity of magnolol and honokiol, two naturally occurring hydroxylated biphenyls, and of their synthetic derivatives was evaluated on a collection of representative isolates of Fusarium oxysporum, F. solani and F. verticillioides of clinical and ecological concern. The tested compounds were proposed as a ‘natural’ alternative to conventional fungicides, even though a larger range of concentrations (5–400 μg/ml) was applied. The activity of magnolol and honokiol was compared with that of terbinafine (0.1–10 μg/ml), and fluconazole (1–50 μg/ml), two fungicides widely used in treating fungal infections on humans. Magnolol showed similar fungicidal activity compared to fluconazole, whereas honokiol was more effective in inhibiting mycelium growth compared to this fungicide on all tested clinical Fusarium spp. isolates. Compared to terbinafine, honokiol showed similar antifungal activity when tested on clinical F. solani isolates, whereas magnolol was less effective at all selected concentrations (5–400 μg/ml). The different position of the phenol-OH group, as well as its protection, explain different in vitro activities between magnolol, honokiol, and their derivatives. Furthermore, magnolol showed mycelium dry weight reduction at a concentration of 0.5 mM when tested on a set of agricultural isolates of Fusaria, leading to complete inhibition of some of them. Magnolol and honokiol are proposed as efficient and safe candidates for treating clinically relevant Fusaria.