Iron is a critical metal for several vital biological processes. Most of the body’s iron is bound to hemoglobin in erythrocytes. Iron from senescent red blood cells is recycled by macrophages in the spleen, liver and bone marrow. Dietary iron is taken up by the divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) in enterocytes and transported to portal blood via ferroportin (FPN), where it is bound to transferrin and taken up by hepatocytes, macrophages and bone marrow cells via transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1). While most of the physiologically active iron is bound hemoglobin, the major storage of most iron occurs in the liver in a ferritin-bound fashion. In response to an increased iron load, hepatocytes secrete the peptide hormone hepcidin, which binds to and induces internalization and degradation of the iron transporter FPN, thus controlling the amount of iron released from the cells into the blood. This review summarizes the key mechanisms and players involved in cellular and systemic iron regulation.

Virus-like particles (VLPs) derived from viral nucleocapsids are an important class of nanoparticles. The structure, uniformity, stability, and function of these VLPs have attracted scientists in utilizing them as a unique tool in various applications in biomedical fields. Their interaction with the innate immune system is of major importance for the adaptive immune response they induce. The innate immune cells and molecules recognize and interact with VLPs on the basis of two major characteristics: size and surface geometry. This review discusses the interaction of viral capsid-derived VLPs with the innate immune system.

IgE, the key molecule in atopy has been shown to bind two receptors, FcεRI, the high‐affinity receptor, and FcεRII (CD23), binding IgE with lower affinity. Whereas cross‐linking of IgE on FcεRI expressed by mast cells and basophils triggers the allergic reaction, binding of IgE to CD23 on B cells plays an important role in both IgE regulation and presentation. Furthermore, IgE‐immune complexes (IgE‐ICs) bound by B cells enhance antibody and T cell responses in mice and humans. However, the mechanisms that regulate the targeting of the two receptors and the respective function of the two pathways in inflammation or homeostasis are still a matter of debate. Here, we focus on CD23 and discuss several mechanisms related to IgE binding, as well as the impact of the IgE/antigen‐binding on different immune cells expressing CD23. One recent paper has shown that free IgE preferentially binds to FcεRI whereas IgE‐ICs are preferentially captured by CD23. Binding of IgE‐ICs to CD23 on B cells can, on one hand, regulate serum IgE and prevent effector cell activation and on the other hand facilitate antigen presentation by delivering the antigen to dendritic cells. These data argue for a multifunctional role of CD23 for modulating IgE serum levels and immune responses.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and may contribute to 60–70% of cases. Worldwide, around 50 million people suffer from dementia and the prediction is that the number will more than triple by 2050, as the population ages. Extracellular protein aggregation and plaque deposition as well as accumulation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, all leading to neurodegeneration, are the hallmarks of brains with Alzheimer’s disease. Therapeutic strategies including active and passive immunizations have been widely explored in the last two decades. Several compounds have shown promising results in many AD animal models. To date, only symptomatic treatments are available and because of the alarming epidemiological data, novel therapeutic strategies to prevent, mitigate, or delay the onset of AD are required. In this mini-review, we focus on our understanding of AD pathobiology and discuss current active and passive immunomodulating therapies targeting amyloid-β protein.

Background: Emerged mutations can be attributed to increased transmissibility of the B.1.617 and B.1.36 Indian delta variants of SARS‐CoV‐2, most notably substitutions L452R/E484Q and N440K, respectively, which occur in the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of the Spike (S) fusion glycoprotein.Objective: We aimed to assess the effects of mutations L452R/E484Q and N440K (as well as the previously studied mutation E484K present in variants B.1.351 and P.1) on the affinity of RBD for ACE2, SARS‐CoV‐2 main receptor. We also aimed to assess the ability of antibodies induced by natural infection or by immunization with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine to recognize the mutated versions of the RBD, as well as blocking the interaction RBD‐ACE2, an important surrogate readout for virus neutralization.Methods: To this end, we produced recombinant wild‐type RBD, as well as RBD containing each of the mutations L452R/E484Q, N440K, or E484K (the latest present in variants of concern B.1.351 and P.1), as well as the ectodomain of ACE2. Using Biolayer Interferometry (BLI), we measured the binding affinity of RBD for ACE2 and the ability of sera from COVID‐19 convalescent donors or subjects immunized with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine to block this interaction. Finally, we correlated these results with total anti‐RBD IgG titers measured from the same sera by direct ELISA.Results: The binding assays showed L452R/E484Q double‐mutant RBD to interact with ACE2 with higher affinity (K_D = 4.6 nM) than wild‐type (K_D = 21.3 nM) or single mutants N440K (K_D = 9.9 nM) and E484K (K_D = 19.7 nM) RBDs. Meanwhile, the anti‐RBD IgG titration resulted in lower recognition of mutants E484K and L452R/E484Q by infection‐induced antibodies, whereas only mutant E484K was recognized less by antibodies induced by vaccination. More interestingly, sera from convalescent as well as immunized subjects showed reduced ability to block the interaction between ACE2 and RBD mutants E484K and L452R/E484Q, as shown by the inhibition assays.Conclusion: Our data suggest that the newly emerged SARS‐CoV‐2 variant B.1.617, as well as the better‐studied variants B.1.351 and P.1 (all containing a mutation at position E484) display increased transmissibility both due to their higher affinity for the cell receptor ACE2 and their ability to partially bypass immunity generated against the wild‐type virus. For variant B.1.36 (with a point mutation at position N440), only increased affinity seems to play a role.

COVID-19 is a novel disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 which has conquered the world rapidly resulting in a pandemic that massively impacts our health, social activities, and economy. It is likely that vaccination is the only way to form “herd immunity” and restore the world to normal. Here we developed a vaccine candidate for COVID-19 based on the virus-like particle AP205 displaying the spike receptor binding motif (RBM), which is the major target of neutralizing antibodies in convalescent patients. To this end, we genetically fused the RBM domain of SARS-CoV-2 to the C terminus of AP205 of dimerized capsid proteins. The fused VLPs were expressed in E. coli, which resulted in insoluble aggregates. These aggregates were denatured in 8 M urea followed by refolding, which reconstituted VLP formation as confirmed by electron microscopy analysis. Importantly, immunized mice were able to generate high levels of IgG antibodies recognizing eukaryotically expressed receptor binding domain (RBD) as well as spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, induced antibodies were able to neutralize SARS-CoV-2/ABS/NL20. Additionally, this vaccine candidate has the potential to be produced at large scale for immunization programs.