Gelas Rubakula

Dr. Gelas Rubakula

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2022 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sohaib MustafaSohaib Mustafa
Sohaib Mustafa
WZWen Zhang
Wen Zhang
MSMuhammad Usman Shehzad
Muhammad Usman Shehzad
AAAliya Anwar
Aliya Anwar
GRGelas Rubakula
Gelas Rubakula
Every emerging technology has its pros and cons; health-conscious users pay more importance to healthy and environment-friendly technologies. Based on the UTAUT2 model, we proposed a comprehensive novel model to study the factors influencing consumers’ decision-making to adopt the technology. Compared to prior studies that focused on linear models to investigate consumers’ technology adoption intentions and use behavior. This study used a Structural Equation Modeling-fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (SEM-fsQCA) approach to account for the complexity of customers’ decision-making processes in adopting new technology. We collected valid responses from 830 consumers, analyzed them, and evaluated them using a deep learning SEM-fsQCA technique to capture symmetric and asymmetric relations between variables. We have extensively incorporated a health-consciousness attitude as a predictor and mediator to understand better the decision-making toward technology adoption, specifically 5G technology. All the factors tested in our model are statistically significant except the economic factors. Health-consciousness attitude (HCA) and behavioral intention (BI) found significant predictors and valid mediators in the process of 5G technology adoption.FsQCA provided six configurations to achieve high 5G adoption. The findings have significant practical ramifications for telecom corporations, advertisers, government officials, and key policymakers. Additionally, the study added substantial theoretical literature to technology adoption, particularly the adoption of 5G technology.

1 June 2017 in Habitat International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYEN Yat
YEN Yat
ZWZhanqi Wang
Zhanqi Wang
YSYumin Shi
Yumin Shi
Feng XuFeng Xu
Feng Xu
BSBunly Soeung
Bunly Soeung
SJSahim Abdalla Juma
Sahim Abdalla Juma

11 November 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GRGelas Rubakula
Gelas Rubakula
ZWZhanqi Wang
Zhanqi Wang
CWChao Wei
Chao Wei
The land policy in Tanzania, which has been implemented since 1995, aims to resolve land-use problems. This study explored the implementation of land policy in rural Tanzania. A cross-sectional multiple data collection technique was performed during the period July–November, 2017 to examine whether the policy has addressed land issues, including land conflicts. The findings indicate a significant association between immigrants and land conflicts, thus implying an insecure land tenure. The results also show that the realization of land policy was hampered by insufficient budgetary allocation and too few land staff to spearhead the land policy and legislation requirements. In view of these findings, this article suggests that the government must mobilize the resources required for registering communal land and simultaneously reinforce the use of social institutions, cultural norms, and adjoining landowners in securing land rights. This decision will encourage the majority of rural landowners (peasants and herdsmen) to invest in their land for higher and sustainable production.

14 September 2026
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
TJTeressa Juhaninmäki
Teressa Juhaninmäki
GRGelas Rubakula
Gelas Rubakula
This chapter critically examines the development policies of Tanzania and Finland through a decolonial lens, focusing on how each country positions itself and its partners in the global development landscape. It explores the power dynamics, language, and conditionalities embedded in their respective policies, particularly in the context of declining official development assistance and shifting geopolitical priorities. We argue that while both countries articulate aspirations for economic leadership and global influence, their policies reproduce colonial hierarchies and Eurocentric paradigms. Finland’s development discourse emphasizes economic self-interest and conditional partnerships, while Tanzania uses similar rhetoric in asserting regional leadership with the goal of decentering the Global North. This chapter highlights the persistence of epistemic coloniality in knowledge production and policy framing, calling for genuinely reciprocal and locally led development approaches. It concludes by advocating multidimensional partnerships that dismantle silos and foster accountability, mutual respect, and decolonial practices in development cooperation.