James T. Morris

Dr. James T. Morris

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2016 in Earth's Future
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJames T. Morris
James T. Morris
DBDonald C. Barber
Donald C. Barber
JCJohn C. Callaway
John C. Callaway
RCRandy Chambers
Randy Chambers
SHScott C. Hagen
Scott C. Hagen
CWCathleen Wigand
Cathleen Wigand
A mixing model derived from first principles describes the bulk density (BD) of intertidal wetland sediments as a function of loss on ignition (LOI). The model assumes that the bulk volume of sediment equates to the sum of self‐packing volumes of organic and mineral components or BD = 1/[LOI/k1 + (1‐LOI)/k2], where k1 and k2 are the self‐packing densities of the pure organic and inorganic components, respectively. The model explained 78% of the variability in total BD when fitted to 5075 measurements drawn from 33 wetlands distributed around the conterminous United States. The values of k1 and k2 were estimated to be 0.085 ± 0.0007 g cm−3 and 1.99 ± 0.028 g cm−3, respectively. Based on the fitted organic density (k1) and constrained by primary production, the model suggests that the maximum steady state accretion arising from the sequestration of refractory organic matter is ≤ 0.3 cm yr−1. Thus, tidal peatlands are unlikely to indefinitely survive a higher rate of sea‐level rise in the absence of a significant source of mineral sediment. Application of k2 to a mineral sediment load typical of East and eastern Gulf Coast estuaries gives a vertical accretion rate from inorganic sediment of 0.2 cm yr−1. Total steady state accretion is the sum of the parts and therefore should not be greater than 0.5 cm yr−1 under the assumptions of the model. Accretion rates could deviate from this value depending on variation in plant productivity, root:shoot ratio, suspended sediment concentration, sediment‐capture efficiency, and episodic events.

21 August 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCharles S. Hopkinson
Charles S. Hopkinson
JMJames T. Morris
James T. Morris
SFSergio Fagherazzi
Sergio Fagherazzi
WWWilfred Wollheim
Wilfred Wollheim
PRPeter A. Raymond
Peter A. Raymond
With sea level rise accelerating and sediment inputs to the coast declining worldwide, there is concern that tidal wetlands will drown. To better understand this concern, sources of sediment contributing to marsh elevation gain were computed for Plum Island Sound estuary, MA, USA. We quantified input of sediment from rivers and erosion of marsh edges. Maintaining elevation relative to the recent sea level rise rate of 2.8 mm yr−1 requires input of 32,299 MT yr−1 of sediment. The input from watersheds is only 3,210 MT yr−1. Marsh edge erosion, based on a comparison of 2005 and 2011 LiDAR data, provides 10,032 MT yr−1. This level of erosion is met by <0.1% of total marsh area eroded annually. Mass balance suggests that 19,070 MT yr−1 should be of tidal flat or oceanic origin. The estuarine distribution of 14C and 13C isotopes of suspended particulate organic carbon confirms the resuspension of ancient marsh peat from marsh edge erosion, and the vertical distribution of 14C‐humin material in marsh sediment is indicative of the deposition of ancient organic carbon on the marsh platform. High resuspension rates in the estuarine water column are sufficient to meet marsh accretionary needs. Marsh edge erosion provides an important fraction of the material needed for marsh accretion. Because of limited sediment supply and sea level rise, the marsh platform maintains elevation at the expense of total marsh area.


10 December 2005 in International Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJames T. Morris
James T. Morris
DPDwayne Porter
Dwayne Porter
MNMatt Neet
Matt Neet
PNPeter A Noble
Peter A Noble
LSLaura Schmidt
Laura Schmidt
JJJohn R. Jensen
John R. Jensen
Vertical elevation relative to mean sea level is a critical variable for the productivity and stability of salt marshes. This research classified a high spatial resolution Airborne Data Acquisition and Registration (ADAR) digital camera image of a salt marsh landscape at North Inlet, South Carolina, USA using an artificial neural network. The remote sensing‐derived thematic map was cross‐referenced with Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) elevation data to compute the frequency distribution of marsh elevation relative to tidal elevations. At North Inlet, the median elevation of the salt marsh dominated by Spartina alterniflora was 0.349 m relative to the North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88), while the mean high water level was 0.618 m (2001 to May, 2003) with a mean tidal range of 1.39 m. The distribution of elevations of Spartina habitat within its vertical range was normal, and 80% of the salt marsh was situated between a narrow range of 0.22 m and 0.481 m. Areas classified as Juncus marsh, dominated by Juncus roemerianus, had a broader, skewed distribution, with 80% of the distribution between 0.296 m and 0.981 m and a median elevation of 0.519 m. The Juncus marsh occurs within the intertidal region of brackish marshes and along the upper fringe of salt marshes. The relative elevation of the Spartina marsh at North Inlet is consistent with recent work that predicts a decrease in equilibrium elevation with an increasing rate of sea‐level rise and suggests that the marshes here have not kept up with an increase in the rate of sea‐level rise during the last two decades.

11 October 2013 in Wetlands
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJames T. Morris
James T. Morris
GSG. P. Shaffer
G. P. Shaffer
JNJ. A. Nyman
J. A. Nyman

25 March 2021 in AGU Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTorbjörn E. Törnqvist
Torbjörn E. Törnqvist
DCDonald R. Cahoon
Donald R. Cahoon
JMJames T. Morris
James T. Morris
JDJohn W. Day
John W. Day
Recent studies have produced conflicting results as to whether coastal wetlands can keep up with present‐day and future sea‐level rise. The stratigraphic record shows that threshold rates for coastal wetland submergence or retreat are lower than what instrumental records suggest, with wetland extent that shrinks considerably under high rates of sea‐level rise. These apparent conflicts can be reconciled by recognizing that many coastal wetlands still possess sufficient elevation capital to cope with sea‐level rise, and that processes like sediment compaction, ponding, and wave erosion require multidecadal or longer timescales to drive wetland loss that is in many cases inevitable.