Volker Beckmann

Prof. Volker Beckmann

University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2009 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RTRong Tan
Rong Tan
Volker BeckmannVolker Beckmann
Volker Beckmann
LBLeo van Den Berg
Leo van Den Berg
FQFutian Qu
Futian Qu

1 February 2011 in Ecological Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EME. Mettepenningen
E. Mettepenningen
Volker BeckmannVolker Beckmann
Volker Beckmann
JEJ. Eggers
J. Eggers

1 December 2006 in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Volker BeckmannVolker Beckmann
Volker Beckmann
CSClaudio Soregaroli
Claudio Soregaroli
JWJustus Wesseler
Justus Wesseler

1 April 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJasmin Günther
Jasmin Günther
Niels ThevsNiels Thevs
Niels Thevs
HGHans-Joerg Gusovius
Hans-Joerg Gusovius
ISIna Sigmund
Ina Sigmund
TBTorsten Brückner
Torsten Brückner
NANurbay Abdusalik
Nurbay Abdusalik

10 June 2009 in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Volker BeckmannVolker Beckmann
Volker Beckmann
JEJörg Eggers
Jörg Eggers
EMEvy Mettepenningen
Evy Mettepenningen
Since 1992 the provision of agri-environmental schemes (AESs) has been obligatory for member states of the European Union. However, decisions concerning the actual design of schemes and measures are left to member states who have to integrate this policy within their administrative structures and to comply with the general rules laid down in the EU rural development regulations. Over time, the respective council regulations have increasingly encouraged member states to design agri-environmental policy in a sub-national, decentralised and participatory way. However, the response to these opportunities has been quite diverse amongst the member states. This paper presents the results of a unique expert survey in nine different member states, focusing on decentralisation and participation. The results show that the way in which decisions are made affects the environmental effectiveness of AES. In particular, the involvement of actors at a local level and the participation of environmental NGOs have a positive effect on the environmental effectiveness of AES. Therefore, it is not surprising that most actors involved in decision making surrounding AESs are in favour of further decentralisation and participation in order to tackle agri-environmental problems. However, actors from the agricultural administration and agricultural associations, which are the most influential groups in terms of the design of AESs, oppose extending participation to the local level and to environmental associations.

10 March 2017 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Niels ThevsNiels Thevs
Niels Thevs
NSNurtazin Temirgalievich Sabir
Nurtazin Temirgalievich Sabir
Volker BeckmannVolker Beckmann
Volker Beckmann
RSRuslan Salmyrzauli
Ruslan Salmyrzauli
AKAltyn Khalil
Altyn Khalil
The Ili River is a transboundary river shared by China, upstream, and Kazakhstan, downstream. The Ili is the main water supplier to Lake Balkhash, the largest lake in Central Asia after desiccation of the Aral Sea. Agreements over water allocation have not been concluded between China and Kazakhstan. This paper investigated water consumption of agriculture and riparian ecosystems in the Ili river basin, to provide information for further debate on water allocation, through the Simplified Surface Energy Balance Index (S-SEBI) approach using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images. The overall water consumption in the Ili river basin was 14.3 km3/a in 2000, 17.2 km3/a in 2005, and 15 km3/a in 2014. In 2000, China and Kazakhstan consumed 38% and 62% of the water, respectively. By 2014, the relative share of China’s water consumption increased to 43%. In China, 80% of the water consumption is due to agriculture. High runoff during the past 10 years enabled increasing water consumption in China and sufficient water supply to agriculture and riparian ecosystems in Kazakhstan. When runoff of the Ili River decreases, as expected for most rivers in Central Asia, then irrigation efficiency has to be further increased in China, and irrigation systems in Kazakhstan have to be restored and modernized in order to reduce water consumption and protect Lake Balkhash and the riparian ecosystems.