James Tielsch

Dr. James Tielsch


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 February 2012 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJoanne W.Y. Yau
Joanne W.Y. Yau
SRSophie L. Rogers
Sophie L. Rogers
RKRyo Kawasaki
Ryo Kawasaki
ELEcosse L. Lamoureux
Ecosse L. Lamoureux
JKJonathan W. Kowalski
Jonathan W. Kowalski
TWTien Yin Wong
Tien Yin Wong
OBJECTIVE To examine the global prevalence and major risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) among people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A pooled analysis using individual participant data from population-based studies around the world was performed. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify all population-based studies in general populations or individuals with diabetes who had ascertained DR from retinal photographs. Studies provided data for DR end points, including any DR, proliferative DR, diabetic macular edema, and VTDR, and also major systemic risk factors. Pooled prevalence estimates were directly age-standardized to the 2010 World Diabetes Population aged 20–79 years. RESULTS A total of 35 studies (1980–2008) provided data from 22,896 individuals with diabetes. The overall prevalence was 34.6% (95% CI 34.5–34.8) for any DR, 6.96% (6.87–7.04) for proliferative DR, 6.81% (6.74–6.89) for diabetic macular edema, and 10.2% (10.1–10.3) for VTDR. All DR prevalence end points increased with diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, and blood pressure levels and were higher in people with type 1 compared with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS There are approximately 93 million people with DR, 17 million with proliferative DR, 21 million with diabetic macular edema, and 28 million with VTDR worldwide. Longer diabetes duration and poorer glycemic and blood pressure control are strongly associated with DR. These data highlight the substantial worldwide public health burden of DR and the importance of modifiable risk factors in its occurrence. This study is limited by data pooled from studies at different time points, with different methodologies and population characteristics.

1 September 1998 in Annals of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJulie Ann Sosa
Julie Ann Sosa
HBHelen M. Bowman
Helen M. Bowman
JTJames Tielsch
James Tielsch
NPNeil R. Powe
Neil R. Powe
TGToby A. Gordon
Toby A. Gordon
RURobert Udelsman
Robert Udelsman
To determine whether individual surgeon experience is associated with improved short-term clinical and economic outcomes for patients with benign and malignant thyroid disease who underwent thyroid procedures in Maryland between 1991 and 1996. There is a prevailing belief that surgeon experience affects patient outcomes in endocrine surgery, but there is a paucity of objective evidence outside of clinical series published by experienced surgeons that supports this view. A cross-sectional analysis of all patients who underwent thyroidectomy in Maryland between 1991 and 1996 was conducted using a computerized statewide hospital discharge data base. Surgeons were categorized by volume of thyroidectomies over the 6-year study period: A (1 to 9 cases), B (10 to 29 cases), C (30 to 100 cases), and D (>100 cases). Multivariate regression was used to assess the relation between surgeon caseload and in-hospital complications, length of stay, and total hospital charges, adjusting for case mix and hospital volume. The highest-volume surgeons (group D) performed the greatest proportion of total thyroidectomies among the 5860 discharges, and they were more likely to operate on patients with cancer. After adjusting for case mix and hospital volume, highest-volume surgeons had the shortest length of stay (1.4 days vs. 1.7 days for groups B and C and 1.9 days for group A) and the lowest complication rate (5.1% vs. 6.1% for groups B and C and 8.6% for group A). Length of stay and complications were more determined by surgeon experience than hospital volume, which had no consistent association with outcomes. Individual surgeon experience is significantly associated with complication rates and length of stay for thyroidectomy.

1 August 1991 in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAlfred Sommer
Alfred Sommer
JTJames Tielsch
James Tielsch
JKJoanne Katz
Joanne Katz
HQHarry A. Quigley
Harry A. Quigley
JGJohn D. Gottsch
John D. Gottsch
KSKuldev Singh
Kuldev Singh
• A detailed ocular examination, including perimetry, was conducted on 5308 black and white subjects aged 40 years and older in a population-based prevalence survey in east Baltimore, Md. Repeated, detailed examinations were carried out on selected subjects. Roughly half of all subjects with optic nerve damage from primary open angle glaucoma, regardless of race, were unaware that they had the condition. The average intraocular pressure (IOP) among black patients with glaucoma who were receiving treatment was virtually identical to that in those black patients who were not receiving treatment (median IOP, 20 mm Hg); treated eyes of white patients had a lower IOP than those eyes of white patients who were not receiving treatment (mean[±SD] IOP, 18.69 ±3.23 mm Hg vs 24.15±5.23 mm Hg;P<.001). The risk of glaucomatous optic nerve damage increased with the height of the screening IOP, particularly at levels of 22 to 29 and 30 mm Hg and above (relative rate compared with IOP of 15 mm Hg or lower, 12.8 and 40.1 mm Hg, respectively). More than half of all glaucomatous eyes had a screening IOP below 21 mm Hg, whether these eyes were receiving treatment or not. The IOP in glaucomatous eyes tended to rise on follow-up, in contrast with nonglaucomatous eyes in which the IOP was as likely to rise as to fall. Results confirmed that IOP is an important factor in glaucoma, but did not support the traditional distinction between "normal" and "elevated" pressure, nor its corollaries, "low-tension" glaucoma and "high-tension" glaucoma.

1 August 2013 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJoanne Katz
Joanne Katz
ALAnne Cc Lee
Anne Cc Lee
NKNaoko Kozuki
Naoko Kozuki
JLJoy E Lawn
Joy E Lawn
SCSimon Cousens
Simon Cousens
RBRobert E. Black
Robert E. Black

1 July 2013 in The Lancet Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALAnne Cc Lee
Anne Cc Lee
JKJoanne Katz
Joanne Katz
HBHannah Blencowe
Hannah Blencowe
SCSimon Cousens
Simon Cousens
NKNaoko Kozuki
Naoko Kozuki
RBRobert E Black
Robert E Black
National estimates for the numbers of babies born small for gestational age and the comorbidity with preterm birth are unavailable. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age (term-SGA and preterm-SGA), and the relation to low birthweight (<2500 g), in 138 countries of low and middle income in 2010. Small for gestational age was defined as lower than the 10th centile for fetal growth from the 1991 US national reference population. Data from 22 birth cohort studies (14 low-income and middle-income countries) and from the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health (23 countries) were used to model the prevalence of term-SGA births. Prevalence of preterm-SGA infants was calculated from meta-analyses. In 2010, an estimated 32·4 million infants were born small for gestational age in low-income and middle-income countries (27% of livebirths), of whom 10·6 million infants were born at term and low birthweight. The prevalence of term-SGA babies ranged from 5·3% of livebirths in east Asia to 41·5% in south Asia, and the prevalence of preterm-SGA infants ranged from 1·2% in north Africa to 3·0% in southeast Asia. Of 18 million low-birthweight babies, 59% were term-SGA and 41% were preterm-SGA. Two-thirds of small-for-gestational-age infants were born in Asia (17·4 million in south Asia). Preterm-SGA babies totalled 2·8 million births in low-income and middle-income countries. Most small-for-gestational-age infants were born in India, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Bangladesh. The burden of small-for-gestational-age births is very high in countries of low and middle income and is concentrated in south Asia. Implementation of effective interventions for babies born too small or too soon is an urgent priority to increase survival and reduce disability, stunting, and non-communicable diseases. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation by a grant to the US Fund for UNICEF to support the activities of the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG).

1 May 1994 in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEarl P. Steinberg
Earl P. Steinberg
JTJames Tielsch
James Tielsch
OSOliver D. Schein
Oliver D. Schein
JJJonathan C. Javitt
Jonathan C. Javitt
PSPhoebe Sharkey
Phoebe Sharkey
ASAlfred Sommer
Alfred Sommer
Objective: To describe the development and the performance of a brief questionnaire designed to measure functional impairment caused by cataract (the VF-14). Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited between July 15 and December 15, 1991. Setting: Patients were recruited from the practices of 70 ophthalmologists, located in Columbus, Ohio (N=21), St Louis, Mo (N=26), and Houston, Tex (N=23). Patients: Seven hundred sixty-six patients undergoing cataract surgery for the first time. Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative best corrected visual acuity in each eye; scores on the VF-14, a new index of functional impairment in patients with cataract; patient reports of overall trouble and satisfaction with their vision; and scores on the Sickness Impact Profile, a measure of general health status. Results: The VF-14 has high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=.85) and correlates more strongly with the overall self-rating of the amount of trouble and satisfaction patients have with their vision than do several measures of visual acuity or the Sickness Impact Profile score. The VF-14 score is moderately correlated with visual acuity in the better eye. Conclusions: The VF-14 is a reliable and valid measure of functional impairment caused by cataract and provides information not conveyed by visual acuity or a general measure of health status.