Aims Compare and characterize Chaetomium strains with special regard to their potentialities as biocontrol agents. Methods and results Twelve strains of the fungal genus Chaetomium from diverse ecological niches were identified as belonging to six different species. Large differences were observed between the strains with regard to temperature requirements for mycelial growth and pigmentation of culture filtrates. Culture filtrates and ethyl acetate extracts were assayed for fungicidal effects against important phytopathogens both on agar media and in multiwell plates. The samples from C. globosum were particularly active against Botrytis cinerea, Pyrenophora graminea and Bipolaris sorokiniana, while those from C. cochliodes and C. aureum were inhibitory towards Phytophthora infestans, and P. infestans and Fusarium culmorum, respectively. In order to narrow down the active principle, the most promising extracts were separated by preparative HPLC and the resulting fractions tested in bioassays. Chaetoglobosins were identified as active compounds produced by C. globosum. Conclusions The bioassays revealed C. aureum and C. cochliodes as promising candidates for use in biocontrol. Both showed remarkably good activity against the prominent plant pathogen P. infestans. Significance and Impact of study We provide the first systematic study comparing six different Chaetomium species with regard to their use as biocontrol agents.
Although synthetic pesticides play a major role in plant protection, their application needs to be reduced because of their negative impact on the environment. This applies also to copper preparations, which are used in organic farming. For this reason, alternatives with less impact on the environment are urgently needed. In this context, we evaluated eight isolates of the genus Lysobacter (mainly Lysobacter enzymogenes) for their activity against plant pathogens. In vitro, the investigated Lysobacter isolates showed broad antagonistic activity against several phytopathogenic fungi, oomycetes and bacteria. Enzyme assays revealed diverse activities for the tested isolates. The most promising L. enzymogenes isolate (LEC) was used for further detailed analyses of its efficacy and effective working concentrations. The experiments included in vitro spore and sporangia germination tests and leaf disc assays as well as ad planta growth chamber trials against Alternaria solani and Phytophthora infestans on tomato plants, Pseudoperonospora cubensis on cucumbers and Venturia inaequalis on young potted apple trees. When applied on leaves, dilutions of a culture suspension of LEC had a concentration-dependent, protective effect against the tested pathogens. In all pathosystems tested, the effective concentrations were in the range of 2.5–5% and similarly efficacious to common plant protection agents containing copper hydroxide, wettable sulphur or fenhexamid. Thus, the isolate of L. enzymogenes identified in this study exhibits a broad activity against common plant pathogens and is therefore a promising candidate for the development of a microbial biocontrol agent.
Late blight is a disease whose causative agent is the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. It is one of the most destructive pathogenic oomycetes and a major challenge to global tomato production. The pathogen is difficult to manage because of its ability to evolve thereby evading host resistance. The aim of this study was to screen for potential antagonists of P. infestans using a combination of culture and microbiome-based approaches. Samples were collected from healthy and P. infestans -infected tomato plants grown in soil collected from two organic tomato growers in the Rhine-Main area in Germany. A total of 246 fungal isolates were screened for their antagonistic activity against P . infestans . Most of the isolates that exhibited in vitro antagonistic activity were from the genera Penicillium, Trichoderma, Chlonostachys, Mortierella, and Pseudogymnoascus . Following a stepwise in vitro screening strategy that accounted for growth features, ecological aspects, taxonomic data, potential health risks, commercial properties, and antagonistic efficacy, five fungal isolates were eventually selected for plant trials. Chaetomium subaffine showed the highest inhibitory effect against P. infestans across three trials whereby the percentage of diseased leaf area reduced by 90% compared to the control. Chlonostachys and Pseudogymnoascus spp. were effective in two trials, while Trichoderma and Ctenomyces spp. showed weak disease suppressive effects. In parallel, we characterized the fungal microbiome of the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, and endosphere from healthy and diseased tomato plants using ITS-rRNA sequencing. The fungal community differed significantly between the two soil origins, but P. infestans did not significantly influence fungal microbiota composition. Notably, 70% of our antagonistic fungi from the culture collection were detected in the tomato microbiome. This work identified isolates of Chaetomium subaffine, Clonostachys sp., and Pseudogymnoascus sp. as potential biocontrol candidates promoting plant health. The findings highlight the importance of combined functional screening and microbiome profiling for identifying fungal antagonists.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the location of the pathogen inoculum on damage caused by Globisporangium (syn. Pythium) ultimum, Fusarium culmorum and Rhizoctonia solani in pot tests with maize. For this purpose, pathogen inoculum was added to potting substrate, and the resulting mix was used to fill the whole pot volume, the upper half, or the lower half of pots. The remaining volume was filled with non-inoculated substrate. In a second experimental approach, maize seeds were germinated in non-inoculated potting substrate and the seedlings were transferred to inoculated substrate. The seeds were untreated, treated with the chemical thiram, or treated with a bacterial or a fungal biocontrol agent. With each of the pathogens, the damage to the developing maize seedlings was the strongest when the seeds germinated in the inoculated potting substrate. When only the roots were in contact with the inoculum, there was limited damage by R. solani and F. culmorum, and no damage by G. ultimum. This implies that in experiments with artificial inoculation, the seeds should always be in immediate contact with the inoculum if a strong pathogenic effect is desired. Conversely, seed treatments must, in the first place, be able to protect the spermosphere, while the requirement to protect the roots at a distance from the seed seems to depend on the pathogen.