In Ho Kim

Dr. In Ho Kim

Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, No.29 Anseodong, Cheonan, Korea
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 January 2017 in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JOJu Kyoung Oh
Ju Kyoung Oh
EPEdward Alain Bernas Pajarillo
Edward Alain Bernas Pajarillo
JCJong Pyo Chae
Jong Pyo Chae
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
DYDong Soo Yang
Dong Soo Yang
DKDae-Kyung Kang
Dae-Kyung Kang
The chicken gastrointestinal tract contains a diverse microbiota whose composition and structure play important roles in gut functionality. In this study, microbial shifts resulting from feed supplementation with Bacillus subtilis CSL2 were evaluated in broilers challenged and unchallenged with Salmonella Gallinarum. To analyse bacterial community composition and functionality, 454 GS-FLX pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was performed. The Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline was used to analyse changes in the faecal microbiota over a 24-h period. A total of 718,204 sequences from broiler chickens were recorded and analysed. At the phylum level, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the predominant bacterial taxa. In Salmonella-infected chickens (SC), Bacteroidetes were more highly abundant compared to control (NC) and Bacillus-treated (BT) chickens. At the genus level, in the NC and BT groups, Lactobacillus was present at high abundance, and the abundance of Turicibacter, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroides increased in SC broilers. Furthermore, taxon-independent analysis showed that the SC and BT groups were compositionally distinct at the end of the 24-h period. Further analysis of functional properties showed that B. subtilis CSL2 administration increased gut-associated energy supply mechanisms (i.e. carbohydrate transport and metabolism) to maintain a stable microbiota and protect gut integrity. This study demonstrated that S. Gallinarum infection and B. subtilis CSL2 supplementation in the diet of broiler chickens influenced the diversity, composition, and functional diversity of the faecal microbiota. Moreover, the findings offer significant insights to understand potential mechanisms of Salmonella infection and the mode of action of probiotics in broiler chickens.

1 December 2014 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJ. S. Jeong
J. S. Jeong
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
Bacillus subtilis C-3102 has been used as a direct-fed microbial or probiotic product since 1986 to improve production performance in broilers worldw

1 February 2014 in Poultry Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZZZ. F. Zhang
Z. F. Zhang
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
This experiment was conducted to investigate the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bacillus subtilis, and Clostridium butyricum supplementation

1 October 2010 in Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QMQ. W. Meng
Q. W. Meng
LYL. Yan
L. Yan
XAX. Ao
X. Ao
TZT. X. Zhou
T. X. Zhou
JWJ. P. Wang
J. P. Wang
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
The study was conducted to determine the effects of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis endospore and Clostridium butyricum endospore complex) supplementation and different energy and nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs. A total of 96 pigs with initial BW of 47.50 ± 1.14 kg were used in a 10-wk experiment. Pigs were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with 2 levels of energy and nutrient density (low and high energy, CP, and Lys) and 0.2% probiotics according to their sex and BW (6 pens, with 2 gilts and 2 barrows/pen). From 0 to 5 wk, ADG and G:F, as well as the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of N and energy, were improved (P < 0.05) in the probiotic groups and in the high-energy and high-nutrient-density groups. From 6 to 10 wk, ADG and G:F, as well as the ATTD of DM, N, and energy, were increased (P < 0.01) when pigs were fed the high-energy and high-nutrient-density diets. Pigs fed the probiotic supplement or the high-energy and high-nutrient-density diets had increased (P < 0.01) ADG and G:F overall. Moreover, pigs fed the high-energy and high-nutrient-density diets had increased (P < 0.05) meat color scores, marbling scores, drip loss values, pH, and LM area (P < 0.05) compared with those fed the low-energy and low-nutrient-density diets, whereas the probiotic treatment groups had increased (P < 0.01) meat color scores, marbling scores, and redness values. The lightness and yellowness values in the low-energy and low-nutrient-density dietary treatments were greater (P < 0.05) than those in the high-energy and high-nutrient-density dietary treatments. Interactive effects of dietary energy and nutrient density and probiotics were also observed (P < 0.05) on the digestibility of N at wk 10 and energy at wk 5, as well as on meat firmness at the end of the experiment. In conclusion, dietary supplementation of probiotics increased growth performance throughout the experiment and exerted beneficial effects on ATTD. Meat quality was improved when pigs were fed high-energy and high-nutrient-density diets. Copyright © 2010. American Society of Animal Science .

17 July 2017 in Italian Journal of Animal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMohsen Mohammadi Gheisar
Mohsen Mohammadi Gheisar
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim
The trend in the use of phytobiotics in animal feed has been increased during last two decades. Investigations showed that excessive use of in-feed antibiotics will intensify the potential risks of increasing resistance in human pathogens. Bacterial resistance and antibiotic residues in animal products led to raising the concern in using antibiotics as growth promoters and finally resulted in the ban on using in-feed antibiotics in most of the developed countries. As an alternative, phytobiotics were recommended by researchers and nutritionists. Plenty of studies have been done using phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition so far. They have mostly shown the antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and growth promoting effects of phytobiotics. Antioxidative function of phytobiotics can positively affect the stability of animal feed and increase animal’s products quality and storage time. Generally, the available documents indicate the positive effects of phytobiotics on poultry and swine performance. Due to the contradictions in published results, further research and investigations are still necessary to elucidate various nutritional aspects of phytobiotics. In the following context, the authors try to provide an overview of the recently published results on application of phytobiotics and possible mode of actions as an alternative for in-feed antibiotics in poultry and swine nutrition.

28 December 2010 in Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJ. H. Cho
J. H. Cho
In Ho KimIn Ho Kim
In Ho Kim