Liwei Liu

Dr. Liwei Liu

General Research Service Center, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 May 2021 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XWXiaoxuan Wang
Xiaoxuan Wang
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
WZWeilan Zhang
Weilan Zhang
Xingmao MaXingmao Ma
Xingmao Ma

1 August 2021 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
Xingmao MaXingmao Ma
Xingmao Ma
YWYu-Min Wang
Yu-Min Wang
CLChun-Tang Lu
Chun-Tang Lu
WLWen-Shin Lin
Wen-Shin Lin

15 April 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
SHSheng-Hsin Hsieh
Sheng-Hsin Hsieh
SLSu-Ju Lin
Su-Ju Lin
Yu-Min WangYu-Min Wang
Yu-Min Wang
Wen-Shin LinWen-Shin Lin
Wen-Shin Lin
This study aimed to establish a machine learning (ML)-based rice blast predicting model to decrease the appreciable losses based on short-term environment data. The average, highest and lowest air temperature, average relative humidity, soil temperature and solar energy were selected for model development. The developed multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), Elman recurrent neural network (Elman RNN) and probabilistic neural network (PNN) were evaluated by F-measures. Finally, a sensitivity analysis (SA) was conducted for the factor importance assessment. The study result shows that the PNN performed best with the F-measure (β = 2) of 96.8%. The SA was conducted in the PNN model resulting in the main effect period is 10 days before the rice blast happened. The key factors found are minimum air temperature, followed by solar energy and equaled sensitivity of average relative humidity, maximum air temperature and soil temperature. The temperature phase lag in air and soil may cause a lower dew point and suitable for rice blast pathogens growth. Through this study’s results, rice blast warnings can be issued 10 days in advance, increasing the response time for farmers preparing related preventive measures, further reducing the losses caused by rice blast.

6 June 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
WCWinton Cheng
Winton Cheng
Hsin-Wei KuoHsin-Wei Kuo
Hsin-Wei Kuo
The integration of smart sensor networks and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies has emerged as a key strategy for enhancing productivity and sustainability in agriculture and aquaculture under increasing climate and resource pressures. This review consolidates empirical findings on the performance of sensor-driven systems in optimizing the management of water, nutrients, and energy. Studies have demonstrated that IoT-based irrigation systems can reduce water use by up to 50% without compromising yields, while precision nutrient monitoring enables a 20–40% reduction in fertilizer inputs. In aquaculture, real-time monitoring and automated interventions have improved feed conversion ratios, reduced mortality by up to 40%, and increased yields by 15–50%. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into IoT frameworks further enhances predictive capabilities and operational responsiveness. Despite these benefits, widespread adoption remains constrained by high infrastructure costs, limited sensor robustness, and fragmented policy support. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of current technologies, adoption barriers, and strategic directions for advancing scalable, sustainable, and data-driven food production systems.

3 January 2022 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
CLChun-Tang Lu
Chun-Tang Lu
Yu-Min WangYu-Min Wang
Yu-Min Wang
KLKuan-Hui Lin
Kuan-Hui Lin
Xingmao MaXingmao Ma
Xingmao Ma
Wen-Shin LinWen-Shin Lin
Wen-Shin Lin
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth prediction is key for precise rice production. However, the traditional linear rice growth forecasting model is ineffective under rapidly changing climate conditions. Here we show that growth rate (Gr) can be well-predicted by artificial intelligence (AI)-based artificial neural networks (ANN) and gene-expression programming (GEP), with accumulated air temperatures based on growth degree day (GDD). In total, 10,246 Gr from 95 cultivations were obtained with three cultivars, TK9, TNG71, and KH147, in Central and Southern Taiwan. The model performance was evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE), and relative RMSE (r-RMSE) in the whole growth period (lifecycle), as well as the average and specific key stages (transplanting, 50% initial tillering, panicle initiation, 50% heading, and physiological maturity). The results in lifecycle Gr modeling showed that ANN and GEP models had comparable r (0.9893), but the GEP model had the lowest RMSE (3.83 days) and r-RMSE (7.24%). In stage average and specific key stages, each model has its own best-fit growth period. Overall, GEP model is recommended for rice growth prediction considering the model performance, applicability, and routine farming work. This study may lead to smart rice production due to the enhanced capacity to predict rice growth in the field.

16 July 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Liwei LiuLiwei Liu
Liwei Liu
Yu-Min WangYu-Min Wang
Yu-Min Wang
This study aimed to develop a reliable turbidity model to assess reservoir turbidity based on Landsat-8 satellite imagery. Models were established by multiple linear regression (MLR) and gene-expression programming (GEP) algorithms. Totally 55 and 18 measured turbidity data from Tseng-Wen and Nan-Hwa reservoir paired and screened with satellite imagery. Finally, MLR and GEP were applied to simulated 13 turbid water data for critical turbidity assessment. The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean squared error (RMSE), and relative RMSE (R-RMSE) calculated for model performance evaluation. The result show that, in model development, MLR and GEP shows a similar consequent. However, in model testing, the R2, RMSE, and R-RMSE of MLR and GEP are 0.7277 and 0.8278, 0.7248 NTU and 0.5815 NTU, 22.26% and 17.86%, respectively. Accuracy assessment result shows that GEP is more reasonable than MLR, even in critical turbidity situation, GEP is more convincible. In the model performance evaluation, MLR and GEP are normal and good level, in critical turbidity condition, GEP even belongs to outstanding level. These results exhibit GEP denotes rationality and with relatively good applicability for turbidity simulation. From this study, one can conclude that GEP is suitable for turbidity modeling and is accurate enough for reservoir turbidity estimation.