In extreme marine environments, the interaction between offshore wind turbine pile foundations (OWTPFs) is critical, and the associated hydrodynamic loads are complex. This study focused on fixed OWTPFs and used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to numerically simulate the flow field around pile foundations under the combined action of focusing waves and current. The objective was to investigate the influence of different focusing wave and current parameters on the hydrodynamic properties of the pile foundations. The findings indicate the following: (1) When the wave and current directions are opposite, the maximum wave force on the pile foundations is greater than when they are aligned. (2) Large-amplitude focusing waves around pile foundations generate secondary loads, which are nonlinear and lead to a rapid increase in the wave force. These secondary loads are short-lived and particularly prominent near the front row of pile foundations. (3) The influence of the group pile effect diminishes under high-amplitude waves, where the wave component dominates the generation of the dimensionless wave force, and the impact of the current on this force decreases.

Two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are carried out to investigate the gap resonance phenomenon that occurs when free-surface waves travel past twin squares in tandem. The volume of fluid method is used to capture the free surface. Validation studies of the present numerical model are conducted for different incident wave frequencies. The numerical results agree well with the published experimental data in terms of the free surface elevations in the gap. The hydrodynamic characteristics of the water column in the gap are investigated at different incident wave frequencies and gap widths. It is found that the free surface elevation in the gap increases and then decreases with the increasing incident wave frequency. The horizontal force on the weather side square structure (the structure in front of the gap) reaches the peak value at a larger frequency than the gap resonance frequency, whereas the variation of the horizontal force on the lee side structure (the structure behind the gap) is in-phase with the free surface elevation in the gap. Moreover, the added mass of the water column in the gap increases with the increasing gap width, which results in the decrease of resonance amplitude and frequency in the gap. However, this does not necessarily reduce the peak value of the horizontal forces on the structures.

To accurately assess the dynamic stability of the damaged ship, this paper performs an experimental campaign and presents a feasible numerical method to analyze the effects of microscopic air–fluid interactions on the motion responses of the damaged ship. The numerical approach can be applied to solve the coupled hydrodynamic behavior between the flooding process and the motion responses of the damaged ship. The volume of fluid (VOF) method was applied to capture the interface of the free surface, while the dynamic fluid–body Interaction (DFBI) morphing technique was applied to deal with mesh adaption. In particular, the UDF (user-defined field) function was activated to realize the initial distribution of the free surface. Firstly, by comparing the experimental and numerical results, the reliability of visualizing the flooding process and dealing with the motion responses of the damaged ship was efficiently verified. The numerical flooding process was able to reproduce the hydrodynamic phenomenon well, including the flooding jet, interaction, and flow between adjacent compartments. The numerical roll motion curve of the damaged ship was consistent with that predicted in the model test, with an error in roll amplitude of no more than 4%. Secondly, based on the verified numerical method, it was seen from the results with different ventilation positions that not only the air compressibility due to varying levels of ventilation cannot be neglected in damage assessment, but also the position of the ventilation hole was crucial. This was because different positions will create different paths for the compressed air to overflow and affect air–fluid interactions. Thus, the flooding force and air-impacting force acting on the internal hull will be different. In conclusion, this paper introduces a new consideration in the damage assessment of ships.