Cross-view image matching has attracted extensive attention due to its huge potential applications, such as localization and navigation. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology has been developed rapidly in recent years, and people have more opportunities to obtain and use UAV-view images than ever before. However, the algorithms of cross-view image matching between the UAV view (oblique view) and the satellite view (vertical view) are still in their beginning stage, and the matching accuracy is expected to be further improved when applied in real situations. Within this context, in this study, we proposed a cross-view matching method based on location classification (hereinafter referred to LCM), in which the similarity between UAV and satellite views is considered, and we implemented the method with the newest UAV-based geo-localization dataset (University-1652). LCM is able to solve the imbalance of the input sample number between the satellite images and the UAV images. In the training stage, LCM can simplify the retrieval problem into a classification problem and consider the influence of the feature vector size on the matching accuracy. Compared with one study, LCM shows higher accuracies, and Recall@K (K ∈ {1, 5, 10}) and the average precision (AP) were improved by 5–10%. The expansion of satellite-view images and multiple queries proposed by the LCM are capable of improving the matching accuracy during the experiment. In addition, the influences of different feature sizes on the LCM’s accuracy are determined, and we found that 512 is the optimal feature size. Finally, the LCM model trained based on synthetic UAV-view images was evaluated in real-world situations, and the evaluation result shows that it still has satisfactory matching accuracy. The LCM can realize the bidirectional matching between the UAV-view image and the satellite-view image and can contribute to two applications: (i) UAV-view image localization (i.e., predicting the geographic location of UAV-view images based on satellite-view images with geo-tags) and (ii) UAV navigation (i.e., driving the UAV to the region of interest in the satellite-view image based on the flight record).

Land surface temperature (LST) is a key variable within Earth's climate system and a necessary input parameter required by numerous land–atmosphere models. It can be directly retrieved from satellite thermal infrared (TIR) observations, which contain many invalid pixels mainly caused by cloud contamination. To investigate the spatial and temporal variations in LST in China, long-term, high-quality, and spatiotemporally continuous LST datasets (i.e., all-weather LST) are urgently needed. Fusing satellite TIR LST and reanalysis datasets is a viable route to obtain long time-series all-weather LSTs. Among satellite TIR LSTs, the MODIS LST is the most commonly used, and a few corresponding all-weather LST products have been reported recently. However, the publicly reported all-weather LSTs were not available during the temporal gaps of MODIS between 2000 and 2002. In this study, we generated a daily (four observations per day) 1 km all-weather LST dataset for China's landmass and surrounding areas, the Thermal and Reanalysis Integrating Moderate-resolution Spatial-seamless (TRIMS) LST, which begins on the first day of the new millennium (1 January 2000). We used the enhanced reanalysis and thermal infrared remote sensing merging (E-RTM) method to generate the TRIMS LST dataset with the temporal gaps being filled, which had not been achieved by the original RTM method. Specifically, we developed two novel approaches, i.e., the random-forest-based spatiotemporal merging (RFSTM) approach and the time-sequential LST-based reconstruction (TSETR) approach, respectively, to produce Terra/MODIS-based and Aqua/MODIS-based TRIMS LSTs during the temporal gaps. We also conducted a thorough evaluation of the TRIMS LST. A comparison with the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) and ERA5-Land LST demonstrates that the TRIMS LST has similar spatial patterns but a higher image quality, more spatial details, and no evident spatial discontinuities. The results outside the temporal gap show consistent comparisons of the TRIMS LST with the MODIS LST and the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) LST, with a mean bias deviation (MBD) of 0.09/0.37 K and a standard deviation of bias (SD) of 1.45/1.55 K. Validation based on the in situ LST at 19 ground sites indicates that the TRIMS LST has a mean bias error (MBE) ranging from −2.26 to 1.73 K and a root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 0.80 to 3.68 K. There is no significant difference between the clear-sky and cloudy conditions. For the temporal gap, it is observed that RFSTM and TSETR perform similarly to the original RTM method. Additionally, the differences between Aqua and Terra remain stable throughout the temporal gap. The TRIMS LST has already been used by scientific communities in various applications such as soil moisture downscaling, evapotranspiration estimation, and urban heat island modeling. The TRIMS LST is freely and conveniently available at https://doi.org/10.11888/Meteoro.tpdc.271252 (Zhou et al., 2021).

Satellite passive microwave (MW) remote sensing has a better ability to observe land surface temperature (LST) in cloudy conditions than thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing. Due to the much greater thermal sampling depth (TSD) of MW, currently available MW LST do not represent the thermodynamic temperature of the land surface and, therefore, yield systematic differences from TIR LST. The TSD effect is particularly prominent over barren land and sparsely vegetated surfaces. Here, we present a novel TSD correction (TSDC) method to estimate the MW LST over barren land. The core of this method is a new formulation of the passive MW radiation balance equation, which allows linking MW effective physical temperature to the soil temperature at a specific depth. The TSDC method is applied to the 6.9-GHz channel of AMSR-E in northwestern China-western Mongolia and western Namibia (WN). Evaluation shows that LST estimated by the TSDC method agrees well with the MODIS LST. Validation based on in situ LSTs measured at the Gobabeb site in WN demonstrates the high accuracy of the TSDC method: it yields a root mean squared error of about 2-3 K and slight systematic error. In contrast, other methods without TSDC yield lower accuracies and significantly underestimate LST. Therefore, the TSDC method has the potential to generate MW LST with the same physical meaning and similar accuracy as TIR LST. This study provides implications for developing practical and accurate methods to estimate MW LST over other land surface types and at the global scale.