Anna Lokshin

Prof. Anna Lokshin

Departments of Pathology, Medicine, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2010 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZYZoya Yurkovetsky
Zoya Yurkovetsky
SSSteven Skates
Steven Skates
ALAleksey Lomakin
Aleksey Lomakin
BNBrian Nolen
Brian Nolen
TPTrenton Pulsipher
Trenton Pulsipher
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin
Purpose: Early detection of ovarian cancer has great promise to improve clinical outcome. Patients and Methods: Ninety-six serum biomarkers were analyzed in sera from healthy women and from patients with ovarian cancer, benign pelvic tumors, and breast, colorectal, and lung cancers, using multiplex xMAP bead-based immunoassays. A Metropolis algorithm with Monte Carlo simulation (MMC) was used for analysis of the data. Results: A training set, including sera from 139 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 149 patients with late-stage ovarian cancer, and 1,102 healthy women, was analyzed with MMC algorithm and cross validation to identify an optimal biomarker panel discriminating early-stage cancer from healthy controls. The four-biomarker panel providing the highest diagnostic power of 86% sensitivity (SN) for early-stage and 93% SN for late-stage ovarian cancer at 98% specificity (SP) was comprised of CA-125, HE4, CEA, and VCAM-1. This model was applied to an independent blinded validation set consisting of sera from 44 patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, 124 patients with late-stage ovarian cancer, and 929 healthy women, providing unbiased estimates of 86% SN for stage I and II and 95% SN for stage III and IV disease at 98% SP. This panel was selective for ovarian cancer showing SN of 33% for benign pelvic disease, SN of 6% for breast cancer, SN of 0% for colorectal cancer, and SN of 36% for lung cancer. Conclusion: A panel of CA-125, HE4, CEA, and VCAM-1, after additional validation, could serve as an initial stage in a screening strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

1 August 2006 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin
MWMathew Winans
Mathew Winans
DLDouglas Landsittel
Douglas Landsittel
AMAdele M. Marrangoni
Adele M. Marrangoni
LVLyudmila Velikokhatnaya
Lyudmila Velikokhatnaya
EGElieser Gorelik
Elieser Gorelik

15 April 2009 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VLVera Levina
Vera Levina
BNBrian M. Nolen
Brian M. Nolen
AMAdele M. Marrangoni
Adele M. Marrangoni
PCPeng Cheng
Peng Cheng
JMJeffrey R. Marks
Jeffrey R. Marks
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin
Purpose: Tumor cell growth and migration can be directly regulated by chemokines. In the present study, the association of CCL11 with ovarian cancer has been investigated. Experimental Design and Results: Circulating levels of CCL11 in sera of patients with ovarian cancer were significantly lower than those in healthy women or women with breast, lung, liver, pancreatic, or colon cancer. Cultured ovarian carcinoma cells absorbed soluble CCL11, indicating that absorption by tumor cells could be responsible for the observed reduction of serum level of CCL11 in ovarian cancer. Postoperative CCL11 levels in women with ovarian cancer negatively correlated with relapse-free survival. Ovarian tumors overexpressed three known cognate receptors of CCL11, CC chemokine receptors (CCR) 2, 3, and 5. Strong positive correlation was observed between expression of individual receptors and tumor grade. CCL11 potently stimulated proliferation and migration/invasion of ovarian carcinoma cell lines, and these effects were inhibited by neutralizing antibodies against CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5. The growth-stimulatory effects of CCL11 were likely associated with activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, MEK1, and STAT3 phosphoproteins and with increased production of multiple cytokines, growth factors, and angiogenic factors. Inhibition of CCL11 signaling by the combination of neutralizing antibodies against the ligand and its receptors significantly increased sensitivity to cisplatin in ovarian carcinoma cells. Conclusion: We conclude that CCL11 signaling plays an important role in proliferation and invasion of ovarian carcinoma cells and CCL11 pathway could be targeted for therapy in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, CCL11 could be used as a biomarker and a prognostic factor of relapse-free survival in ovarian cancer.

1 October 2007 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZYZoya Yurkovetsky
Zoya Yurkovetsky
STShlomo Ta'ASan
Shlomo Ta'ASan
SSSteve Skates
Steve Skates
ARAlex Rand
Alex Rand
ALAleksey Lomakin
Aleksey Lomakin
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin

18 April 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BNBrian M. Nolen
Brian M. Nolen
RBRandall E. Brand
Randall E. Brand
DPDenise Prosser
Denise Prosser
LVLiudmila Velikokhatnaya
Liudmila Velikokhatnaya
PAPeter J. Allen
Peter J. Allen
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin
The clinical management of pancreatic cancer is severely hampered by the absence of effective screening tools. Sixty-seven biomarkers were evaluated in prediagnostic sera obtained from cases of pancreatic cancer enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO). The panel of CA 19-9, OPN, and OPG, identified in a prior retrospective study, was not effective. CA 19-9, CEA, NSE, bHCG, CEACAM1 and PRL were significantly altered in sera obtained from cases greater than 1 year prior to diagnosis. Levels of CA 19-9, CA 125, CEA, PRL, and IL-8 were negatively associated with time to diagnosis. A training/validation study using alternate halves of the PLCO set failed to identify a biomarker panel with significantly improved performance over CA 19-9 alone. When the entire PLCO set was used for training at a specificity (SP) of 95%, a panel of CA 19-9, CEA, and Cyfra 21-1 provided significantly elevated sensitivity (SN) levels of 32.4% and 29.7% in samples collected 1 year prior to diagnosis, respectively, compared to SN levels of 25.7% and 17.2% for CA 19-9 alone. Most biomarkers identified in previously conducted case/control studies are ineffective in prediagnostic samples, however several biomarkers were identified as significantly altered up to 35 months prior to diagnosis. Two newly derived biomarker combinations offered advantage over CA 19-9 alone in terms of SN, particularly in samples collected >1 year prior to diagnosis. However, the efficacy of biomarker-based tools remains limited at present. Several biomarkers demonstrated significant velocity related to time to diagnosis, an observation which may offer considerable potential for enhancements in early detection.

15 June 2009 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VLVera V. Levina
Vera V. Levina
BNBrian Nolen
Brian Nolen
YSYunYun Su
YunYun Su
AGAndrew K. Godwin
Andrew K. Godwin
DFDavid Fishman
David Fishman
Anna LokshinAnna Lokshin
Anna Lokshin
There is increasing evidence that prolactin (PRL), a hormone/cytokine, plays a role in breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers via local production or accumulation. Elevated levels of serum PRL in ovarian and endometrial cancers have been reported, indicating a potential role for PRL in endometrial and ovarian carcinogenesis. In this study, we show that serum PRL levels are significantly elevated in women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer. We show dramatically increased expression of PRL receptor in ovarian and endometrial tumors as well as in endometrial hyperplasia, signifying the importance of PRL signaling in malignant and premalignant conditions. PRL mRNA was expressed in ovarian and endometrial tumors, indicating the presence of an autocrine loop. PRL potently induced proliferation in several ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines. Binding of PRL to its receptor was followed by rapid phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase 1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, CREB, ATF-2, and p53 and activation of 37 transcription factors in ovarian and endometrial carcinoma cells. PRL also activated Ras oncogene in these cells. When human immortalized normal ovarian epithelial cells were chronically exposed to PRL, a malignant transformation occurred manifested by the acquired ability of transformed cells to form clones, grow in soft agar, and form tumors in severe combined immunodeficient-beige mice. Transformation efficiency was diminished by a Ras inhibitor, providing proof that PRL-induced transformation uses the Ras pathway. In summary, we present findings that indicate an important role for PRL in ovarian and endometrial tumorigenesis. PRL may represent a risk factor for ovarian and endometrial cancers. [Cancer Res 2009;69(12):5226–33]