Mike Fell

Dr. Mike Fell

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2017 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell

1 December 2018 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MNMoira L. Nicolson
Moira L. Nicolson
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell
GHGesche M. Huebner
Gesche M. Huebner

1 August 2019 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGareth Powells
Gareth Powells
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell

1 September 2015 in Energy Research & Social Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell
DSDavid Shipworth
David Shipworth
GHGesche M. Huebner
Gesche M. Huebner
Clifford ElwellClifford Elwell
Clifford Elwell
Domestic demand-side response (DSR), if widely adopted, could help make electricity more secure, clean and affordable. However, little is known about consumer demand for different approaches to achieving DSR. This study aimed to gauge the acceptability of a range of DSR tariffs, and explore factors affecting it. An online between-subjects survey experiment was deployed to a representative sample of bill payers in Great Britain (N=2002), testing five tariffs including static/dynamic time of use (TOU) pricing (with/without automated response to price changes) and direct load control (DLC) of heating on a below-average flat rate.The tariff permitting limited DLC of heating was significantly (p<.01) more popular than the TOU tariffs. This was surprising given evidence for concern around loss of control in DLC, and suggests that for many people DLC is acceptable in principle (within tight bounds and with override ability). The option of automated response made dynamic TOU (otherwise the least popular tariff) as acceptable as static TOU. This is important because dynamic TOU offers additional network benefits, while automation can improve duration and reliability of response. The TOU tariffs were rated highly for giving people control over spending on electricity, but other factors were more associated with overall acceptance

1 February 2014 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell
LCLai Fong Chiu
Lai Fong Chiu
While almost 30% of UK households include children, little research has attempted to present children's perspectives on home energy use. This study used focus groups with children and parents at two primary (elementary) schools in London, UK, to explore home energy use and energy feedback. Energy was found to be a little-discussed subject at home. Children derived more motivation to save energy from responsibility conferred by school activities than other (e.g. environmental) concerns, and some connected energy saving with dangers of using electricity (e.g. fire). Material and social constraints (e.g. access to outside space, parents' environmental attitudes) meant that it was sometimes difficult for children to save energy even when motivated. However, parents showed greater inclination to pay attention to energy saving when framed as supporting their child's learning than as a financial or environmental concern. Children were disinclined to reduce energy-consuming activities such as watching television, and while parents complained about children's energy use most saw it as a low priority issue. Policy implications of these findings are considered, and the approach employed is argued to be an effective way of investigating children's perceptions around energy use

24 November 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASophie Adams
Sophie Adams
DBDonal Brown
Donal Brown
JÁJuan Pablo Cárdenas Álvarez
Juan Pablo Cárdenas Álvarez
RCRuzanna Chitchyan
Ruzanna Chitchyan
Mike FellMike Fell
Mike Fell
NWNicole Watson
Nicole Watson
In recent years, numerous studies have explored the opportunities and challenges for emerging decentralized energy systems and business models. However, few studies have focussed specifically on the economic and social value associated with three emerging models: peer-to-peer energy trading (P2P), community self-consumption (CSC) and transactive energy (TE). This article presents the findings of a systematic literature review to address this gap. The paper makes two main contributions to the literature. Firstly, it offers a synthesis of research on the social and economic value of P2P, CSC and TE systems, concluding that there is evidence for a variety of sources of social value (including energy independence, local benefits, social relationships, environmental responsibility and participation and purpose) and economic value (including via self-consumption of renewable electricity, reduced electricity import costs, and improved electricity export prices). Secondly, it identifies factors and conditions necessary for the success of these models, which include willingness to participate, participant engagement with technology, and project engagement of households and communities, among other factors. Finally, it discusses conflicts and trade-offs in the value propositions of the models, how the three models differ from one another in terms of the value they aim to deliver and some of the open challenges that require further attention by researchers and practitioners.