Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar

Dr. Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar

Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 January 2023 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrej ThurzoAndrej Thurzo
Andrej Thurzo
Martin StrungaMartin Strunga
Martin Strunga
Renata UrbanRenata Urban
Renata Urban
Jana SurovkovaJana Surovkova
Jana Surovkova
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
In this intellectual work, the clinical and educational aspects of dentistry were confronted with practical applications of artificial intelligence (AI). The aim was to provide an up-to-date overview of the upcoming changes and a brief analysis of the influential advancements in the use of AI in dental education since 2020. In addition, this review provides a guide for a dental curriculum update for undergraduate and postgraduate education in the context of advances in AI applications and their impact on dentistry. Unsurprisingly, most dental educators have limited knowledge and skills to assess AI applications, as they were not trained to do so. Also, AI technology has evolved exponentially in recent years. Factual reliability and opportunities with OpenAI Inc.’s ChatGPT are considered critical inflection points in the era of generative AI. Updating curricula at dental institutions is inevitable as advanced deep-learning approaches take over the clinical areas of dentistry and reshape diagnostics, treatment planning, management, and telemedicine screening. With recent advances in AI language models, communication with patients will change, and the foundations of dental education, including essay, thesis, or scientific paper writing, will need to adapt. However, there is a growing concern about its ethical and legal implications, and further consensus is needed for the safe and responsible implementation of AI in dental education.

1 September 2021 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMahya Hasanzade
Mahya Hasanzade
MAMahdi Aminikhah
Mahdi Aminikhah
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
MAMarzieh Alikhasi
Marzieh Alikhasi

29 December 2020 in International Journal of Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
MAMansour K. A. Assery
Mansour K. A. Assery
SBS. Ross Bryant
S. Ross Bryant
Health professionals, such as medical and dental clinicians, have scant understanding of patients’ experiences and perceptions of satisfaction. Nevertheless, implementing a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research practice in surgical sciences is necessary. Hence, the objective of this article was to better understand patients’ satisfaction with their medical and dental care. The methods of the current article are based on a narrative review of the literature strategy. A literature review was conducted using both EMBASE and Medline databases up to July 12, 2020, by combining keywords and terms related to “satisfaction theories” and “patient satisfaction,” and “medicine” or “dentistry/stomatology/odontology.” Patient satisfaction’s multidimensional nature has been established since the perceived reasons for satisfaction varied widely among patients. Many aspects of treatment influence participant satisfaction at different stages of the intervention process. An improved understanding of the basis for managing patients’ expectations with information reiteratively and efficiently may ultimately reduce patients’ potential for negative feelings toward the medical and dental treatment experience. Lastly, the consumerist method may misrepresent the still undertheorized concept of satisfaction in health service.

2 January 2016 in Cranio®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
SQSarah Qadeer
Sarah Qadeer
All disciplines of dentistry require that clinicians assess the articulation of the teeth/prosthesis with respect to simultaneous contacts, bite force and timing. This article intends to describe the advantages and limitations of the data acquired when using a computerized occlusal analysis as a dynamic occlusal indicator. A search of the literature was completed (Medline, PubMed) using the keywords occlusion, occlusal registration, computerized occlusal analysis and T-Scan for dental. According to the evidence available, the computerized occlusal analysis system is the only occlusal indicator that demonstrates the ability to provide quantifiable force and time variance in a real-time window from the initial tooth contact into maximum intercuspation. The reported advantages to accurately indicate occlusal contacts make the computerized occlusal analysis system a better occlusal indicator when compared with other non-digital convention indicator materials available.

1 March 2018 in Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Massimo Del FabbroMassimo Del Fabbro
Massimo Del Fabbro
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
SCStefano Corbella
Stefano Corbella
AEAhmed El-Kabbaney
Ahmed El-Kabbaney
IPIsabella Perondi
Isabella Perondi
STSilvio Taschieri
Silvio Taschieri

1 March 2020 in The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kelvin Ian AfrashtehfarKelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar
Massimo Del FabbroMassimo Del Fabbro
Massimo Del Fabbro