Cephalopods have been utilised in neuroscience research for more than 100 years particularly because of their phenotypic plasticity, complex and centralised nervous system, tractability for studies of learning and cellular mechanisms of memory (e.g. long-term potentiation) and anatomical features facilitating physiological studies (e.g. squid giant axon and synapse). On 1 January 2013, research using any of the about 700 extant species of “live cephalopods” became regulated within the European Union by Directive 2010/63/EU on the “Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes”, giving cephalopods the same EU legal protection as previously afforded only to vertebrates. The Directive has a number of implications, particularly for neuroscience research. These include: (1) projects will need justification, authorisation from local competent authorities, and be subject to review including a harm-benefit assessment and adherence to the 3Rs principles (Replacement, Refinement and Reduction). (2) To support project evaluation and compliance with the new EU law, guidelines specific to cephalopods will need to be developed, covering capture, transport, handling, housing, care, maintenance, health monitoring, humane anaesthesia, analgesia and euthanasia. (3) Objective criteria need to be developed to identify signs of pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm particularly in the context of their induction by an experimental procedure. Despite diversity of views existing on some of these topics, this paper reviews the above topics and describes the approaches being taken by the cephalopod research community (represented by the authorship) to produce “guidelines” and the potential contribution of neuroscience research to cephalopod welfare.

Nitric oxide (NO) is essential to many physiological functions and operates in several signaling pathways. It is not understood how and when the different isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the enzyme responsible for NO production, evolved in metazoans. This study investigates the number and structure of metazoan NOS enzymes by genome data mining and direct cloning of Nos genes from the lamprey. In total, 181 NOS proteins are analyzed from 33 invertebrate and 63 vertebrate species. Comparisons among protein and gene structures, combined with phylogenetic and syntenic studies, provide novel insights into how NOS isoforms arose and diverged. Protein domains and gene organization—that is, intron positions and phases—of animal NOS are remarkably conserved across all lineages, even in fast-evolving species. Phylogenetic and syntenic analyses support the view that a proto-NOS isoform was recurrently duplicated in different lineages, acquiring new structural configurations through gains and losses of protein motifs. We propose that in vertebrates a first duplication took place after the agnathan–gnathostome split followed by a paralog loss. A second duplication occurred during early tetrapod evolution, giving rise to the three isoforms—I, II, and III—in current mammals. Overall, NOS family evolution was the result of multiple gene and genome duplication events together with changes in protein architecture.