Francesco Sica

Dr. Francesco Sica

Doctoral School of Architecture and Construction, Department of Architecture and Design, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome 00185, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2017 in Journal of Property Investment & Finance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Antonio NesticòAntonio Nesticò
Antonio Nesticò
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica
Purpose: The decisions taken today relating to urban renewal interventions are rarely supported by logical and operational methodologies capable of effectively rationalising selection processes. For this purpose, it is necessary to propose and implement analysis models with the aim of promoting the sustainable development of the territory. The purpose of this paper is to define a model for the optimal allocation of scarce resources. Design/methodology/approach: The Discrete Linear Programming (DLP) is used for selecting investments aimed at achieving financial, social, cultural and environmental sustainability. Findings: The proposed model lends itself to the construction of investment plans on behalf of both types of decision makers, of both a public and a private nature. Research limitations/implications: All projects are evaluated according to multi-criteria logics, so that it is possible to find compromise solutions, in accordance with the stakeholders’ different preferences. Practical implications: The model, written with A Mathematical Programming Language using DLP logics, is tested – case study – so as to define an investment programme finalised for urban renewal of a vast area. Social implications: The proposed econometric model makes it possible to obtain the optimal combination of projects for urban renewal with a view to achieving the sustainable development of the territory. Originality/value: Using the proposed model, all projects are evaluated according to multi-criteria logics, so that it is possible to find compromise solutions, in accordance with the stakeholders’ different preferences.

24 April 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pierluigi MoranoPierluigi Morano
Pierluigi Morano
Francesco TajaniFrancesco Tajani
Francesco Tajani
Maria Rosaria GuariniMaria Rosaria Guarini
Maria Rosaria Guarini
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica
From the 21st century to the present(2021), a worldwide awareness that cities’ development must be based on projects for socio-economic growth and environmental protection is increasing. World governmental agencies and the European Union have suggested action strategies for the construction of «prototype cities» whose value must be founded on the inclusion and/or preservation of anthropic-natural elements and their effects on territories. In order to minimize the theoretical–practical gap between planning and project design with a view to sustainable development and the evaluation of their performance from economic, social and environmental points of view, the present contribution aims to outline a framework useful for systematizing the main scientific contributions concerning sustainability and the evaluation of urban transformation projects. The objective is pursued by analyzing bibliographic references with specific regard to the use of logical-operative methodologies used to rationalize the processes of interventions’ evaluation and selection. The task of examining the available literature is carried out with an investigation protocol of four sequential steps. From the implementation of the last one, the evidence expressing the heterogeneity of the examples in the literature is described. Accordingly, the theoretical-methodological framework for the project evaluation from an urban sustainability perspective is illustrated.

15 November 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica
Francesco TajaniFrancesco Tajani
Francesco Tajani
MARIA PAZ SAEZ-PEREZMARIA PAZ SAEZ-PEREZ
MARIA PAZ SAEZ-PEREZ
JMJosé Marín-Nicolás
José Marín-Nicolás
Instead of the well-known three-pillar model of economic, social, and environmental sustainability, the shift in valuation paradigm to the sustainable realm needs a fundamental methodological and operational modification, with a focus on determining and describing metrics, criteria, and performance indicators that can be used to support Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG)-based valuation practices. As of now (2023), there is significant language and semantic heterogeneity in the indicators, standards, and operational methods to be used while conducting ESG assessments and analyses. The primary objective of this contribution is to analyze the current ESG criteria/indicators that can be found in relevant scientific publications. A scoping review of the recent ESG literature (2015–2023) as well as a content study of the reports from the most influential worldwide rating agencies—which are now utilized as models in the usage of criteria, indicators, and ESG metric applications—have been both carried out. A total of 182 indicators (78 environmental, 64 social, and 40 governance) have been gathered as a result of the investigation. In the endeavor to design and apply ESG-focused valuation and analytical practice, sets of Key Performance Indicators for the three dimensions have been found using cluster analysis and text mining, and a reference taxonomy has been provided based on them.

1 January 2006
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
RARoberto Avanzi
Roberto Avanzi
VDVassil Dimitrov
Vassil Dimitrov
CDChristophe Doche
Christophe Doche
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica

1 January 2012
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PLPatrick Longa
Patrick Longa
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica

9 January 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Antonio NesticòAntonio Nesticò
Antonio Nesticò
Maria Rosaria GuariniMaria Rosaria Guarini
Maria Rosaria Guarini
Pierluigi MoranoPierluigi Morano
Pierluigi Morano
Francesco SicaFrancesco Sica
Francesco Sica
The second half of the 20th century was characterized by rapid growth of the urban population and lack of attention to environmental quality in the urbanizes territories. Thus, the development of many cities during that period took place through policies which, over time, resulted in a disaggregated landscape, both in morphological and functional terms. In some cases, these policies have caused the creation of land portions without a specific characterization, and the generation of urban voids that negatively affect the city’s development. To solve this problem, the public administration sectors of many countries are looking for new intervention strategies that are feasible from a social and economic point of view which are able to guarantee sustainable development. From this perspective, the execution of urban regeneration initiatives, including forestation, allows for the improvement of both environmental quality and citizens’ well-being, and promotes economic development. Considering the multiple effects that these initiatives can generate and the limited availability of public and private resources, it is appropriate to use multi-criteria decision support tools through which it is possible to evaluate the interventions’ complexity and best identify the city areas that lend themselves to be recovered and improved through the forestation. The aim of this work is to develop a support tool for public administrations aimed at identifying the optimal forestry projects’ location according to criteria that not only refer to financial type, but also their social, cultural, and environmental nature. Using Discrete Linear Programming algorithms, the model has been tested through a theoretical case study and reveals the advantages and limitations of the model, as well as future research prospects.