Stefania Crisci

Dr. Stefania Crisci

Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples,
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRaffaele Di Francia
Raffaele Di Francia
SCStefania Crisci
Stefania Crisci
AMAngela De Monaco
Angela De Monaco
CCConcetta Cafiero
Concetta Cafiero
ARAgnese Re
Agnese Re
APAntonio Pinto
Antonio Pinto
Cytarabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside analog, commonly used in multiagent chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma, as well as for neoplastic meningitis. Ara-C-based chemotherapy regimens can induce a suboptimal clinical outcome in a fraction of patients. Several studies suggest that the individual variability in clinical response to Leukemia & Lymphoma treatments among patients, underlying either Ara-C mechanism resistance or toxicity, appears to be associated with the intracellular accumulation and retention of Ara-CTP due to genetic variants related to metabolic enzymes. Herein, we reported (a) the latest Pharmacogenomics biomarkers associated with the response to cytarabine and (b) the new drug formulations with optimized pharmacokinetics. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with detailed and comprehensive information on the effects of Ara-C-based therapies, from biological to clinical practice, maintaining high the interest of both researcher and clinical hematologist. This review could help clinicians in predicting the response to cytarabine-based treatments.

22 May 2018 in Current Cancer Drug Targets
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RFRaffaele Di Francia
Raffaele Di Francia
AMAngela De Monaco
Angela De Monaco
MSMariangela Saggese
Mariangela Saggese
GIGiancarla Iaccarino
Giancarla Iaccarino
SCStefania Crisci
Stefania Crisci
APAntonio Pinto
Antonio Pinto
Background: Drugs for targeted therapies are primarily Small Molecules Inhibitors (SMIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), interfering RNA molecules and microRNA. The use of these new agents generates a multifaceted step in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of these drugs. Individual PK variability is often large, and unpredictability observed in the response to the pharmacogenetic profile of the patient (e.g. cytochome P450 enzyme), patient characteristics such as adherence to treatment and environmental factors. Objective: This review aims to overview the latest anticancer drugs eligible for targeted therapies and the most recent finding in pharmacogenomics related to toxicity/resistance of either individual gene polymorphisms or acquired mutation in a cancer cell. In addition, an early outline evaluation of the genotyping costs and methods has been taken into consideration. Future Outlook: To date, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mAbs and SMIs is not yet supported by heavy scientific evidence. Extensive effort should be made for targeted therapies to better define concentration-effect relationships and to perform comparative randomized trials of classic dosing versus PK-guided adaptive dosing. The detection of individual pharmacogenomics profile could be the key for the oncologists that will have new resources to make treatment decisions for their patients in order to maximize the benefit and minimize the toxicity. Based on this purpose, the clinician should evaluate advantages and limitations, in terms of costs and applicability, of the most appropriate pharmacological approach to performing a tailored therapy.

18 May 2011 in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VDVelia D’Angelo
Velia D’Angelo
MRMaria Ramaglia
Maria Ramaglia
AIAdriana Iannotta
Adriana Iannotta
SCStefania Crisci
Stefania Crisci
PIPaolo Indolfi
Paolo Indolfi
FCFiorina Casale
Fiorina Casale

28 July 2019 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCStefania Crisci
Stefania Crisci
FAFilomena Amitrano
Filomena Amitrano
MSMariangela Saggese
Mariangela Saggese
TMTommaso Muto
Tommaso Muto
SSSabrina Sarno
Sabrina Sarno
RFRaffaele Di Francia
Raffaele Di Francia
The upgraded knowledge of tumor biology and microenviroment provides information on differences in neoplastic and normal cells. Thus, the need to target these differences led to the development of novel molecules (targeted therapy) active against the neoplastic cells’ inner workings. There are several types of targeted agents, including Small Molecules Inhibitors (SMIs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), interfering RNA (iRNA) molecules and microRNA. In the clinical practice, these new medicines generate a multilayered step in pharmacokinetics (PK), which encompasses a broad individual PK variability, and unpredictable outcomes according to the pharmacogenetics (PG) profile of the patient (e.g., cytochrome P450 enzyme), and to patient characteristics such as adherence to treatment and environmental factors. This review focuses on the use of targeted agents in-human phase I/II/III clinical trials in cancer-hematology. Thus, it outlines the up-to-date anticancer drugs suitable for targeted therapies and the most recent finding in pharmacogenomics related to drug response. Besides, a summary assessment of the genotyping costs has been discussed. Targeted therapy seems to be an effective and less toxic therapeutic approach in onco-hematology. The identification of individual PG profile should be a new resource for oncologists to make treatment decisions for the patients to minimize the toxicity and or inefficacy of therapy. This could allow the clinicians to evaluate benefits and restrictions, regarding costs and applicability, of the most suitable pharmacological approach for performing a tailor-made therapy.

1 January 2005 in Cancer Biology & Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RARaffaele Addeo
Raffaele Addeo
Michele CaragliaMichele Caraglia
Michele Caraglia
Alfonso BaldiAlfonso Baldi
Alfonso Baldi
VDVelia D’aNgelo
Velia D’aNgelo
FCFiorina Casale
Fiorina Casale
PIPaolo Indolfi
Paolo Indolfi
Molecular parameters involved in the prediction of response of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are still unclear. We have evaluated the expression and mutational status of p53 and the expression of bcl-x(L) and bax in a series of 62 consecutive children (median age: 4 years; 38 males and 24 females) affected by de novo ALL. Alterations and overexpression of p53 were uncommon events (9/62, 14.5%) while bcl-x(L) and bax overexpression were frequent (about 70%). EFS was directly correlated to age<6 years (p=0.0178), nonT phenotype (p=0.0470), WBC at diagnosis

4 September 2025 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPMaria Cristina Pirosa
Maria Cristina Pirosa
ABAlessio Bruscaggin
Alessio Bruscaggin
LBLodovico Terzi di Bergamo
Lodovico Terzi di Bergamo
MSMatin Salehi
Matin Salehi
FJFederico Jauk
Federico Jauk
DRDavide Rossi
Davide Rossi
This study analyzed the genetics of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) by using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Two genetic subtypes were identified, differing in genetic instability mechanisms: one subtype (64% of cases) showed a higher mutation load and a higher fraction of mutations associated with activation-induced cytidine deaminase and microsatellite instability signatures, whereas the other subtype (36% of cases) exhibited chromosomal instability with more somatic copy number alterations. Whole-genome duplication was more common in cHL compared with other B-cell tumors and emerged as a prognostic biomarker for patients undergoing Adriamycin (doxorubicin)-bleomycin-vinblastine-dacarbazine–based therapy. Noncoding regulatory mutations, similar to those in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, were highly prevalent in 86% of cHL. A recurrent somatic expression quantitative trait locus (seQTL) involving the BCL6 gene was found in 30% of cases. The seQTL of BCL6 aligned with accessible chromatin and increased H3K27 acetylation in cHL, disrupted PRDM1 binding, and co-occurred with BCL6 expression in cHL cells. Weak to strong expression of BCL6 was observed in 68% of cases, and BCL6 expression associated with gene repression similarly in cHL and germinal center B cells. After BCL6 degradation, the core set of genes directly bound and regulated by BCL6 was derepressed in cHL, and proliferation was impaired. The number and clonality of neoantigens was associated with tumor microenvironment type and response to checkpoint blockade. Finally, ctDNA analysis was suggested as a tool to distinguish ambiguous positron emission tomography/computed tomography–positive lesions after treatment.