(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for acute respiratory failure with few absolute but many relative contraindications. The provider in charge often has a difficult time weighing indications and contraindications to anticipate if the patient will benefit from this treatment, a decision that often decides life and death for the patient. To assist in this process in coming to a good evidence-based decision, we reviewed the available literature. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review through a literature search of the MEDLINE database of former and current absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. (3) Results: The following relative and absolute contraindications were identified in the literature: absolute—refusal of the use of extracorporeal techniques by the patient, advanced stage of cancer, fatal intracerebral hemorrhage/cerebral herniation/intractable intracranial hypertension, irreversible destruction of the lung parenchyma without the possibility of transplantation, and contraindications to lung transplantation; relative—advanced age, immunosuppressed patients/pharmacological immunosuppression, injurious ventilator settings > 7 days, right-heart failure, hematologic malignancies, especially bone marrow transplantation and graft-versus-host disease, SAPS II score ≥ 60 points, SOFA score > 12 points, PRESERVE score ≥ 5 points, RESP score ≤ −2 points, PRESET score ≥ 6 points, and “do not attempt resuscitation” order (DN(A)R status). (4) Conclusions: We provide a simple-to-follow algorithm that incorporates absolute and relative contraindications to the initiation of ECMO treatment. This algorithm attempts to weigh pros and cons regarding the benefit for an individual patient and hopefully assists caregivers to make better, informed decisions.

Neurologic complications following acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are well described, however, information on the neurologic outcome regarding peripheral nervous system complications in critically ill ARDS patients, especially those who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are lacking. In this prospective observational study 28 ARDS patients who survived after ECMO or conventional nonECMO treatment were examined for neurological findings. Nine patients had findings related to cranial nerve innervation, which differed between ECMO and nonECMO patients (p = 0.031). ECMO patients had severely increased patella tendon reflex (PTR) reflex levels (p = 0.027 vs. p = 0.125) as well as gastrocnemius tendon reflex (GTR) (p = 0.041 right, p = 0.149 left) were affected on the right, but not on the left side presumably associated with ECMO cannulation. Paresis (14.3% of patients) was only found in the ECMO group (p = 0.067). Paresthesia was frequent (nonECMO 53.8%, ECMO 62.5%; p = 0.064), in nonECMO most frequently due to initial trauma and polyneuropathy, in the ECMO group mainly due to impairments of N. cutaneus femoris lateralis (4 vs. 0; p = 0.031). Besides well-known central neurologic complications, more subtle complications were detected by thorough clinical examination. These findings are sufficient to hamper activities of daily living and impair quality of life and psychological health and are presumably directly related to ECMO therapy.

Objectives: Cholestasis and elevated serum bile¹ acid levels are common in critically ill patients. This study aims to define the specific pattern of bile acids associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the changes in pattern over time. Methods: Prospective observational study. Serum samples of 70 ARDS patients were analyzed for primary bile acids (cholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid) and secondary bile acids (deoxycholic acid, litocholic acid, and ursodeoxycholic acid) as well as their glycine and taurine glycation products. Results: Primary bile acid levels increased from day zero to day five by almost 50% (p<0.05). This change bases on a statistically significant increase in all primary bile acids between day 0 and day 5 (cholic acid [CA] p=0.001, taurocholic acid [TCA] p=0.004, glycocholic acid [GCA] p<0.001, chenodeoxycholic acid [CDCA] p=0.036, taurochenodeoxycholic acid [TCDCA] p<0.001, glycochenodeoxycholic acid [GCDCA] p<0.001). Secondary bile acids showed predominantly decreased levels on day 0 compared to the control group and remained stable throughout the study period; the differences between day zero and day five were not statistically significant. Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher levels of TCDCA on day 5 (p<0.05) than survivors. This value was also independently associated with survival in a logistic regression model with an odds ratio of 2.24 (95% CI 0.53–9.46). Conclusions: The individual bile acid profile of this ARDS patient cohort is unique compared to other disease states. The combination of changes in individual bile acids reflects a shift toward the acidic pathway of bile acid synthesis. Our results support the concept of ARDS-specific plasma levels of bile acids in a specific pattern as an adaptive response mechanism.

This report presents a case of endotracheal metastasis in which elective veno–venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) was used to undergo tracheal laser-surgery prior to establishment of a definitive airway.