Jiangang Jiao

Dr. Jiangang Jiao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 November 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiangdi Zhou
Jiangdi Zhou
BLBinkai Li
Binkai Li
MHMaoyong He
Maoyong He
JJJiangang Jiao
Jiangang Jiao
ZTZhongli Tang
Zhongli Tang
ZLZhengyan Li
Zhengyan Li
With the development of green energy, the demand for lithium resources has increased sharply, and salt lakes are an important source of lithium. In China, the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau has substantial lithium resources, and the Bangor Co Salt Lake is a typical Li-rich carbonate salt lake in northern Tibet. Research into the lithium source of the lake is of great significance for future sustainable industrial development. This article selects the Bangor Co Salt Lake recharge water system (river and cold spring water) and brine samples as the research objects, conducts hydrochemical composition and isotope testing of the water body, and determines the anions, cations, and B isotopes of the samples. This article uses the Piper three-line diagram, Gibbs diagram, and ion ratio relationship to study the hydrochemical characteristics and major ion sources of recharge water systems and salt lakes. The results indicate that the hydrochemical type has transitioned from the strong carbonate type to the moderate carbonate type from the recharge area to the lake area. The major source of ions in lakes is the weathering products of carbonate rocks, followed by evaporite and silicate solutes. The enrichment of lithium in salt lakes is mainly related to the contribution of rivers, followed by geothermal-related cold springs, and early sedimentary carbonate minerals may also make potential contributions. These findings provide a scientific basis for the mechanism of lithium enrichment, as well as for the further development and evaluation of lithium resources.

28 September 2019 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJiangang Jiao
Jiangang Jiao
FHFeng Han
Feng Han
LZLiandang Zhao
Liandang Zhao
JDJun Duan
Jun Duan
MWMengxi Wang
Mengxi Wang
The Jinchuan Ni-Cu-PGE deposit is the single largest magmatic Ni-sulfide deposit in the world, with three different hypotheses on its ore-forming processes (e.g., in-situ sulfide segregation of sulfide-bearing magma, deep segregation with multiple injections of magma, and hydrothermal superimposition) mainly based on study of whole-rock geochemistry and isotopes (e.g., S-Sr-Nd-Hf). In this study, we mainly concentrated on magnetite textural and geochemical characteristics from different sulfide ores to clarify the genetic types and geochemical difference of the Jinchuan magnetite, and to explore a new credible ore-forming process by magnetite formation process when combined with detailed deposit geology. Three types of magnetite from massive and disseminated sulfide ores were observed by different textural analysis, and they were shown to have different genetic types (mainly in geochemistry) and trace elemental features. Type I magnetite is subhedral to anhedral from massive Ni- (or Fe-) and Cu-rich sulfide ores, with apparent magmatic origin, whereas Type II (dendritic or laminar crystals) and III magnetite (granular crystals as disseminated structures) from disseminated Cu-rich sulfide ores may have precipitated from late stage of melts evolved from a primitive Fe-rich and sulfide-bearing system with magmatic origin, but their geochemistry being typical of hydrothermal magnetite, videlicet, depletions of Ti (< 20 ppm), Al (< 51 ppm), Zr (0.01–0.57 ppm), Hf (0.03–0.06 ppm), Nb (0.01–0.14 ppm), and Ta (0.01–0.21 ppm). Such different types of magnetite can be clearly distinguished from concentrations and ratios of their trace elements, such as Ti, V, Co, Ni, Zn, Zr, Sn, Ga, and Ni/Cr. Those different types of Jinchuan magnetite crystallized from (evolved) sulfide-bearing systems and their geochemistries in trace elements are controlled mainly by evolution of ore-related systems and geochemical parameters (e.g., T and fO2), with the former playing a predominant role. Combining the previous literature with this study, we propose that the Jinchuan deposit formed by multiple pluses of sulfide-bearing magma during fractional crystallization, with the emplacing of more fractionated and sulfide-bearing magma during sulfide segregation playing a predominant role. During this multiple emplacement and evolving of sulfide-bearing systems, Type I magmatic magnetite crystallized from primitive and evolved Fe-rich MSS (monosulfide solid solution), while Type II and III magnetite crystallized from evolved Fe-rich MSS to Cu-rich ISS (intermediate solid solution) during sulfide fractionation, with those Type II and III magnetite having much higher Cu contents compared with that of Type I magnetite.

11 June 2019 in Journal of Earth Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HRHuichao Rui
Huichao Rui
JJJiangang Jiao
Jiangang Jiao
MXMingzhe Xia
Mingzhe Xia
JYJingsui Yang
Jingsui Yang
ZXZhaode Xia
Zhaode Xia

7 April 2025 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiangdi Zhou
Jiangdi Zhou
MHMaoyong He
Maoyong He
BLBinkai Li
Binkai Li
JJJiangang Jiao
Jiangang Jiao
ZTZhongli Tang
Zhongli Tang
HRHuihui Rao
Huihui Rao
The implementation of the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality strategy has led to a steady increase in the supply of lithium resources. Brine is one of the important sources of lithium, and the extraction of Li from carbonate-type brine is particularly straightforward. Research into the source of materials and hydrological processes of brine is crucial for the sustainable development of lithium in carbonate-type brine. As a fluid-mobile and metallogenic element, lithium has a significant mass difference between its stable isotopes (7Li and 6Li), leading to isotopic fractionation. In this study, we analyzed the hydrochemistry and Li isotope compositions of samples collected from a Li-rich salt lake (Bangor Co) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The samples included lake brines, recharge rivers, cold springs, and salt minerals (hydromagnesites). The Li content in the various types of water varied significantly, ranging from 0.06 mg/L to 198.10 mg/L, showing a variation of 4 orders of magnitude. Water samples exhibit a wide range of δ7Li values, varying from 4.89‰ to 16.02‰. Notably, the lowest and highest values are observed in cold springs. Additionally, the concentrations and δ7Li values in hydromagnesite differ across various relative ages. The hydrochemistry indicated that the recharge water is influenced by rock weathering, but the lake brine is influenced by evaporation concentration. The analysis of trace elements and Li isotopic data reveals that rock weathering, geothermal systems, salt minerals, and freshwater, primarily from early geothermal activities and the redissolution of carbonate minerals, contribute to the Li in salt lake brine. Boron isotopes and lithium isotopes of lake brines are found to vary differently. The δ7Li in brine is increased significantly by adsorption of hydromagnesite. And 11B gradually accumulates in hydromagnesite. This study has demonstrated that hydromagnesite plays a crucial role in influencing the characteristics of Li in brine.