Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has several definitions but essentially is a nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer, in which upfront resection is considered not beneficial due to extensive vascular involvement and consequent high chance of a nonradical resection. The introduction of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel (gem-nab) has had major implications for the management and outcome of patients with LAPC. After 4–6 months induction chemotherapy, the majority of patients have stable disease or even tumor-regression. Of these, 12 to 35% are successfully downstaged to resectable disease. Several studies have reported a 30–35 months overall survival after resection; although it currently remains unclear if this is a result of the resection or the good response to chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, selection of patients for resection is difficult, as contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CT) scan is unreliable in differentiating between viable tumor and fibrosis. In case a resection is not considered possible but stable disease is observed, local ablative techniques are being studied, such as irreversible electroporation, radiofrequency ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Pragmatic, multicenter, randomized studies will ultimately have to confirm the exact role of both surgical exploration and ablation in these patients. Since evidence-based guidelines for the management of LAPC are lacking, this review proposes a standardized approach for the treatment of LAPC based on the best available evidence.

Introduction: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a relatively new ablation method for the treatment of unresectable cancers. Although the main mechanism of IRE is electric permeabilization of cell membranes, the question is to what extent thermal effects of IRE contribute to tissue ablation. Aim: This systematic review reviews the mathematical models used to numerically simulate the heat-generating effects of IRE, and uses the obtained data to assess the degree of mild-hyperthermic (temperatures between 40 °C and 50 °C) and thermally ablative (TA) effects (temperatures exceeding 50 °C) caused by IRE within the IRE-treated region (IRE-TR). Methods: A systematic search was performed in medical and technical databases for original studies reporting on numerical simulations of IRE. Data on used equations, study design, tissue models, maximum temperature increase, and surface areas of IRE-TR, mild-hyperthermic, and ablative temperatures were extracted. Results: Several identified models, including Laplace equation for calculation of electric field distribution, Pennes Bioheat Equation for heat transfer, and Arrhenius model for thermal damage, were applied on various electrode and tissue models. Median duration of combined mild-hyperthermic and TA effects is 20% of the treatment time. Based on the included studies, mild-hyperthermic temperatures occurred in 30% and temperatures ≥50 °C in 5% of the IRE-TR. Conclusions: Simulation results in this review show that significant mild-hyperthermic effects occur in a large part of the IRE-TR, and direct thermal ablation in comparatively small regions. Future studies should aim to optimize clinical IRE protocols, maintaining a maximum irreversible permeabilized region with minimal TA effects.

Irreversible electroporation causes cell death through low frequency, high voltage electrical pulses and is increasingly used to treat non-resectable cancers. A recent systematic review revealed that tissue damage through irreversible electroporation is time-dependent, but the impact of time on the ablation zone size remains unknown. Irreversible electroporation ablations were performed hourly during 24 consecutive hours in the peripheral liver of 2 anaesthetized domestic pigs using clinical treatment settings. Immediately after the 24th ablation, the livers were harvested and examined for tissue response in time based on macroscopic and microscopic pathology. The impact of time on these outcomes was assessed with Spearman rank correlation test. Ablation zones were sharply demarcated as early as 1 hour after treatment. During 24 hours, the ablation zones showed a significant increase in diameter (rs = 0.493, P = .014) and total surface (rs = 0.499, P = .013), whereas the impact of time on the homogeneous ablated area was not significant (rs = 0.172, P = .421). Therefore, the increase in size could mainly be attributed to an increase in the transition zone. Microscopically, the ablation zones showed progression in cell death and inflammation. This study assessed the dynamics of irreversible electroporation on the porcine liver during 24 consecutive hours and found that the pathological response (ie, cell death/inflammation), and ablation size continue to develop for at least 24 hours. Consequently, future studies on irreversible electroporation should prolong their observation period.

Identification of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients with the worst prognosis could help to tailor therapy. We evaluated readily available biomarkers for the prediction of 90-day mortality...

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an ablation modality that applies short, high-voltage electric pulses to unresectable cancers. Although considered a non-thermal technique, temperatures do increase during IRE. This temperature rise sensitizes tumor cells for electroporation as well as inducing partial direct thermal ablation. To evaluate the extent to which mild and moderate hyperthermia enhance electroporation effects, and to establish and validate in a pilot study cell viability models (CVM) as function of both electroporation parameters and temperature in a relevant pancreatic cancer cell line. Several IRE-protocols were applied at different well-controlled temperature levels (37 °C ≤ T ≤ 46 °C) to evaluate temperature dependent cell viability at enhanced temperatures in comparison to cell viability at T = 37 °C. A realistic sigmoid CVM function was used based on thermal damage probability with Arrhenius Equation and cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43°C) as arguments, and fitted to the experimental data using "Non-linear-least-squares"-analysis. Mild (40 °C) and moderate (46 °C) hyperthermic temperatures boosted cell ablation with up to 30% and 95%, respectively, mainly around the IRE threshold E_th,50% electric-field strength that results in 50% cell viability. The CVM was successfully fitted to the experimental data. Both mild- and moderate hyperthermia significantly boost the electroporation effect at electric-field strengths neighboring E_th,50%. Inclusion of temperature in the newly developed CVM correctly predicted both temperature-dependent cell viability and thermal ablation for pancreatic cancer cells exposed to a relevant range of electric-field strengths/pulse parameters and mild moderate hyperthermic temperatures.

Objective: To validate the prognostic value of the PAncreatic NeoAdjuvant MAssachusetts (PANAMA) score and to determine its predictive ability for survival benefit derived from adjuvant treatment in patients after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Background: The PANAMA score was developed to guide prognostication in patients after neoadjuvant therapy and resection for PDAC. As this score focuses on the risk for residual disease after resection, it might also be able to select patients who benefit from adjuvant after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: This retrospective international multicenter study is endorsed by the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. Patients with PDAC who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included. Mantel-Cox regression with interaction analysis was performed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Overall, 383 patients after resection of PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were included of whom 187 (49%), 137 (36%), and 59 (15%) had a low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk PANAMA-score, respectively. Discrimination in median overall survival (OS) was observed stratified by risk groups (48.5, 27.6, and 22.3 months, log-rank P _{low-intermediate} = 0.004, log-rank P _{intermediate-high} = 0.027). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with an OS difference in the low-risk group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.50, 95% CI: 0.92–2.50], whereas improved OS was observed in the intermediate (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34–0.97) and high-risk groups (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24–0.94; P interaction = 0.008). Conclusions: The PANAMA 3-tier risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, available through pancreascalculator.com) correspond with differential survival in patients with resected PDAC following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. The risk groups also differentiate between survival benefits associated with adjuvant treatment, with only the intermediate- and high-risk groups associated with improved OS.