Giuseppe Giorgi

Dr. Giuseppe Giorgi

Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2017 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Markel PenalbaMarkel Penalba
Markel Penalba
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
JRJohn V. Ringwood
John V. Ringwood

24 January 2024 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AGAlberto Ghigo
Alberto Ghigo
EFEmilio Faraggiana
Emilio Faraggiana
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
Giuliana MattiazzoGiuliana Mattiazzo
Giuliana Mattiazzo
Giovanni BraccoGiovanni Bracco
Giovanni Bracco

7 July 2022 in Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFEmilio Faraggiana
Emilio Faraggiana
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
MSMassimo Sirigu
Massimo Sirigu
AGAlberto Ghigo
Alberto Ghigo
Giovanni BraccoGiovanni Bracco
Giovanni Bracco
Giuliana MattiazzoGiuliana Mattiazzo
Giuliana Mattiazzo
Compared to onshore wind power, floating offshore wind power is a promising renewable energy source due to higher wind speeds and larger suitable available areas. However, costs are still too high compared to onshore wind power. In general, the economic viability of offshore wind technology decreases with greater water depth and distance from shore. Floating wind platforms are more competitive compared to fixed offshore structures above a certain water depth, but there is still great variety and no clear design convergence. Therefore, optimisation of the floating support structure in the preliminary phase of the design process is still of great importance, often up to personal experience and sensibility. It is fundamental that a suitable optimisation approach is chosen to obtain meaningful results at early development stages. This review provides a comparative overview of the methods, numerical tools and optimisation approaches that can be used with respect to the conceptual design of the support structure for Floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT) attempting to detail the limitations preventing the convergence to an optimal floating support structure. This work is intended to be as a reference for any researcher and developer that would like to optimise the support platform for FOWT.

29 July 2016 in Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
John RingwoodJohn Ringwood
John Ringwood

1 September 2017 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
JRJohn V. Ringwood
John V. Ringwood

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergej Antonello SiriguSergej Antonello Sirigu
Sergej Antonello Sirigu
LFLudovico Foglietta
Ludovico Foglietta
Giuseppe GiorgiGiuseppe Giorgi
Giuseppe Giorgi
MAURO BONFANTIMAURO BONFANTI
MAURO BONFANTI
GCGiulia Cervelli
Giulia Cervelli
Giuliana MattiazzoGiuliana Mattiazzo
Giuliana Mattiazzo
Although sea and ocean waves have been widely acknowledged to have the potential of providing sustainable and renewable energy, the emergence of a self-sufficient and mature industry is still lacking. An essential condition for reaching economic viability is to minimise the cost of electricity, as opposed to simply maximising the converted energy at the early design stages. One of the tools empowering developers to follow such a virtuous design pathway is the techno-economic optimisation. The purpose of this paper is to perform a holistic optimisation of the PeWEC (pendulum wave energy converter), which is a pitching platform converting energy from the oscillation of a pendulum contained in a sealed hull. Optimised parameters comprise shape; dimensions; mass properties and ballast; power take-off control torque and constraints; number and characteristics of the pendulum; and other subcomponents. Cost functions are included and the objective function is the ratio between the delivered power and the capital expenditure. Due to its ability to effectively deal with a large multi-dimensional design space, a genetic algorithm is implemented, with a specific modification to handle unfeasible design candidate and improve convergence. Results show that the device minimising the cost of energy and the one maximising the capture width ratio are substantially different, so the economically-oriented metric should be preferred.