Robbert Cool

Dr. Robbert Cool

Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Biology, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 1998 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJohan de Rooij
Johan de Rooij
FZFried J. T. Zwartkruis
Fried J. T. Zwartkruis
MVMark H. G. Verheijen
Mark H. G. Verheijen
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
SNSebastian M. B. Nijman
Sebastian M. B. Nijman
JBJohannes L. Bos
Johannes L. Bos

1 March 2012 in Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PJPol Nadal Jimenez
Pol Nadal Jimenez
GKGudrun Koch
Gudrun Koch
JTJessica A. Thompson
Jessica A. Thompson
KXKarina B. Xavier
Karina B. Xavier
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
Wim QuaxWim Quax
Wim Quax
SUMMARY: Cell-to-cell communication is a major process that allows bacteria to sense and coordinately react to the fluctuating conditions of the surrounding environment. In several pathogens, this process triggers the production of virulence factors and/or a switch in bacterial lifestyle that is a major determining factor in the outcome and severity of the infection. Understanding how bacteria control these signaling systems is crucial to the development of novel antimicrobial agents capable of reducing virulence while allowing the immune system of the host to clear bacterial infection, an approach likely to reduce the selective pressures for development of resistance. We provide here an up-to-date overview of the molecular basis and physiological implications of cell-to-cell signaling systems in Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the well-studied bacteriumPseudomonas aeruginosa. All of the known cell-to-cell signaling systems in this bacterium are described, from the most-studied systems, i.e.,N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), the 4-quinolones, the global activator of antibiotic and cyanide synthesis (GAC), the cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) and cyclic AMP (cAMP) systems, and the alarmones guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) and guanosine pentaphosphate (pppGpp), to less-well-studied signaling molecules, including diketopiperazines, fatty acids (diffusible signal factor [DSF]-like factors), pyoverdine, and pyocyanin. This overview clearly illustrates that bacterial communication is far more complex than initially thought and delivers a clear distinction between signals that are quorum sensing dependent and those relying on alternative factors for their production.

1 July 2000 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJohan de Rooij
Johan de Rooij
HRHolger Rehmann
Holger Rehmann
MTMiranda van Triest
Miranda van Triest
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
AWAlfred Wittinghofer
Alfred Wittinghofer
JBJohannes L. Bos
Johannes L. Bos
Epac1 (cAMP-GEFI) and Epac2 (cAMP-GEFII) are closely related guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the small GTPase Rap1, which are directly regulated by cAMP. Here we show that both GEFs efficiently activate Rap2 as well. A third member of the family, Repac (GFR), which lacks the cAMP dependent regulatory sequences, is a constitutive activator of both Rap1 and Rap2. In contrast to Epac1, Epac2 contains a second cAMP binding domain at the N terminus, as does the Epac homologue from Caenorhabditis elegans. Affinity measurements show that this distal cAMP binding domain (the A-site) binds cAMP with much lower affinity than the cAMP binding domain proximal to the catalytic domain (the B-site), which is present in both Epac1 and Epac2. Deletion mutant analysis shows that the high affinity cAMP binding domains are sufficient to regulate the GEFs in vitro. Interestingly, isolated fragments containing the B-sites of either Epac1 or Epac2, but not the A-site from Epac2, inhibit the catalytic domains in trans. This inhibition is relieved by the addition of cAMP. In addition to the cAMP binding domains, both Epac1 and Epac2 have a DEP domain. Deletion of this domain does not affect regulation of Epac1 activity but affects membrane localization. From these results, we conclude that all three members of the Epac family regulate both Rap1 and Rap2. Furthermore, we conclude that the catalytic activity of Epac1 is constrained by a direct interaction between GEF and high affinity cAMP binding domains in the absence of cAMP. Epac1 becomes activated by a release of this inhibition when cAMP is bound.

1 March 2006 in Infection and Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSCharles F. Sio
Charles F. Sio
LOLinda G. Otten
Linda G. Otten
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
SDStephen P. Diggle
Stephen P. Diggle
PBPeter G. Braun
Peter G. Braun
Wim QuaxWim Quax
Wim Quax
The virulence of the opportunistic human pathogenPseudomonas aeruginosaPAO1 is controlled by anN-acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL)-dependent quorum-sensing system. During functional analysis of putative acylase genes in theP. aeruginosaPAO1 genome, the PA2385 gene was found to encode an acylase that removes the fatty acid side chain from the homoserine lactone (HSL) nucleus of AHL-dependent quorum-sensing signal molecules. Analysis showed that the posttranslational processing of the acylase and the hydrolysis reaction type are similar to those of the beta-lactam acylases, strongly suggesting that the PA2385 protein is a member of theN-terminal nucleophile hydrolase superfamily. In a bioassay, the purified acylase was shown to degrade AHLs with side chains ranging in length from 11 to 14 carbons at physiologically relevant low concentrations. The substituent at the 3′ position of the side chain did not affect activity, indicating broad-range AHL quorum-quenching activity. Of the two main AHL signal molecules ofP. aeruginosaPAO1,N-butanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL) andN-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C12-HSL), only 3-oxo-C12-HSL is degraded by the enzyme. Addition of the purified protein toP. aeruginosaPAO1 cultures completely inhibited accumulation of 3-oxo-C12-HSL and production of the signal molecule 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4(1H)-quinolone and reduced production of the virulence factors elastase and pyocyanin. Similar results were obtained when the PA2385 gene was overexpressed inP. aeruginosa. These results demonstrate that the protein has in situ quorum-quenching activity. The quorum-quenching AHL acylase may enableP. aeruginosaPAO1 to modulate its own quorum-sensing-dependent pathogenic potential and, moreover, offers possibilities for novel antipseudomonal therapies.

28 April 1998 in Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChristian Lenzen
Christian Lenzen
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
HPHeino Prinz
Heino Prinz
JKJürgen Kuhlmann
Jürgen Kuhlmann
AWAlfred Wittinghofer
Alfred Wittinghofer

6 June 2006 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlmer M. van der Sloot
Almer M. van der Sloot
VTVicente Tur
Vicente Tur
ESEva Szegezdi
Eva Szegezdi
MMMargaret M. Mullally
Margaret M. Mullally
Robbert CoolRobbert Cool
Robbert Cool
Wim QuaxWim Quax
Wim Quax
Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a potential anticancer drug that selectively induces apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells by interacting with death receptors DR4 and DR5. TRAIL can also bind to decoy receptors (DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin receptor) that cannot induce apoptosis. The occurrence of DR5-responsive tumor cells indicates that a DR5 receptor-specific TRAIL variant will permit tumor-selective therapies. By using the automatic design algorithm FOLD-X, we successfully generated DR5-selective TRAIL variants. These variants do not induce apoptosis in DR4-responsive cell lines but show a large increase in biological activity in DR5-responsive cancer cell lines. Even wild-type TRAIL-insensitive ovarian cancer cell lines could be brought into apoptosis. In addition, our results demonstrate that there is no requirement for antibody-mediated cross-linking or membrane-bound TRAIL to induce apoptosis through DR5.