Sebastian Raschka

Dr. Sebastian Raschka

Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 April 2020 in Information
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSebastian Raschka
Sebastian Raschka
JPJoshua Patterson
Joshua Patterson
CNCorey Nolet
Corey Nolet
Smarter applications are making better use of the insights gleaned from data, having an impact on every industry and research discipline. At the core of this revolution lies the tools and the methods that are driving it, from processing the massive piles of data generated each day to learning from and taking useful action. Deep neural networks, along with advancements in classical machine learning and scalable general-purpose graphics processing unit (GPU) computing, have become critical components of artificial intelligence, enabling many of these astounding breakthroughs and lowering the barrier to adoption. Python continues to be the most preferred language for scientific computing, data science, and machine learning, boosting both performance and productivity by enabling the use of low-level libraries and clean high-level APIs. This survey offers insight into the field of machine learning with Python, taking a tour through important topics to identify some of the core hardware and software paradigms that have enabled it. We cover widely-used libraries and concepts, collected together for holistic comparison, with the goal of educating the reader and driving the field of Python machine learning forward.


1 December 2020 in Pattern Recognition Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WCWenzhi Cao
Wenzhi Cao
VMVahid Mirjalili
Vahid Mirjalili
SRSebastian Raschka
Sebastian Raschka

27 June 2023 in Pattern Analysis and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XSXintong Shi
Xintong Shi
WCWenzhi Cao
Wenzhi Cao
SRSebastian Raschka
Sebastian Raschka

21 September 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMVahid Mirjalili
Vahid Mirjalili
SRSebastian Raschka
Sebastian Raschka
ARArun Ross
Arun Ross
Recent research has established the possibility of deducing soft-biometric attributes such as age, gender, and race from an individual’s face image with high accuracy. However, this raises privacy concerns, especially when face images collected for biometric recognition purposes are used for attribute analysis without the person’s consent. To address this problem, we develop a technique for imparting soft biometric privacy to face images via an image perturbation methodology. The image perturbation is undertaken using a GAN-based Semi-Adversarial Network (SAN) — referred to as PrivacyNet — that modifies an input face image such that it can be used by a face matcher for matching purposes but cannot be reliably used by an attribute classifier. Further, PrivacyNet allows a person to choose specific attributes that have to be obfuscated in the input face images (e.g., age and race), while allowing for other types of attributes to be extracted (e.g., gender). Extensive experiments using multiple face matchers, multiple age/gender/race classifiers, and multiple face datasets demonstrate the generalizability of the proposed multi-attribute privacy enhancing method across multiple face and attribute classifiers.

11 November 2020 in arXiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
SRSebastian Raschka
Sebastian Raschka
The correct use of model evaluation, model selection, and algorithm selection techniques is vital in academic machine learning research as well as in many industrial settings. This article reviews different techniques that can be used for each of these three subtasks and discusses the main advantages and disadvantages of each technique with references to theoretical and empirical studies. Further, recommendations are given to encourage best yet feasible practices in research and applications of machine learning. Common methods such as the holdout method for model evaluation and selection are covered, which are not recommended when working with small datasets. Different flavors of the bootstrap technique are introduced for estimating the uncertainty of performance estimates, as an alternative to confidence intervals via normal approximation if bootstrapping is computationally feasible. Common cross-validation techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-validation are reviewed, the bias-variance trade-off for choosing k is discussed, and practical tips for the optimal choice of k are given based on empirical evidence. Different statistical tests for algorithm comparisons are presented, and strategies for dealing with multiple comparisons such as omnibus tests and multiple-comparison corrections are discussed. Finally, alternative methods for algorithm selection, such as the combined F-test 5x2 cross-validation and nested cross-validation, are recommended for comparing machine learning algorithms when datasets are small.