Tony Schmitz

Dr. Tony Schmitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2000 in CIRP Annals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
RDR.R. Donalson
R.R. Donalson

1 January 2001 in Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
MDMatthew A. Davies
Matthew A. Davies
MKMichael D. Kennedy
Michael D. Kennedy
The implementation of high-speed machining for the manufacture of discrete parts requires accurate knowledge of the system dynamics. We describe the application of receptance coupling substructure analysis (RCSA) to the analytic prediction of the tool point dynamic response by combining frequency response measurements of individual components through appropriate connections. Experimental verification of the receptance coupling method for various tool geometries (e.g., diameter and length) and holders (HSK 63A collet and shrink fit) is given. Several experimental results are presented to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed method for chatter stability prediction in milling.

4 February 2005 in Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
GDG. Scott Duncan
G. Scott Duncan
In this paper we present the second generation receptance coupling substructure analysis (RCSA) method, which is used to predict the tool point response for high-speed machining applications. This method divides the spindle-holder-tool assembly into three substructures: the spindle-holder base; the extended holder; and the tool. The tool and extended holder receptances are modeled, while the spindle-holder base subassembly receptances are measured using a “standard” test holder and finite difference calculations. To predict the tool point dynamics, RCSA is used to couple the three substructures. Experimental validation is provided.

1 February 2010 in Wear
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSaad Mukras
Saad Mukras
NKNam H. Kim
Nam H. Kim
NMNathan A. Mauntler
Nathan A. Mauntler
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
WSW. Gregory Sawyer
W. Gregory Sawyer

1 April 2007 in International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
JCJeremiah Couey
Jeremiah Couey
EMEric Marsh
Eric Marsh
NMNathan Mauntler
Nathan Mauntler
DHDuke Hughes
Duke Hughes

13 June 2005 in Journal of Tribology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTony Schmitz
Tony Schmitz
JAJason E. Action
Jason E. Action
JZJohn C. Ziegert
John C. Ziegert
WSW. Gregory Sawyer
W. Gregory Sawyer
The experimental evaluation of friction coefficient is a common laboratory procedure; however, the corresponding measurement uncertainty is not widely discussed. This manuscript examines the experimental uncertainty associated with friction measurements by following the guidelines prescribed in international standards. The uncertainty contributors identified in this analysis include load cell calibration, load cell voltage measurement, and instrument geometry. A series of 20 tests, carried out under nominally identical conditions, was performed using a reciprocating pin-on-disk tribometer. A comparison between the experimental standard deviation and uncertainty analysis results is provided.