Chih-Chien Chin

Chih-Chien Chin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2010 in International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLCheng-Chou Lai
Cheng-Chou Lai
JYJeng-Fu You
Jeng-Fu You
CYChien-Yuh Yeh
Chien-Yuh Yeh
JCJinn-Shiun Chen
Jinn-Shiun Chen
RTReiping Tang
Reiping Tang
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin

26 April 2008 in International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin
CYChien-Yuh Yeh
Chien-Yuh Yeh
RTReiping Tang
Reiping Tang
CCChung-Rong Changchien
Chung-Rong Changchien
WHWen-Shih Huang
Wen-Shih Huang
JWJeng-Yi Wang
Jeng-Yi Wang

14 June 2014 in Journal of Biomedical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YHYung-Yu Hsieh
Yung-Yu Hsieh
CSChien-Heng Shen
Chien-Heng Shen
WHWen-Shih Huang
Wen-Shih Huang
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin
YKYi-Hung Kuo
Yi-Hung Kuo
STShui-Yi Tung
Shui-Yi Tung
Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) (CXC chemokine ligand-12)/CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is involved in the carcinogenesis of human gastric cancer, where it stimulates angiogenesis and favors metastasis of tumor cells to distant organs. In addition, resistin is suggested to be an important link between obesity and the development of gastric cancer. Resistin has identified as an important player in inflammatory responses, and emerged as a mediator in inflammation-associated cancer. A limited number of studies have investigated the association of resistin and SDF-1 with gastric cancer. Herein, we investigated the molecular mechanisms by which resistin influences the expression of SDF-1 in gastric carcinoma cells.

19 July 2015 in Journal of Cellular Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin
JLJhy‐Ming Li
Jhy‐Ming Li
KLKam‐Fai Lee
Kam‐Fai Lee
YHYun‐Ching Huang
Yun‐Ching Huang
KWKuan‐Chieh Wang
Kuan‐Chieh Wang
CSChung-Sheng Shi
Chung-Sheng Shi

1 January 2006 in World Journal of Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WHWen-Shih Huang
Wen-Shih Huang
CWChia-Siu Wang
Chia-Siu Wang
CHChing-Chuan Hsieh
Ching-Chuan Hsieh
PLPaul Y Lin
Paul Y Lin
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin
JWJeng-Yi Wang
Jeng-Yi Wang
Management of patients with stercoral perforation of the sigmoid colon: Report of five cases

1 August 2015 in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMeng-Chiao Hsieh
Meng-Chiao Hsieh
LKLiang-Tseng Kuo
Liang-Tseng Kuo
CCChing-Chi Chi
Ching-Chi Chi
WHWen-Shih Huang
Wen-Shih Huang
CCChih-Chien Chin
Chih-Chien Chin
Stoma reversal is a surgical procedure commonly used following temporary defunctioning stoma surgery. Surgical site infection is one of the most common postoperative morbidities. A few skin closure methods have been developed to decrease surgical site infection. However, the optimal skin closure method is still in debate. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical site infection rate and other postoperative outcomes between the pursestring closure and conventional primary closure techniques. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant trials. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the surgical outcomes following pursestring closure and conventional primary closure techniques. We conducted the meta-analysis by using the random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was surgical site infection following stoma reversal within 30 days after operation. This meta-analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials with a total of 319 participants (162 in the pursestring closure group and 157 in the conventional primary closure group). Compared with the conventional primary closure group, the pursestring closure group had a significant decrease in surgical site infection (risk difference, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.15; p < 0.00001; number needed to treat = 4) and higher satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes (standard mean difference, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.13-1.27; p = 0.02). No other significant differences in operative time, length of hospital stay, and wound healing time were found between the 2 groups. This study was limited to the lack of double blinding and long-term follow-up in the included trials. Pursestring closure has significantly fewer surgical site infections and achieves better cosmetic outcomes following stoma reversal than conventional primary closure.