James Moultrie

Dr. James Moultrie

Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2012 in Proceedings of the IEEE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ANA. Nathan
A. Nathan
IAI arman Ahnood
I arman Ahnood
Matthew ColeMatthew Cole
Matthew Cole
SLSungsik Lee
Sungsik Lee
YSY. Suzuki
Y. Suzuki
WMW. I. Milne
W. I. Milne
Thin-film electronics in its myriad forms has underpinned much of the technological innovation in the fields of displays, sensors, and energy conversion over the past four decades. This technology also forms the basis of flexible electronics. Here we review the current status of flexible electronics and attempt to predict the future promise of these pervading technologies in healthcare, environmental monitoring, displays and human-machine interactivity, energy conversion, management and storage, and communication and wireless networks.

1 November 2004 in Design Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NCNathan Crilly
Nathan Crilly
James MoultrieJames Moultrie
James Moultrie
JCJohn Clarkson
John Clarkson

1 February 2012 in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAnja M. Maier
Anja M. Maier
James MoultrieJames Moultrie
James Moultrie
JCJohn Clarkson
John Clarkson
Managing and improving organizational capabilities is a significant and complex issue for many companies. To support management and enable improvement, performance assessments are commonly used. One way of assessing organizational capabilities is by means of maturity grids. While maturity grids may share a common structure, their content differs and very often they are developed anew. This paper presents both a reference point and guidance for developing maturity grids. This is achieved by reviewing 24 existing maturity grids and by suggesting a roadmap for their development. The review places particular emphasis on embedded assumptions about organizational change in the formulation of the maturity ratings. The suggested roadmap encompasses four phases: planning, development, evaluation, and maintenance. Each phase discusses a number of decision points for development, such as the selection of process areas, maturity levels, and the delivery mechanism. An example demonstrating the roadmap's utility in industrial practice is provided. The roadmap can also be used to evaluate existing approaches. In concluding the paper, implications for management practice and research are presented.

25 June 2003
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
PFP. Fraser
P. Fraser
James MoultrieJames Moultrie
James Moultrie
MGM. Gregory
M. Gregory

19 February 2007 in Creativity and Innovation Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
James MoultrieJames Moultrie
James Moultrie
MNMikael Nilsson
Mikael Nilsson
MDMarcel Dissel
Marcel Dissel
UHUdo‐Ernst Haner
Udo‐Ernst Haner
SJSebastiaan Janssen
Sebastiaan Janssen
RLRemko Van der Lugt
Remko Van der Lugt

25 February 2005 in Creativity and Innovation Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMichael Lewis
Michael Lewis
James MoultrieJames Moultrie
James Moultrie